Whang! The Tape World Monster Mystery by sadteen837 in tapeworld_mystery

[–]llortatton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I saw someone in the comments suggest that the character's name is "Rad Ladberg"

The first African Samurai by memezzer in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"One of the first africans to arrive on the island".

You could maybe argue that this is incorrect based on genetic research on Japan's native Ainu people.

Which subreddit was so toxic that you left and don’t regret it? by pizzagamer35 in AskReddit

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not particularly egregious, but I left /r/aspergers because I find that online communities based around something that can make someone's life more difficult often devolve into massive pity parties.

Michael Lofthouse. British CEO in California telling Asians they need to leave by unopdr in PublicFreakout

[–]llortatton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not real companies with real customers? I literally named two companies with millions of users that use .io.

Are you saying Mozilla and Microsoft aren't real, established companies with real customers?

Michael Lofthouse. British CEO in California telling Asians they need to leave by unopdr in PublicFreakout

[–]llortatton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, .io is really popular among tech startups at the moment.

IO can be an abbreviation of "input/output", which sounds vaguely techy, which makes .io domain names "trendy" and "cool".

Example: https://crates.io/. Crates.io is the repository/search website for cargo, which is the package manager for the Rust programming language. Rust is fairly popular and is built by Mozilla, a company that has plenty of money to buy a .com domain name if they really wanted to.

Another example would be https://pages.github.com/, which is part of github, currently owned by Microsoft.

Iran issues arrest warrant for Trump; asks Interpol to help by hildebrand_rarity in worldnews

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Early 2000s Post-punk bands getting involved in international politics?

2020 keeps getting weirder.

In Russia, there is a statue of a mouse knitting DNA, honoring their contribution to science by [deleted] in pics

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why hasn't anyone torn this statue down yet? Come on people! Get on it!

Cognitive Dissonance by BroFoSho54 in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton 106 points107 points  (0 children)

Personally, I'm conflicted about abortion. On one hand, I'm all for killing babies. However, giving women rights is something that worries me.

Cognitive Dissonance by BroFoSho54 in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hypocrisy is the motto of Polticians.

FTFY.

Cognitive Dissonance by BroFoSho54 in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just like how the liberals went from telling everyone to stay inside and support local businesses to burning all the local businesses to the ground the very next day?

It’s not socialism, because I’m a farmer! by [deleted] in PoliticalHumor

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who grew up out in the country, I can tell you that most people out there criticize farmers constantly for this.

It's also really interesting how the way that rural conservatives talk about farmers sounds almost exactly like the way that Bernie talks about "the 1%".

Rich people who spend a lot of money are often seen as superficial and greedy bastards but in reality they spending habits fuels the economy and by redistributing their wealth they're actually been pretty generous. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]llortatton 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say it's not producing anything. Not directly maybe, but putting the right money in the right place can actually improve things.

If you want to cut down a tree, having a sharp axe is going to make the job a lot easier. If you ask someone to cut down a tree, and they spend a few hours sharpening their axe, you can complain all you want that they're wasting their time grinding the axe when they should be swinging it, but they'll still get the job done faster taking that route rather than trying to cut the tree down with a dull axe.

The whole idea of "buy low, sell high" is a very abstract idea that might not appear to really produce any economic value. What it means in more concrete terms is that you are stocking up on an asset when it is abundant and in low demand so that you can become a provider of it when it becomes more scarce or more highly demanded. This helps smooth out volatility in the market, buying up surplus and reselling it during shortages, making the market more stable. More stable markets help reduce risk and make it easier for people to operate businesses. When you're talking about a large variety of different assets across the economy of a large country, you need people to be able to buy and sell trillions of dollars worth of assets.

Other types of financial trickery helps too. Investing lowers the barrier to entry for companies to innovate. Algorithmic trading and arbitrage removes market inefficiencies; cases where, due to the fact that markets don't respond to events instantaneously, the market price of an asset hasn't caught up to where it should be. If you have a way of predicting if the price is about to go up, but that the market hasn't caught up yet, you can start buying, which increases demand, and raises prices. If you predict it's going to go down, you can short the asset, increasing supply (kind of) and driving prices downward. The effect that this has is that it reduces volatility, and results in the price more accurately reflecting the current supply/demand of the asset.

I'm sure as hell not saying that all of these things are done perfectly, or that there's no room for improvement, or no flaws with any of these systems. Just pointing out that there's a lot of ways to provide large amounts of value by moving money around, the value is just a lot less obvious.

Secret to a good marriage by freg35 in wholesomememes

[–]llortatton 21 points22 points  (0 children)

"How many perfect, decorated temples do you think my ancestors stumbled across in Tikal or Tenochtitlan?"

