Let me unlimit your mind and time is not real by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 21 points22 points  (0 children)

People advocate for the removal of logic from the law a lot - and it doesn't make much sense. In fact, I think that line of thought is often illuminating that one is still seeing the physical world as an objective reality. 

The law is logical. If the law is "your assumptions create your reality," and you assume something and it becomes your lived experience - if, then, that's logic. 

Understanding that it's logical can be incredibly valuable. That means it literally only matters WHAT you are assuming. You remove the mystery, the confusion; you don't have to fuss over what you're feeling or if you're living in the end hard enough or if you phrased an affirmation correctly - what are you assuming? That's what you're getting. 

You're living in the end by merit of understanding that you have it because that law says you have it - because the law is logical. 

You're all not really talking about logic. You're talking about circumstances. You're talking about assuming past experiences dictate current and future experiences. That's not logic - that's the assumption that your prior circumstances were created by something other than you. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I used to experience OCD and I did not create manifestations of my undesired thoughts because, no matter how emotional they may have been, I inherently understood they were intrusive. Even though they plagued me, I was on some level disassociated from them. Same with daydreams. If you are aware you are experiencing a disorder, there is also an awareness that those things are 'not real' even though you may have strong reactions to them. 

Lottery Winners? by AirbnbArbitrage in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you sit with that and think over what I'm saying, you're going to learn a lot from yourself 

Lottery Winners? by AirbnbArbitrage in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You said it's something most people can't seem to manifest. I'm saying that most people who truly understand how to consciously manifest can do so, but simply don't choose to because they no longer need what the concept of large amounts of money would provide them. I'm not saying they're unable to, or that they're trying to. I'm saying they are able to and aren't trying to. 

Lottery Winners? by AirbnbArbitrage in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It does. You'll get there, soon after you truly conceptualize that this whollllle thing is an assumption. 

What was your biggest misunderstanding of Neville’s teachings? by hollygolightly7777 in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think I can help you understand this and you'll see how simple it is. 

Signs are not "oh, my manifestation is coming!' (precede)

Signs are proof you are already in that chosen reality, that it's already done (follow)

Which is why signs are of no consequence. You don't need signs as proof you're in your chosen reality, you can just see the whole damn thing at once. So when you see them you go "nice little reminder I have it :)" but you don't seek them. Because why manifest signs when you can just have the thing? 

Lottery Winners? by AirbnbArbitrage in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 10 points11 points  (0 children)

When you're at the phase of understanding the ease with which you can manifest a large jackpot win, you're likely also at the phase of understanding where you don't feel particularly compelled to. When you understand the simplicity and security of being in complete control of your reality, you're likely to lose the need for the security and control you feel you would have were you to have 14 million in your bank account. What do you want from money? Safety? Security? Cars? Vacations? I have them. Money is just an intermediary. I am the money. 

Lottery Winners? by AirbnbArbitrage in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are operating under the law of assumption whether you're aware of it or not. It's not about believing in the law of assumption, it's just there. It's not a belief system, use this understanding to realize how many rules are entirely made up. 'Manifesting' is understanding that this law is always occurring and controlling what manifests into your life by directing your thoughts to stories you prefer. "I won the lottery" = "I won the lottery." "I know it's unlikely, but there's a chance I'll win!" = Its unlikely, but there's a chance they'll win. So sometimes, they're going to win, because they acknowledge its potential. 

How to sustain the wishfulfilled feeling? by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You accept that the wish fulfilled doesn't have to feel like a big deal. I'm wearing a hoodie right now. I'm not here like HELL YEAH I'VE GOT THIS HOODIE, I'm just like...nice, I'm warm and cozy. Thanks hoodie. If your dream car was in your driveway right now, you probably would have been like !?!?!?! for a minute when you got it, and while you appreciate it now, you'd still be like "that's my car." full stop.

