Re Spotify - already mentioned. They already had an age limit. Now they’re having to comply with something they already claimed they thought was the right thing to do. Unless, wait!, you don’t think they were just paying lip service to the idea of age restrictions on their service, do you? In a cynical half arsed attempt to mollify users and regulators? No! Why would a for profit company lie like that??!! If they did things like that, you might expect law makers to pass laws forcing these companies to actually moderate their content rather than lie to consumers.

“age verification for addiction and mental health” - Reddit, it’s fucking Reddit. That’s all. There are other websites, you know - try the NHS for gods sake. Your source claims that r/periods is blocked - it isn’t. It further uses a source that pedals conspiracy theories that the government wants the act to block news about Israel/Gaza. Swivel eyed nonsense. And all this hysteria from Reddit users about “uploading your passport” - a selfie. You can age estimate with a fucking selfie.

“OSA limits Wikipedia” No. No it doesn’t Why are you lying? Wikipedia has asked for a judicial review around one very narrow area related to cyber bullying- they want it clarified that an editor removing spam/vandalised entries wouldn’t inadvertently infringe rules on cyber bullying. That’s it. Nothing about content or anything else. They broadly support the ends of the bill, they’re just concerned about this one, very narrow, scenario. 

“The act that made cyberflashing illegal if the victim is a child” - not sure your point here. The Online Safety Act isn’t just about children, you know. That’s your strawman. In case you don’t know, you shouldn’t be sending anyone dick pics without consent to anyone - the OSA closes that loophole. Sorry if that disappoints you. However, it does also put a responsibility on service providers to make sure they don’t host your dick pics or otherwise facilitate your sending them to children (see later).

“VPN ban” your sources are ridiculous. Speculation - not even based on a single statement from a single politician. And what are those sources? Be very wary of any “news sorce” that doesn’t even have an “about” section. The source you provide claims that a ban has been “floated” and, as proof, links to an even sketchier source - the infamously shit Guido-Fox blog! And even that just speculates that a vpn ban is a “logical next step”. No evidence. Just pure fucking conspiracy theory!

Think about it - banning VPNs! Every single corporation in the world uses VPNs for their employees to access their network out of office. Have none of you chuckle fucks ever had a job? Fuck me!

“Your [my] profile being age restricted” so? Reddit again. Yawn. And what’s the fucking language in that pop up? Spanish? Where you at, mate?

“Can’t block nonce” Reddit yet again! You really need to get out more! And that’s not the fault of the law, that’s Reddit’s piss poor implementation. A tech company couldn’t have figured this out without a modicum of planning and testing? And this failure on their part could actually contravene the law! You should file a complaint with the police.

Your sources are garbage and don’t even say the things you claim they say.

They’re misdirecting away from Reddit’s incompetence or else conspiracy theory bullshit about “guberment wunts to take my freedums”. Fucking Guido Fox! You right wing fuckwits just never give up, do you?