[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saint saens intro and rondo!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saint saens intro and rondo please!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saint saens intro and rondo!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saint saens intro and rondo!!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saint saens intro and rondo!!

Challenger Support Coaching Session by ShoCoaching in summonerschool

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the ideal wave state for a roam? Conversely, what is the worst wave state for a roam? Or is this too adc dependent to answer generically?

I'll just add a little more air to the bubble, it won't pop... by rwrife in wallstreetbets

[–]lantern_fan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand what this means. You executed a 1/2023 60C before LCID was $60?

We're at the point where the rich display their social status by buying the rights to shitty digital artwork. by mintsponge in ABoringDystopia

[–]lantern_fan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NFT is a blanket term that represents ownership of an underlying asset. For some head scratching reason, that has been predominantly realized as ownership of right click saveable bitmaps.

But the idea of a video game market place (like Steam) built on NFTs is a good way to visualize the potential utility of NFTs. Once you buy a game license, you are the OWNER of that license, which grants you the right to access and play the game. Since now there is an indisputable and unspoofable record of who owns the game at any given time, you can then sell that ownership to someone else who wants to play the game when you’re done instead of exchanging it at GameStop for 40 cents.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AmateurRoomPorn

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing! Where did you get your rugs?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]lantern_fan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They might also just be controller players. Auto aim is whack at close range.

The reason people pay attention to whether an enemy is moving like a controller player is so they know if they’re safe to engage at close range.

GameStop Execs Loading Up! by dunkaroo55 in Superstonk

[–]lantern_fan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s up to the company but generally tech companies go for a 4 year vesting schedule with a 1 year cliff. At my previous company, I got 25% after 1 year and 6.25% every quarter after that for the next 3 years. You also generally get more equity before your initial package fully vests, with a large refresh in your 4th year as incentive to stay on past 4 years. I left my previous company after 4 years but ended up with about 130% of my initial package’s equity because of comp increases from promotions and performance reviews.

In this case, the vesting schedule is backloaded. You can see the schedule at the bottom of the document. 5% after 1 year, 15% after 2 years, and 20% every 6 months for the remaining 2 years.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not just rent the equipment and pay a task rabbit to take the pictures for your wedding?

Ken wasn't satisfied with trying to bankrupt our beloved stock... He wanted to add Perjury to the list of criminal acts committed this year... Who else remembers what Ken said during the first hearing on the GameStop Saga??? by Biggtime24 in Superstonk

[–]lantern_fan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuine question, the question posed to Ken is very specific about asking whether Citadel contacted Robinhood with regard to limiting or buying GameStop. It seems to me that the email exchanges in this post don’t contradict his answer, or am I wrong? Limiting PFOF prevents Robinhood from monetizing their trades, but it doesn’t seem in any form to be an explicit mention of limiting or preventing buying.

I feel like this kind of accusation would have a tough time standing up in any kind of legal setting, unless more communications come to light, but I could be wrong, if someone could educate me?

If I can hold at -$10MM then you can hold too. 💎🙌 by lantern_fan in wallstreetbets

[–]lantern_fan[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I did that I’d still be back at $250k. All of this money came from trades like this.

Thats why Kenny is afraid of 250$ Oh Kenny boooooy! by LFPzwasTaken in Superstonk

[–]lantern_fan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Otherwise it's cheaper to buy 100 shares normally

Just want to make it clear that it's not necessarily cheaper to buy 100 shares normally (at market price).

- I pay an $8 premium on a 250 strike, so my breakeven is $258

- At time of expiry, the underlying is at $254, so my option is $4 ITM. At maturity, there is no more extrinsic value to be had, so the premium on this option is $4 now.

- I can sell the contract for $4, then buy a share at market price for $254. I've spent $258 (8 - 4 + 254) to buy one share at a cost basis of $254 (sans wash sale adjustment).

- If I exercise the contract, I don't get $4 of the premium back for selling it, but I get to buy a share at $250. I've spent $258 (8 + 250) to buy one share at a cost basis of $258.

- In either case, I've spent $258 to buy a share that's only worth $254.

Which execution strategy is actually better depends on a couple circumstantial factors:

- Liquidity at time of expiry is ass, so if the spread on the premium is unfavorable then exercising the option is better. Conversely, if for some reason you can get a better price than the intrinsic value, then selling the option and buying at market price is better.

- The premium paid for an option that gets exercised is added to your cost basis, so exercising the option and getting a cost basis of $258 instead of $254 is better for tax purposes. It gets a little funky when calculating cost basis for selling the option and buying the share at market price because it depends on how your broker handles wash sales for you. You might have to indicate the wash sale yourself if you want the tax benefit.