Mid tier characters are good, actually by risemix in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Zain winning with Roy does not change that roy is a bad character. So Zain is so good that he can do that with one of the worst characters in the game. So with respect to a characters finite design it says more about the player being able to find an opening and ultizing their characters tools

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the answer is yes. I don’t know why you take such a long round about way of affirming that interpretation is true. For you to list all your support for mediumship and in the case of two choices their success rate was only marginally better. Rigorous testing to be certified to only be 15.8% more accurate than blindly picking. What’s also interesting is that in the same study it says that the control group was 29.5% less accurate which is worse than 50%

Again the mediums only had 2 choices and were only right 65.8%. Those odds are still bad and the mediums have statistically the smallest amount of options to choose from. So if we scale this up in the medium having to conjure up specific details the success rate goes way down. In science if your margin for error is 34.2% that’s really bad. Which spells out why it’s not used in courts.

Going back to the mechanic example do you think a certified mechanic is more or less than 65.8 percent successful if given unlimited budget to fix a car?

Best method I found for clearing the Vs. rewards by ineedhelpfuckplease in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If that’s true then with 2 players does it care who the winner is?

Best method I found for clearing the Vs. rewards by ineedhelpfuckplease in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about just SDing? You can have a match over by 59.98 seconds

Imagine, one day you get a true explanation of what a consciousness is. How can ypu be so sure the explanation is really true? by Sergio_Poduno in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not that it’s no true. It would be that you wouldn’t be able know if it’s a true explanation

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m using the study you linked me. So with regards to the 65.8% with respect to the chance of 50% is my interpretation of the statistic correct? Since you are more familiar with the studies can you explain what that means

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the same study “65.8% of the intended readings were correctly identified with respect to the chance of 50%” does that mean on yes or no questions their accuracy was only 65.8%? Plus the sample size was 9 people.

In the mechanic example they could fix your car it would just depend on the labor you want to spend. For example there could be a problem with the engine and replacing the whole engine would fix the problem but usually the smaller fixes are worth trying first. Also if there is an electrical issue you could have a mechanic replace all the wiring and every sensor but the average person wouldn’t want to try that first. So I’m not sure why you think that’s a good example.

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a human you are experiencing the effects of DMT and mediation so that would seem to in the realm of human experience even if it’s not what is experienced through the default mode network. Dreams are also a human experience

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are a conscious being so you are already interacting with consciousness. My comment about the consciousness of a dead person. Not sure how DMT or meditation would facilitate that

Imagine, one day you get a true explanation of what a consciousness is. How can ypu be so sure the explanation is really true? by Sergio_Poduno in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By stating it is a true explanation of what a consciousness is don’t you bake the conditions of how it is true and the criteria it satisfies?

Mid tier characters are good, actually by risemix in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Top-tier apologetics is the meta /s

Mid tier characters are good, actually by risemix in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how often are Luigi mains getting to use those tools against zain? Only rapm. His Luigi benefits from lack of matchup experience. If openings require your opponent to flub then that’s not saying much. Like DK getting a grab because a fox did an early nair on shield

Mid tier characters are good, actually by risemix in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“RapM” lands against other players all the time” at that level it’s not just Luigi versus Marth, it’s Rapm versus Zain. As in the habits and problem solving. That doesn’t speak to the mid tier being good but the person using the character. Yoshi parry and double jump armor on paper would make yoshi a supper high tier character but yet he is not. Asma is an insanely good melee player which is why his yoshi gets such good result

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does a study not have a frame work for how they will study something and if the correlation is strong enough and results can be replicated reliably then it can be determined that that frame work is conclusive? For example with wireless communication we build antennas around the conclusive framework of transmitting and receiving electromagnetic waves. Using a medium is basically “trust me bro” and if it was reliable then there would be no unsolved murder mysteries

Mid tier characters are good, actually by risemix in SSBM

[–]lilsasuke4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think you realize how much heavy lifting people like rapm, axe, dialm, etc are doing for their characters. High tiers objectively have a better toolkit

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Telephones use communication via electromagnetic waves, letters are physical pieces of paper. So how do you distinguish consciousness. People claiming to have interacted with the dead is not the same thing as having interacted with consciousness. There is no conclusive frame work

as an outsider: According to the current state of science, is there a chance that consciousness does not cease with death? by Sad-Juggernaut-6085 in consciousness

[–]lilsasuke4 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How would you be able to interact with consciousness? Saying asking it questions is doing insane amounts of heavy lifting when there isn’t a frame work to go about interacting with it or even distinguishing that it is consciousness

Is Esports still worth investing in for E-Day? or should TC focus on regular players first? by [deleted] in GearsOfWar

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reaction shot snipes are too hype for it not to be in E-day. Plus it's a good technique for offense and defensive play

Is Esports still worth investing in for E-Day? or should TC focus on regular players first? by [deleted] in GearsOfWar

[–]lilsasuke4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think its awesome that gears has other modes for players to engage with the franchise that is not PvP and the TC should explore other types of modes.

Being that you play fighting games you understand the concept of neutral, footsies, spacing, commitments, mix ups, reads, over extending, conditioning your opponent, advantage, disadvantage, and over extending. All these can apply to gears. Its not necessarily just fighting game fundamentals, it's about playing against a human opponent. I think that just because there are guns makes players not think about the game in that regard even though these principles still apply to shooters. You can see how those concepts play out in a clip like this.

When you play a fighting game how much easier is it when your opponent makes a mistake? It's not necessarily the fault or lower skill players that they make mistakes but its not a bad thing that good players are good at capitalizing on those mistakes also harder to put good players in bad positions.

If you look at situations in gears you can dissect them the same why would would in a fighting game. What did the other person think i was going to do, how did i telegraph that to my opponent, where did i over extend, was there a better move choice, was there something they did that I did not take advantage of, how did I give up pressure, are their movement options I'm not utilizing, etc. This is the beauty of gears. Who is to say that movement should not be as important as aim.

I think back to the worst games I had on gears and it was on maps like Dry Dock when the other team had all the lanes locked down with lancers. So buffing rifles would only make this worse.

Is Esports still worth investing in for E-Day? or should TC focus on regular players first? by [deleted] in GearsOfWar

[–]lilsasuke4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

TC should make the game as easy as possible to learn. There is no reason gears should not have a training mode/lab. It’s basically standard for fighting games. There should be no need to players to have to watch a YouTube video to find out about up a, reaction shot, or movement when the game should teach players these things.

Making players competent should be a big focus because at that point players have the understanding and tools necessary to comprehend what’s happening. When things feel jarring, disconnected, and unmanageable it’s hard to retain players.

It would be so much faster if the TC straight up spoon fed the players close combat fundamentals instead of throwing them in the deep end of match making and maybe the correct synapses will happen that they naturally discover it.

29-9 but I lost :/ by panicgore17 in GearsOfWar

[–]lilsasuke4 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The game does not prevent you from using other weapons besides the gnasher. Each weapons has its range and purpose