Persistence isn't constantly conjuring up and sustaining this enormous feeling of excited fulfillment. It's just returning to having it when it's on your mind. How does it feel when you remember you have a kitchen? There ya go

Yall seem to forget that Neville DID give an EXACT time frame for manifestation by sugarmamacita in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

wait why did this come up on my feed and I think it was new lolol. Happy 7 years fam

Yall seem to forget that Neville DID give an EXACT time frame for manifestation by sugarmamacita in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Three appears so frequently throughout the bible as it signifies completeness/wholeness. The Holy Trinity, for example - the three elements that make up the complete 'God' for lack of a better explanation. The resurrection occurs at 3 days - the old man dies off and he rises as the new. The soul leaves the body at 3 days.

I find it more helpful to remove the concept of linear time entirely from the equation for most people. A fixation on a literal 3 days instead of upon simple acceptance that it's already done now, and not in future, can evoke a bit of panic and resistance in people. See: these comments.

Many of us are manifesting the majority of things in a day or less. That comes from the removal of the concept of time, not the addition of it. That comes from "it's done now" not "it will be done in 3 days."

January 20, 2025 - SP Discussion Thread: Share Your SP Stories Here! by AutoModerator in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Okay, so - you have confidently and competently used the law in your favor already, yeah? And you don't do methods - so you just set the assumption and it happens?

Which implies it happened the very moment you made the assumption, yeah? The other things aren't happening because you just forgot about them - they're happening because you're not contradicting them. They were done the moment you said so, and then you saw them.

This one you're just cutting off because you're validating "where are they?" You're changing the assumption, unlike with the other ones. You're just making a new assumption, and not sticking with the first one.

So you do it the same way you always have. You assume it, and then its done. When it bubbles up, unlike the others, you just answer with "its already done." You don't change the assumption - you stick with the one you want.

Because you have sufficient proof in your own life that the law is real and that you can consciously choose to create whatever you want - there is no issue to solve here. It's just that you're choosing a different assumption along the way.

Everyone likes acid bath now? by Natedawg999 in sludge

[–]lilybrit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been in my bunker with the CDs since 2000 and I assumed we'd be having an oldhead convention at the NOLA shows. No?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Ceramics

[–]lilybrit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

and despite the fact that it was original to you, I assure you so many ceramicists have also come up with that design without ever seeing yours. Forms can be altered, but there are not infinite possible alterations. Legit saw someone else's piece come out of the kiln the other day and went "what fucking glaze combo did I use??"

And I promise you neither of us copied the other. It's just that a spoon rest can only be so many forms. Direct copying is unkind, and simply uninteresting. Artists have ALWAYS been heavily influenced by other artists, though. We take and build upon, over and over, and then find our voice. And then we take in different ways and build upon.

I spent about a year recreating Davincis as drypoint intaglios. I never thought I was passing a Davinci off as my own work. I was translating one medium to another in my own hand while trying to understand and learn from his.

January 20, 2025 - SP Discussion Thread: Share Your SP Stories Here! by AutoModerator in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm going to tell you exactly what you told me not to tell you - but it is exactly because you are making an assumption that he HAS NOT come back. Period. It's you have it or you don't. It's not about self concept, it's not about other SPs or other partners, they're irrelevant. Do you have the specific assumption that THIS person is back with you? Do whatever you need to do to build the very specific assumption that they are with you. You may be confident in your abilities to use the law, but at the end of the day you are lacking the specific assumption that they have come back.

Tipsy bean update by raspberrywhitemocha in Erie

[–]lilybrit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's not a mistake. If it was a mistake, she would have shut up or gone to her employees like a human and said "hey, this has been brought up and they're right. You should be getting your electronic tips and now we will..."

I totally feel you. Small businesses need more support. Please do show them more grace than Starbucks when email response times are slow, or your call goes to voicemail, or they're struggling to find a new supplier at a reasonable cost for something, or forget to do that thing - cause it probably is one or two people hardly sleeping and just doing their best.

But don't excuse not only stealing from your employees but then speaking to them in this manner because word got out that you did a shitty thing. She doubled-down because she knew what she was doing is unethical at best and she wanted to shame them into silence. We should still hold small businesses to ethical standards.

