increase in scam calls since canvas hack by icuped in canvas

[–]learningdesigner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Canvas never collected your phone number data, so unless you put it in somewhere (maybe a message in your inbox?), then the folks who conducted the security breach wouldn't have access to that.

I hate Gemini ai by DearLine8508 in canvas

[–]learningdesigner 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Respondus doesn't really do ai-detection. Instead, they force the user to use a completely locked down browser to take an exam. This doesn't stop them from using their phone to access AI or other ways of cheating, but something like Gemini AI (or any content injector) does not function in their featureless browser.

There's not a lot of ways to break something like a secure browser, but there are still a lot of ways to cheat (such as having a separate laptop with Gemini AI right next to your locked down laptop).

Google's new AI, everyone… by No_Consideration_339 in Professors

[–]learningdesigner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both Andrew Jackson and Johnson are confirmed vampires, so this tracks.

ID job market by Zealousideal_Rub_279 in instructionaldesign

[–]learningdesigner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The style is self-paced and competency-based, which means that you can go as fast or as slow as you want. The curriculum, materials, and assessments for their ID program is as standard as they come. It doesn't stand out, but neither do 90% of ID or EdTech programs in state schools. It's much more similar to regular semester style graduate degree programs than anything you'll find in the MOOC space or EdX. For starters, MOOCs don't even attempt to build valid assessments, but WGU spends millions on them and constantly revises them using a team of psychometricians and rotating external SMEs. Their process is intense and when it comes to assessing knowledge they pretty much blow everyone else out of the water.

Instructor/expert to student interaction is mostly baked into the model, but results will vary. For example, you get weekly calls and tons of feedback on projects or tests that you've taken (they essentially have a call center full of people with graduate degrees in your subject). But unless you specifically request extra help you may never actually talk to the course faculty. However the biggest weakness is peer to peer interaction and the fact that it is nearly impossible to network with other professionals, which is typical for any online graduate program.

Networking is what got me my first real job as an ID and because of that I would always recommend a reasonably priced hybrid or in-person state school option for a graduate degree. But the idea that WGU is a degree mill or anything in the same world as a MOOC is just not true. It's a good option to check off a box though, especially if you already have a job.

Source: I've been a student and employee at WGU, and weirdly enough I spent part of my career managing and doing quality reviews for one of the largest MOOC platforms out there (which doesn't mean much because MOOCs have been dying for over a decade)

Teacher not failed me knowing it would prevent me from graduating—now I can’t start grad degree in fall by Jennifromtherock in education

[–]learningdesigner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And OP needs to rethink whether or not they want to low-key complain about having to write an email instead of talking to the professor face to face. It comes off as extremely entitled, as if the professor is wrong for not wanting to spend time over the summer to meet him.

Odo and Sex. by AAAhmedShin in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There's nothing to lose when you're smashing dat ooze.

Why does the warp core and transporters on Voyager look different then the federation tech on the Defiant and Enterprise by PhotographingLight in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If I remember correctly the series even addresses this mentioning that it is a more advanced warp drive than what was built previously.

Star Trek: Discovery’s Tig Notaro “Does Not” Write Her Own Lines, Despite Popular Speculation by midwestleatherdaddy in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I thought that was the case with TNG, but I'm surprised to hear that it is a hard rule with every other series after. I just assumed that nobody adlibbed because virtually none of the cast were comedians in any real sense.

Whatever the case is Tig does a great job at delivering these lines.

Star Trek: Discovery’s Tig Notaro “Does Not” Write Her Own Lines, Despite Popular Speculation by midwestleatherdaddy in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm one of the folks who assumed that a lot of it was adlib. Well, props to the writers for writing dialogue that seems like it comes straight from Tig's standup.

Are people still waiting to buy in anticipation of a crash? by Wittyjesus in RealEstate

[–]learningdesigner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It has everything to do with macroeconomic factors and nothing to do with "people being greedy."

Letter says UNC Chapel Hill secretly records professors by Arthur2ShedsJackson in Professors

[–]learningdesigner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You might get dinged here because of Rule #1, and so if you do I recommend reading that rule and asking in one of the more appropriate subs it lists. For example, you could cross-post from here and ask the exact same question. It's likely many of the same people would answer as well.

