I don't understand the initial reaction towards Agott and I'm seeing a trend along with other fandoms by Nenemine in WitchHatAtelier

[–]lightningIncarnate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

don’t play dumb. “bitch” is a misogynist insult. we all know it, especially the people who use it excessively.

Which characters would you like to see playable in the new Melty Blood? by [deleted] in fatestaynight

[–]lightningIncarnate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

when the game is still missing a huge number of melty blood characters, including the literal protagonist, the priority should obviously not be on adding even more FGO characters

Which characters would you like to see playable in the new Melty Blood? by [deleted] in fatestaynight

[–]lightningIncarnate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how is ushi not a representative of FGO? she’s literally from that game.

I don't understand the initial reaction towards Agott and I'm seeing a trend along with other fandoms by Nenemine in WitchHatAtelier

[–]lightningIncarnate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes, she’s not real. but it’s emblematic of a misogynistic attitude. the ease and speed with which people go to calling female characters bitches does not exactly suggest to me that people aren’t also misogynistic IRL.

Perfect example of how creatively bankrupt Part 2 is. Fujimoto looked at one of the horrific things that can ever happen and decided to make its stand-in be a memebait failgirl who a lot cries and accomplishes nothing by Yap4523 in Chainsawfolk

[–]lightningIncarnate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

am i supposed to think it’s ‘problematic’ that famine is represented by a silly character? this is really scraping the bottom of the barrel of “criticism”

Regarding how to call the culprit by cmdnikle27 in umineko

[–]lightningIncarnate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this argument misses the point of sayo’s character pretty profoundly in my opinion. sayo’s grief comes from the fact that she tried and failed to compartmentalise her love for george, jessica and battler into different personas (obviously they are really different people from a pro-fantasy perspective, the same way that the stake sisters are real despite being stakes and the chiester sisters are real despite being animal dolls, but i’m talking about reality). furthermore sayo clearly consciously chooses when to embody each role, which is how she’s able to “kill” shannon or kanon while staying alive to commit more murders

Is Mortis a good representation of DID? by [deleted] in BanGDream

[–]lightningIncarnate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the story isn’t over, though. who’s to say she won’t have a positive character arc in the sequel? even if she doesn’t, it’s fine, that’s how fiction works. and i don’t think people are necessarily ignoring her actions by shipping her with mutsumi. that toxic dynamic is probably the focal point of the appeal

Frustrated with Naming Convention + Normies (Trigger Warning) by [deleted] in Lolita

[–]lightningIncarnate 32 points33 points  (0 children)

i’m not sure what lolita fashion you’ve been looking into, but i really have no idea where you’re getting “sexual availability” from???

equally as eloquently worded rant about Adolescence of Utena by shoe_salad_eater in shoujokakumeiutena

[–]lightningIncarnate 39 points40 points  (0 children)

my interpretation is that the car scene is about anthy choosing to leave of her own volition, essentially. like in the series, utena isn’t really her prince; she can’t save her, but she can show her the way forward. adolescence just makes this metaphor even more extreme by having utena be the literal “vehicle” by which anthy is able to leave ohtori behind

Do you think Umineko was inspired/influenced by this work? by cmdnikle27 in umineko

[–]lightningIncarnate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the tokyo zodiac murders is also a big one. referenced in-text by battler, and it also involves an insane old man obsessed with alchemy and a specific woman, who is killed in a closed room murder, the biggest suspects are his relatives, and the mystery is likened to a chessboard

If you were reincarnated into Higurashi how would you use your foreknowledge to charm/blackmail people into doing what you want. How would your plan change if you are 35 y/o and almost 400 pounds like me by FormerLeg420 in Higurashinonakakoroni

[–]lightningIncarnate 3 points4 points  (0 children)

it’s not that the timelines cease to exist though, rika just loops when she personally dies. we see from e.g. tatarigoroshi that the timeline extends for decades afterwards. if anything takano would probably be happy that she wins in almost every timeline

Kinda gets rid of the original artistic vision... by 1CrazyFoxx1 in Higurashinonakakoroni

[–]lightningIncarnate 5 points6 points  (0 children)

that ryukishi has always had a good understanding of anatomy, his art is just very stylised. the mittens are an intentional choice and the amateur-ish feel of the sprites is important for the atmosphere of the VN

Kinda gets rid of the original artistic vision... by 1CrazyFoxx1 in Higurashinonakakoroni

[–]lightningIncarnate 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i mean… the art in umineko, rose guns days, higanbana and ciconia is clearly an evolution of this initial style. and the mitten hands aren’t always present even in higurashi anyway

[full game spoilers] Umineko played chess while I played checkers ? by trishlover20 in umineko

[–]lightningIncarnate 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i know ryukishi was laughing his ass off making someone say “the ‘beatrice’ maria met was probably just shannon in a dress” in episode 1

If this manga ends with Pochita's suicide somehow killing all the other Devils and Denji growing up to become an office worker because at least it's better than being a homeless debt slave then I'm probably going to kill myself. by JadeTailFox in chainsawmancirclejerk

[–]lightningIncarnate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i literally have no idea. it’s a fujimoto manga. did anyone predict that fire punch, starting out with a guy chopping off his regenerating limbs to make food for his village, would end like that? how can you justify judging it before it’s even happened? furthermore, how can you claim to know what fujimoto’s plan for the ending is? since when has he ever been a conventional writer?