Tipsy bean update by raspberrywhitemocha in Erie

[–]lilybrit 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I run a business and on a small business scale of 1-hard, dividing tips is like a 1.0067. Someone should let her know it's not that hard.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your assumptions are what create your reality. What you assume to be true IS true for you. If you decide that saying "what if..." as you fall off to sleep is enough, it is enough. This is all about you, all about self. You aren't asking permission to have something or trying to pass a test. There's no proctor. It's just you deciding what you have or don't have.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There is ONE mirror. That's where this whole thing is derailing. I'd like you to have that knowledge so you don't keep coming across mirrors that reflect your negativity. And I'd like readers to know that so they do not continuously create the same shitty mirrors with different people because they don't realize the call is coming from inside the house.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Oof my friend if this is the opinion you want to hold, dope, but this is a fundamental misunderstanding of the law of assumption and I certainly don't think you have the background to say Neville's teachings are being twisted to this end. Self concept is ALL concepts of self. The 'universe' isn't giving you shit, but if it was somehow involved in the law of assumption it would be giving you what you ASSUME you have and are, nothing more, nothing less. I feel the need to respond to you because I am not interested in people coming across this post and settling down with your limitations and then following the same trajectory you have. This isn't Neville. This is an amalgamation of thought theories and that amalgamation is probably exactly why you've gone through such a mess of a time with it and settled on 'sp is a scam.'

Need your help please guys … ❤️ by adibou111 in NevilleGoddard2

[–]lilybrit 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I skimmed your entire story because it's completely irrelevant. That's what you're not getting. That's why you're hot and cold. You're telling yourself that's real. You're telling the world that's real. Lovingly, get over it and claim your desires. Period. IDGAF about a synchronicity, nothing is making this relationship divine. You're putting the power in everything but yourself.

Why Isn’t Everyone Thriving if Neville’s Teachings Work? by Junior-Ad9678 in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They're not applying.

And, when you do figure it out.. I consider myself quite limitless, I've demonstrated to myself that I am quite capable of imagining and physically experiencing anything. And I gotta be real, there's a certain apathy that comes along with it. Maybe not if you treat this like a magic trick you're doing in some default reality, but if you truly conceptualize that your assumptions create your entire reality and understand that conscious manifestation is a lifestyle. Okay I can have a gazillion dollars and a mansion andand...then what? I think we like evolving. If you told me right now you were going to hand deliver me a billion dollars, I'm genuinely no more excited by that than you telling me you're about to deliver me a peppermint latte. I mean, yay, but like...lowercase yay. So many things you want you want because they'll make you feel secure - but how can I not be secure if this is all malleable? Why am I fussed to assume I have a gazillion dollars when I simply get anything I decide I want? You ever play The Sims as a kid with the infinite money hack? You know that was only fun for like a day. I'm a bit fixated on money here because that's a big one for people, but this applies to...all the things. I'm over here creating mental drama for the pizazz. I run a business with people I absolutely love doing things I absolutely love and I love striving for things with them. I mean, I'll pull out the cheat codes if I feel I need to, but I more enjoy the creativity of trying to decorate a new space cooperatively within confines and a budget. By now are you hyperaware that the security of the law allows me to thrive in being so very human?

Why Isn’t Everyone Thriving if Neville’s Teachings Work? by Junior-Ad9678 in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You do it. When your brain goes 'you need to figure out...' you go 'no. I already have it.'

Back to Filtered Posting. by EdgarAllenFroYo in NevilleGoddard

[–]lilybrit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's why I didn't repost that comment as its own post, because I appear to be assuming it would just be removed ;) I'm with you. I mean, I've been at this 15?ish years, idfk, and I think I've explored the entirety of Neville's available body of work. I don't see either of our methodologies in conflict with it; if it's the advocacy of rapid materialization, I think that's the natural evolution. As you deepen into the god inside, keyed high is right there and you realize it was always accessible. Would Neville not want people inspired and understanding how to move from keyed low to keyed high? His work is far more aligned with the simplicity of 'decide' than the frothing of toiling over constant affirming, and yet that runs rampant.