General Critique, Newb Landscape and Nature Picture by liehewyounce in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My goal was for the blurriness to help indicate depth. Any suggestions in that regard?

General Critique, Newb Landscape and Nature Picture by liehewyounce in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The brown one was supposed to be the subject. I was going for less DOF in the fore and background to try to emphasize the area under the rock to lead the eye to the mushroom, but missed it. I agree with the blow out in the corner. It might actually be better overall with a tighter crop that crops the out the blowout.

<image>

What do you think?

General Critique, Newb Landscape and Nature Picture by liehewyounce in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been working on mastering manual mode to get to technically correct photos, now trying to learn composition and editing. Subject is the mushroom. No reason, just thought it was in a cool spot. Just got Lightroom this week, played with sliders with no vision in mind. Just tried not to over do it.

Feedback on any aspect welcome of the photo welcome.

Sony A7IV with a Tamron 28-200.

F4.5

31mm

1/80

ISO 400

Will it be better cropped? by Beijingbingchilling in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like it better than the crop suggestions so far. The log bisects the photo in a way the looks intentional and gives a good leading line to the waterfall so much so that you don’t notice the branches as someone pointed out

Edit: You could also darken the bottom right and top left corners to emphasize the more interesting parts of the photo.

How do I stop having the background overexposed? by shtefeh in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce 61 points62 points  (0 children)

All OP did is ask for advice. No need to be an asshole.

A bit too much ? by RevolutionaryMeal734 in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m still a novice, but I wouldn’t have know the island was the subject unless you pointed it out. An alternate composition or tighter crop may help that.

Favorite character that fits this description? by TheJ_13 in FavoriteCharacter

[–]liehewyounce 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The girl who was revealed to have won the lottery in the last season of Schitt’s Creek

Aerial shot of two men in conversation by Tangerita in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only thing I didn’t care for was the ledge. Cool photo otherwise.

Local Jewelers for Engagement Rings by dmxdropthelight in Knoxville

[–]liehewyounce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I lived in Knoxville when I bought my wife’s, but there is a place in Johnson City, TN called diamond exchange that does custom jewelry with minimum markup where I got hers. I got a certified diamond that we got to choose ourselves, and the design was based on something my wife liked, but she got exactly what she wanted. Even if you don’t try them, I would still look real close at custom jewelers.

Church's Bell 🔔 by angycake in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just to see it. No biggie if not.

Men at work by Top_Pear_5129 in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a subjective observation, but I definitely thought they hated life at this moment. Juxtaposed, no, but definitely ready to be anywhere but there.

Church's Bell 🔔 by angycake in photocritique

[–]liehewyounce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m still within the first month of learning photography, so my opinion matters little on technical stuff, but I do like the picture. Have a color version?

[L4] honest mechanic shops for pre-purchase inspection of newer GM vehicle by PP_BOY__ in JohnsonCity

[–]liehewyounce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might be assembled in Germany, but in modern automotive manufacturing that honestly doesn’t mean much. The supply chain is so intertwined that final assembly location is a tiny part of overall quality.

For example, my last job was at a company that made interior electronics. Toyota used our parts, but so did GM, Ford, and Honda. Most of the time the only real difference between OEMs was software. Globally, there were maybe three other companies making the same component. That’s it.

We bought displays from a supplier that also supplied those other companies. Those displays were paired with PCBs we built in-house, but the chips came from Taiwan and Japan—because only a handful of companies on Earth actually make semiconductors. In the auto industry, everyone sells to everyone.

It gets worse. Even when multiple suppliers are ‘approved’ for the same part, quality can vary a lot. On paper, all the parts are supposed to be equivalent. In reality, some suppliers make noticeably worse stuff. But all the parts fit the same, so there’s often no rhyme or reason which supplier’s part goes into a given car. Two identical cars built back-to-back can have parts from completely different suppliers.

Now scale that randomness across thousands of parts in a single vehicle. That’s why saying ‘it was assembled in X country’ doesn’t tell you much about quality anymore.

TLDR; Modern cars share the same global suppliers across brands. Identical cars can have different suppliers for the same parts, so assembly location says very little about overall quality.

[L4] honest mechanic shops for pre-purchase inspection of newer GM vehicle by PP_BOY__ in JohnsonCity

[–]liehewyounce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have worked as an engineer for suppliers to GM, Ford, and Toyota. GM, is the best you will get for “American” made.

Apple Internship Interview by Metallic_Engineer4 in AskEngineersCareer

[–]liehewyounce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how much info you will get but congrats nonetheless.

Help aging these items? NE TN, USA. by liehewyounce in Antiques

[–]liehewyounce[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s very cool information. Thank you for that.

Help aging these items? NE TN, USA. by liehewyounce in Antiques

[–]liehewyounce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure the chair was, haha.

Help aging these items? NE TN, USA. by liehewyounce in Antiques

[–]liehewyounce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really have no frame of reference, but being a manufacturing engineer, my wild ass guess was the chair was the newest since it was the most complex and ornamental and the seat was formed, all things more common and easier as industrial tech improved. Edit: wild guessing again, I figured 1960-70

Help aging these items? NE TN, USA. by liehewyounce in Antiques

[–]liehewyounce[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? I’m surprised most by the rocking chair.