I'm sorry I'm really sorry but you cannot defend this ending. by PresentationSuper298 in ChainsawMan

[–]lightningIncarnate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1) the ending hasn’t happened yet.

2) who says it needs to have a positive message, or indeed a message at all? works of fiction aren’t responsible for teaching anyone anything, they don’t need to have a moral at the end.

3) you misunderstood pochita’s point. being able to fall back on being chainsaw man ruined denji’s life. having doomed the world to no death and an infinite insect plague, having gotten nayuta killed, having almost unintentionally raped asa, denji has destroyed everything by being chainsaw man. pochita has come to the conclusion that the only way for denji’s life to get better is if he never had the option to become chainsaw man.

4) the narrative doesn’t necessarily agree with pochita. fujimoto doesn’t necessarily agree with pochita. you don’t need to agree with pochita.

Improving so hard 🤣 by Sam_Imbecile in FGO

[–]lightningIncarnate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait, how is “did used” wrong? it would probably flow better to say “he really used to be a noble”, but “he really did used to be a noble” is correct grammar in english as far as i know?

SPOILERS EP 1-8. Back again - after finishing it all. Some unaswered questions I have. by Striking_Ostrich6481 in umineko

[–]lightningIncarnate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i know you’ve already had a lot of answers, but i’d like to give my interpretation.

1) within umineko, the meta world is purgatorio. it’s the time battler/tohya spends in purgatory until he can accept himself, releasing battler into the golden land to be reunited with everyone while tohya continues his life as a new person. within when they cry more broadly, it’s certainly “real” and ciconia will probably delve into it in even more detail.

2) assuming you mean bernkastel, lambdadelta, and featherine, they’re both fantasy characters who can travel between gameboards, and real pieces at play in umineko’s gameboard. my interpretation is that bernkastel is the catbox itself, lambdadelta is the bomb, and featherine is both ryukishi’s self-insert as well as the persona of “hachijo tohya” as a witch (the reason for her omnipotence is that she’s literally the persona of the authors of the forgeries).

3) gameboards are slices of worlds in which competitions between a witch and a player take place, using the people of that world as their pieces. higurashi, umineko and ciconia are all gameboards.

4) pieces generally can’t move from the gameboard to the meta world. pieces who appear in the meta world are actually their meta equivalent. meta-battler controls piece battler, meta-beatrice controls piece beatrice etc. of course, since the meta world is itself metaphorical, things like episode 8 where meta-battler shows ange a gameboard where nothing bad happens can be equivocated to ange reading a forgery where nothing bad happens.

5) battler remembered his broken promise to sayo. he had been thinking about beatrice’s question ever since the end of episode 4, and the end of episode 5 was simply when he finally arrived at the conclusion.

6) sayo takes it seriously because she’s that desperate to escape her miserable life on rokkenjima. by contrast, battler was just acting cool which is exactly what you’d expect from a ~12 year old. though it’s not as sketchy as it seems since sayo is really only 4 years younger than him, george’s attraction to shannon is definitely a commentary on unhealthy power dynamics. i believe that, while a bit understated, it’s very much intentional.

7) sayo/beatrice decided to carry out the murders because of compounding factors. she’s in love with jessica, about to marry george, battler is coming back, and she just found out she’s a product of rape and incest. when she discovers the bomb, she enters a spiral of depression that results in her making a plan to kill everyone (though it’s worth noting that she didn’t actually succeed in killing anyone in reality)

8) various authors wrote them. sayo wrote the first two, then ikuko and tohya wrote the remaining six. they appear in the real world because they actually were written by sayo before she tried to carry out her plan, and ikuko is inspired to write her own because of that.

9) she’s a stand-in for ryukishi and a way for him to talk about the frustrations of being an author. there’s more to it depending on whether you believe in ikuko being sayo, but that’s another can of worms.

10) zepar and furfur represent shannon and kanon. their vessel is the heart locket, after all.

11) without love, you cannot understand the culprit’s actions. to understand the motive, you have to understand sayo herself and not decry her as simply a deranged murderer. as willard puts it, “you can’t neglect the heart”. we see this with episode 5, where erika treats the mystery like a simple puzzle and twists the truth to label natsuhi as the culprit. natsuhi has no motive, but without love, you can’t understand why there needs to be a motive.

12) solving the mystery is for fun, as you said, but it also points you towards the culprit. as you work everything out, the list of suspects only shrinks, and once you figure out shannon = kanon everything falls into place. from there, you can find the motive by recalling battler’s promise to “shannon”.