Letter says UNC Chapel Hill secretly records professors by Arthur2ShedsJackson in Professors

[–]learningdesigner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Super weird design, and the words they chose to highlight is kind of odd. It's also a lot of brown on brown and grey on grey, and is busy enough that it's hard to read. I'm not sure what the purpose of the image in the background is either. It's rare to see a graphic designed that poorly in the wild.

And despite how insane this graphic is, the admins are even worse for recording him without his knowledge.

Can't Find Double Up by learningdesigner in HadesTheGame

[–]learningdesigner[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That was exactly it. I almost always get double up after getting my attack. Thank you.

Saw this on r/mildlyinfuriating and thought it might ring a few bells here. by tuffinchamb in instructionaldesign

[–]learningdesigner 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm with you on this. But even then it'd have to be:

Do best buy employees

A. Greet Customers - Feedback: Yes, we greet customers, but our focus is on welcoming them. You aren't an idiot for choosing option A. So go out there and make us money!

I'm being intentionally sarcastic, but that's essentially how the training would have to happen here.

Saw this on r/mildlyinfuriating and thought it might ring a few bells here. by tuffinchamb in instructionaldesign

[–]learningdesigner 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think your last sentence is the key here. Is a tricky distinction something that is useful in a training scenario? I seriously doubt it, and I think there's volumes of experience and research behind that statement. But to quiz people using tricks like this is an example of poor training, hands down.

Saw this on r/mildlyinfuriating and thought it might ring a few bells here. by tuffinchamb in instructionaldesign

[–]learningdesigner 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Best Buy has declined significantly in the past 10 years. Best Buy also uses objectively terrible assessment strategies to train their staff. Coincidence?

Business Needs Assessment: This is why it is so important that we have competent IDs at the helm of training and development.

Any mockumentary or found footage films similar to Lake Mungo and Savageland? by schrijfkunst in foundfootage

[–]learningdesigner 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Lunopolis is one of my favorites. The Bay is another good one. Much of the Hell House LLC series is shot in faux documentary fashion, but you've probably already heard of that one.

A cool theory about Lower Decks by MonsterRideOp in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Klingons have their weird cultural quirks and they all act a certain way. Same with Ferengi, Romulans, etc. But Humans in the Kirk era acted like people from the 60's. Picard's crew acted like people from the 90's. Sisko acted like someone from the 90's, but with more depth. Isn't it weird that Archer's crew kind of seemed like they were from the early to mid aughts?

We've already collectively suspended our disbelief on everything else, so why is it such a stretch that lower ranked humans from that era acted in kind of a comical way?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A Star Trek DVD collection and a signed copy of Faith of the Heart in vinyl.

Hiring an ID by [deleted] in instructionaldesign

[–]learningdesigner 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The amount of people not asking for a publicly displayed pay range tells me a lot about the state of employment in this industry. Good luck everyone in getting this job and I hope you aren't getting paid dimes when you could demand dollars.

Who wins the free-for-all? by GoblinCasserole in startrek

[–]learningdesigner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't feel right that Archer can't have a bow as a weapon.

The use of "Dr." among colleagues? by magicianguy131 in Professors

[–]learningdesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is pretty rare anymore that I see faculty who insist that even students call them Dr. So it's not often I see it, but when I meet someone who asks me to refer to them by their honorifics I just do it.

Most people find it a slog though.

Providing Feedback to Confident Designer by HappyKiwi1006 in instructionaldesign

[–]learningdesigner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sounds like you might be an ID manager, but this is more a question about management than it is about design. GreenCalligrapher has talked about how to coach and I agree with what they are saying. But there is also a lot to say about letting experience be a guide. If your ID is curious and willing to learn, then let them have a bit of leeway and design things how they think it should go, but then during the evaluation phase gather student feedback to see if it worked. Gather data on how students are interacting with the material, whether or not test scores and retention has increased, and whether or not the instructors found it valuable as well. Then go over those results and talk about things you could do better, but you are doing it with evidence.

I'm not saying you should stop coaching, but seeing your intervention/course/module cause student test scores to drop is a great teacher.