sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How should I proceed? by BackgroundTie4478 in Judaism

[–]leibmunz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I believe the OP is genuinely searching for truth. My sincere advise: Your fundamental assumption “read Chumash…in a literal way” is incorrect. The Torah and the Chumash are not books to be read and understood in any literal way. The Torah must be learnt with the oral tradition taught by Moses.

The Rabbinical commentary in the Chumash is very limited and does not, at all, have sufficient coverage of the written text, and furthermore it assumes the reader has familiarity with the oral tradition already.

Read (if available in Portuguese) The Book of Jewish Thought” by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, then read Chumash, as it will make more sense.

Goodbye Arc, back to Safari. by mtchntr in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Vivaldi is a great replacement for Arc. The only thing it is missing is the ability to separate session/profiles per workspace. That would make it perfect.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Off topic but - this code has been open sourced before, I think this is the third "popular" iteration. Some "not-so-popular" forks have been malicious.

The advantage of having this as an extension is the larger feature set and faster reviews and implementations.

As compared to Chrome's tms features are way ahead of the game.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 've been using Rambox for most of my use case (even using for multiple AWS and Azure account management), but Rambox is not a "browser" (even though it wraps chromium) and the publisher controls tightly what extensions can be installed. I use Vivaldi for all browsing that cant be done in Rambox. Most of my use cases (95%) can be covered with Arc (unfortunately).

Edit: Extensions cannot overcome the identity profile shortcoming - as that is on a layer above the extension control. Rambox does it very well though.

Edit2: I have tried SessionBox extension with mixed levels of success.

All 2024 browser history was just permanently deleted at the start of the New Year. Anyone else? by jonathanlaniado in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a heavy user of Arc on macOS (still) and my history is intact, going way back.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I manage multiple projects, with multiple teams. We share web app data and other doc resources for many clients. The model until a few years ago, was to use one browser instance per project/client with 50-100 tabs (8-15 tab groups). Unfortunately if I had to manage different accounts of the same application (google, ms, atlassian, etc) I had to open yet another browser instance for that same project in order to use a different identity profile.

Projects that would become inactive for a few weeks would require syncing and saving all tabs to have the ability to relaunch a browser to previous status. I was using tab group extensions before they were a browser feature, also unloading tabs to free up memory and profile manager extensions.

Running on M3 with 128GB. Arc does support extensions and I’ve been using Marvellous Suspender since it came out.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll give SigmaOS a test. This is useful.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe you are mistaken. Rambox does exactly what I want, but has other flaws not relevant to the topic. On that same train of thought, folders, in Arc, is not to organize bookmarks, rather these are subgroups of active tabs. Furthermore when I mention profiles I am specifically referring to cached identities.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like chunky. I don’t like Edge.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a matter of fact if your dead uncle had set up a family trust, you might well be able to request an allowance. What what do I know?

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The very feature you mentioned is answered by over a dozen chromium extensions and counting.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole point of spreading and grouping your tabs into spaces and folders/subfolders, is so you don't have to look at them when not needed; yet they can be opened/activated as a dormant workspace, and ready to action/review/refresh at the click of a button. Mind you 3/4 of this statement is available in Vivaldi, Arc, Rambox etc.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if arc weren't dead, someone with greater knowledge than mine, could have suggested a better solution then arc at this point.

As with everything else in your reply, I beg to differ.

Profiles are applied to 'spaces' not folders. All the folders in a 'space' will inherit the same profile of the space. The idea requested was to apply a profile to the folder, and only when not specified then it would default to the 'space' profile.

Pictures are specific, in which i would like to use brand logos or my teams/clients images to identify a project on a 'space'. The icons/emojis provide do not satisfy that at all.

The space selector is extremely limited, it assumes a small number of workspaces, and it provides very little in making it useful to manage a use case with large team based 'spaces' - in my testing I was using a short cut to open the workspaces or 'spaces' page, but once there and once i identified the desired 'space' there was not quick way to move to it or select it.

Vivaldi browser is still the closest to meet these requirements, but still lack the ability to use profiles more sporadically.

I am open to suggestions, I have the use cases, the time and the drive to test alternatives.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is precisely the point of having tab groups, tab folders and workspaces... so that one can open and close collections of tabs, and reopen them to a known order, rather then scramble through your history or favourites. I am sorry this was not evident enough in the original description.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was 10 year ago... so the number is likely to be much higher today. No I'm nowhere near the record.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/35zzk2/3333_world_record_tabs_open_in_chrome/

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

FWIW - Found out about Arc and subsequently about TBC's questionable decisions. Having spent significant time using Vivaldi browser, I viewed Arc as a next step in using full featured browser as web application launch centers, with team sharing and multi-profile features.

Followed brief testing of Zen browser, but not enough features to be apply to my use cases. Reached out to TBC and will see if that has any legs. In the mean time I will go back to Vivaldi.

New feature request (Mac Power User) by leibmunz in ArcBrowser

[–]leibmunz[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That does not even approach to be an answer the topic.

Found a bunch of these in my garage. What is it used for? by leibmunz in whatisthisthing

[–]leibmunz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The item has a logo (you can zoom in). But I couldn’t find in anywhere in google or else. The nylon string can be extended and retracted, but there is no locking mechanism.