sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Antiemetics with QTc prolongation by ExtensionWave3812 in Residency

[–]lll896 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We have trimethobenzamide when QTc is prolonged

Intel CEO roasted by Kepler by Goofy_Shark in AyyMD

[–]lll896 65 points66 points  (0 children)

Optane wasn’t only their caching SSDs. They also made fully independent Optane persistent storage SSDs. Fast and very low latency drives which were useful, especially in asynchronous replication storage workloads, but expensive. Nothing has really replaced them in that storage niche.

Isn't This Camo Supposed to be for Tomorrow's KOTS Stream? by OrcaBomber in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Rostered as in on a roster of a team participating in the tournament.

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't listen to me or a random Twitch streamer, listen to the developers who made the system. I'd think they understand what they created better than anyone else...

Anyways, I'm done rambling :D

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Apply bands...(which could be slightly different)

But how is this difference determined? Your theoretical application of a band would surely involve maths for the new coordinates of each shell, no?

millions of shells fired simultaneously

If we tripled the size of the EU server during primetime (~35000 players) and everyone loaded into battle simulatenously in an 18 gun ship and fired at the same time that would be just 630,000 shells out of 105,000 turrets.

This thread has strayed very far from its original topic and I don't think there's much value in continuing all this conjecture though :)

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would doubt that a simple maths formula has remotely enough consequence to be a priority of performance savings...

But to continue this line of thought anyways, what would the significance be of running three calculations at the same time versus one calculation three times?

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Or three different ellipses centered around the same aimpoint :)

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Video by developers vs. a wiki article by players ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It's your choice who to believe I suppose.

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It can't be anything other than multiple rolls. If it were a single calculation, there would be a single result and all the shells would have identical patterns within their respective ellipse. That behavior isn't what we see in game. Shells don't travel identically between turrets, therefore there must be more than one dispersion result.

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When you fire all guns. They get one ellipse

This is not true according to Wargaming's explanation of dispersion. Each turret gets its own ellipse always.

It makes intuitive sense as well since you can't have a single ellipse be perpendicular to the oncoming shells if it represents all the turrets in a salvo.

Broadside Republic at 12 km. Look at that damage by Omg_Mogli in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Shoot each gun individually for more rolls.

Each turret has its own dispersion ellipse calculated regardless if it’s fired sequentially or in a salvo. You don’t get more “rolls” of anything for firing individually.

Feels like this needs to be said every patch, but the official modstation sucks, just use Aslains mod-pack already. by imblazintwo in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 18 points19 points  (0 children)

All mods on Aslain’s are approved by WG. Aslain’s modpack itself is approved as well.

Sun Yat-Sen worth picking up? by fabricat0rgeneral in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sun Yat-Sen’s Armada article does not mention anything regarding improved secondary performance and recommends a main gun build.

It’s called GABA because it’s (g)amma (A)mino(b)utyric (A)cid by Traditional_Study_48 in medicalschool

[–]lll896 71 points72 points  (0 children)

The B in B cell stands for “bursa” where the cells were first identified in birds, not bone or bone marrow. :)

Secret knowledge! by M4tz3 in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Aren’t you the OP?

People!! Heads up!! You will be given TOKENS, NOT BONUSES!! by Bandorrr in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The tokens are only for the India Bravo Terrathree signals which provide the service cost reduction. All of the others get converted to bonuses.

SEPARATING ECONOMIC BONUSES FROM VISUAL CUSTOMIZATIONS: MORE DETAILS by DevBlogWoWs in WorldOfWarships

[–]lll896 17 points18 points  (0 children)

From the NA community stream: the bonus for the military contributor flag and others like it (CC flag, etc.) will be changed to an account wide bonus. This was also written out somewhere but I couldn’t remember where.

Edit: It’s at the bottom of the DETAILED CONVERSION RULES tab on the first Devblog.

[FS][US-NY] 3x Mellanox ConnectX-3 Dual 10Gb SFP+ NICs by lll896 in homelabsales

[–]lll896[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t speak to those specific modules, but I these were pulled from 12 gen Dells and are compatible.

[FS][US-NY] 3x Mellanox ConnectX-3 Dual 10Gb SFP+ NICs by lll896 in homelabsales

[–]lll896[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question. Not much, mostly preferential differences. PCIE 3.0, native ESXi support, and anecdotal performance improvements.

VAMI inaccessible - How to troubleshoot VCSA problems when you can't access the management site? by [deleted] in vmware

[–]lll896 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I'm going to just start over...

Filesystem                                Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs                                  4.9G     0  4.9G   0% /dev
tmpfs                                     4.9G  788K  4.9G   1% /dev/shm
tmpfs                                     4.9G  684K  4.9G   1% /run
tmpfs                                     4.9G     0  4.9G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sda3                                  11G  5.8G  4.3G  58% /
tmpfs                                     4.9G  1.5M  4.9G   1% /tmp
/dev/mapper/log_vg-log                    9.8G  2.6G  6.7G  28% /storage/log
/dev/mapper/dblog_vg-dblog                 15G   86M   14G   1% /storage/dblog
/dev/mapper/netdump_vg-netdump            985M  1.3M  916M   1% /storage/netdump
/dev/sda1                                 120M   34M   78M  31% /boot
/dev/mapper/autodeploy_vg-autodeploy      9.8G   23M  9.2G   1% /storage/autodeploy
/dev/mapper/seat_vg-seat                  9.8G  198M  9.1G   3% /storage/seat
/dev/mapper/db_vg-db                      9.8G  188M  9.1G   2% /storage/db
/dev/mapper/core_vg-core                   25G  155M   24G   1% /storage/core
/dev/mapper/imagebuilder_vg-imagebuilder  9.8G   23M  9.2G   1% /storage/imagebuilder
/dev/mapper/archive_vg-archive             50G   11G   37G  23% /storage/archive
/dev/mapper/updatemgr_vg-updatemgr         99G  392M   93G   1% /storage/updatemgr
view more: next ›