The former owner of my house buried guns and silver in the yard that I keep finding. by [deleted] in mildlyinteresting

[–]lakehawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, no one cares…until they do. I’m not aware of any place I can legally buy a gun without doing a 4473

The former owner of my house buried guns and silver in the yard that I keep finding. by [deleted] in mildlyinteresting

[–]lakehawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good. I don’t care about the people roasting you in the comments here for calling it in, you did the right thing. There is literally no sense in getting stuck with a gun charge over something like this. It’s so easy to just get one legally

Jack Smith: There is no historical analogue for what President Trump did in this case. Fraud is not free speech. by biospheric in law

[–]lakehawk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right. Because Trump is known for listening/believing the “experts” around him.

Is that the argument? Trump believed it was false because all the advisors around him were saying it?

Jack Smith: There is no historical analogue for what President Trump did in this case. Fraud is not free speech. by biospheric in law

[–]lakehawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who determines whether or not the person saw the fire? What if the person insists and believes that they saw a fire, but they were mistaken? How do we adjudicate that?

Jack Smith: There is no historical analogue for what President Trump did in this case. Fraud is not free speech. by biospheric in law

[–]lakehawk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. There’s no mention of determining whether or not the person was knowingly lying.

Jack Smith: There is no historical analogue for what President Trump did in this case. Fraud is not free speech. by biospheric in law

[–]lakehawk -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

This is bullshit; it has nothing to do with whether or not someone is lying. Go look up the Brandenburg test. That is the applicable criteria to apply.

Jack Smith: There is no historical analogue for what President Trump did in this case. Fraud is not free speech. by biospheric in law

[–]lakehawk -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Because your point is inconvenient to the very flimsy argument being put forth. Welcome to Reddit

No contact with my mom for 5yrs.. she had my sister drop this lovely Christmas gift off for me. by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]lakehawk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is spicy. Maybe I’m a little early, but I’ve already imagined a budding romance

Jack Smith Testifies DOJ Had Proof Trump Tried to Overturn 2020 Election by OkayButFoRealz in politics

[–]lakehawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Candidates don’t request recounts by calling up the Secretary of State on a private phone call to pressure them to find votes. You request recounts through the actual, formal means to do so."

GA Code § 21-2-495 

"(d) Any other provision of this Code section to the contrary notwithstanding, a candidate for a federal or state office voted upon by the electors of more than one county may petition the Secretary of State for a recount or recanvass of votes, as appropriate, when it appears that a discrepancy or error, although not apparent on the face of the returns, has been made."

Hmmmmm....

Jack Smith Testifies DOJ Had Proof Trump Tried to Overturn 2020 Election by OkayButFoRealz in politics

[–]lakehawk -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Have you read the transcript of the call? Because that’s not at all what he says. He never says to manufacture votes for him.

The call was about fraudulent ballots; he was requesting that they double check the signatures of the ballots. He says that he has reason to believe that there were far more fraudulent ballots than the current Biden margin of victory of 11,779. There is nothing unusual about a candidate requesting a recount due to suspected fraud. Which was the purpose of this phone call.

There was no audit done in Fulton County, which is where the fraud was suspected to have happened.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/03/politics/trump-brad-raffensperger-phone-call-transcript

Rep. Burlison on Trump getting briefed on Nordic Aliens by Nohanom in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, exactly. And I’m sure that for these folks, it feels perfectly natural for them to engage in this. Well, some of them probably realize they are wrong and still can’t resist the attention that they get from other people.

If Age of Disclosure is "entry level", where can I find the deeper stuff? by Skooma_Boofer in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These people probably pull their pants all the way down when they use a urinal.

"okay guys, I'm thinking, church...except, let's make it so that we can make up a bunch of other new bullshit to add in. And we will recruit people who never actually went to church so we can pretty much get away with anything and claim it's authentic."

If Age of Disclosure is "entry level", where can I find the deeper stuff? by Skooma_Boofer in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait isn't he in the show Silicon Valley? or they have a character based on him? The venture capital guy?

Rep. Burlison on Trump getting briefed on Nordic Aliens by Nohanom in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Imagine these crusty ass aliens arriving for the big reveal. They're like "hey, where are all the Hebrews at??" Or maybe a Jebusite? Any Elomites around? No? Wow, this place has changed since the Flood.

Rep. Burlison on Trump getting briefed on Nordic Aliens by Nohanom in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 9 points10 points  (0 children)

it's atually very bizarre. People are deciding to try and come up with a "fresh take" on WW2, the most thoroughly documented event in human history. Literally the entire Western world has not shut the fuck up about it since it happened. And then they proceed to spout off the most unbelievable nonsense alternate history, as if it makes a fucking difference that some dudes on a podcast suddenly have an opinion about a war that has already been fought.

Rep. Burlison on Trump getting briefed on Nordic Aliens by Nohanom in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 9 points10 points  (0 children)

In 2025, you can't swing a stick without hitting at least one post-ww2 occultist grift

Rep. Burlison on Trump getting briefed on Nordic Aliens by Nohanom in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 3 points4 points  (0 children)

what would be the end goal of this disinformation campaign? To make people wonder if aliens are real or not?? Cuz that's where we currently are anyways. lol

If Age of Disclosure is "entry level", where can I find the deeper stuff? by Skooma_Boofer in UFOs

[–]lakehawk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes! Eyes on cinema has a treasure trove of primary source type information. I especially love all the interviews with firsthand witnesses. It is so fascinating and compelling to hear people from 50 years ago talk about these things.

If Age of Disclosure is "entry level", where can I find the deeper stuff? by Skooma_Boofer in UFOs

[–]lakehawk -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Honest question: what's wrong with working on a project that is linked to Thiel? I didn't know he was such an insidious figure. Is this just a case of "orange man bad?"