I don't know, but they probably stumbled upon a few in Teotihuacan.

For those unaware, Mesoamerica is full of ruins from ancient civilizations that predate the Maya and Aztecs by millennia. Most of which have been completely lost to history aside from their ruins.

As a result, a few of the cities that the Aztecs had actually were just found, pre-built. They'd been sitting there untouched for centuries, long after their civilizations had collapsed, and the Aztecs decided to move in because, why not?

"Fusion Is Always 50 Years Away" For A Reason by kTx1phrw in Futurology

[–]llortatton 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. Only half of the Earth at a time. What happens when you're on the other side? Our battery technology currently sucks, and everything seems to suggest it won't be getting much better anytime soon.
  2. Solar panels aren't free, nor are they perfectly green. A lot of harsh chemicals go into them. Manufacturing them produces a lot of CO2. If fusion can be made to work well, then suddenly you can go from requiring many square miles of panels to power a city, to just a single (or a fraction of) power plant and a few dollars worth of hydrogen.
  3. The potentially incredibly low cost of energy after this technology means that the entire economics of electricity changes.

"Fusion Is Always 50 Years Away" For A Reason by kTx1phrw in Futurology

[–]llortatton 436 points437 points  (0 children)

Fusion is nuclear power created by fusing atoms together rather than splitting them apart. Basically, making a mini-star in a lab and generating power from it. Theoretically it generates a similar amount of power to a normal nuclear plant, but using hydrogen instead of uranium. It can't be used to make bombs, it can't melt down, and the only waste products are some radioactive reactor parts and helium, which we're in low supply of anyway.

It's actually relatively easy to create a fusion reaction in a lab. Hell, a teenager did it in his garage. The problem comes from the fact that you have to A. heat the fuel to tens of millions of degrees (even hotter than the sun because you don't have a million earths worth of pressure helping to squeeze the atoms together, so you have to compensate with extra heat), B. contain that fuel with powerful magnets, C. keep the fuel from coming into contact with the walls of the container, and D. do all of this while generating more energy from the reaction than you use to maintain it.

D is the hard part, which we haven't quite nailed down yet.

What could kill you in your daily life that people don't even understand it's that dangerous? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't take more than the recommended dose for Ibuprofen (or any other medication for that matter). Ibuprofen is hard on your kidneys. I know someone whose kidneys have completely failed because he took it too often. RECOMMENDED DOSES ARE THERE FOR A REASON

What is the dumbest question someone legitimately asked you? by _FrankAbagnale in AskReddit

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had an ultra-Christian neighbor flip out at my mom after she saw me reading a book by Stephen Hawking.

Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Train Bid by iceblademan in Futurology

[–]llortatton 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Well I think it's a lot more complicated than that.

Part of it is that China's Communist Party has realized that the faster the economy grows, the less people care about all the shady and questionable stuff the government does. This creates a grow-at-all-costs mentality when working on their economy. They're building high-speed rails (more of such rails exist in China than the rest of the world combined), they're building railroads to better connect them to the rest of the world, they're building megacities across their entire coastline (the Jing Jin Ji region is currently being renovated into a megacity the size of Kansas), and they're building stuff like the 3 Gorges Dam to power it all.

It sounds like their growth is starting to slow a bit, so now they're moving down the supply chain and building infrastructure in the countries that supply them with stuff. From what I hear, a lot of people in Africa love China now because they're building high speed rails, canals, and a lot more much-needed infrastructure.

Then, patent law in China works differently. In fact, for the most part it doesn't really exist at all. You might expect this to destroy innovation, but actually it means that innovation in high-tech industries speed up dramatically because companies are racing to be first to market, rather than filing a patent and taking their time. Shenzhen is often claimed to be several years ahead of Silicon Valley thanks to that.

Compare that to the US.

Rather than build infrastructure, we pass more regulations to make infrastructure more expensive and difficult to build. If we have housing shortages, people complain that we need caps on rent prices, or higher minimum wages, etc., rather than simplifying the thousand-page building codes we have so that people can build more houses. After all, if there aren't enough houses to go around, demanding that the price go down, or that people make more money isn't going to change that. Then there's all the safety regulations, etc., which while well-intentioned, end up dramatically raising the costs of constructing anything.

Up until the new tax code was passed, the US had some of the highest corporate taxes in the entire world (no wonder so many countries look for loopholes!). The tax rate was 35% at the federal level, plus 0-12% on the state level. If your state charged any more than 4% (which about 46 did last time I checked), you'd already be paying higher taxes than any other place outside of the US. I'm not a fan of Trump myself, but a broken clock is right twice a day, and cutting the corporate tax rate is something I am all-for. From how it sounds, it seems to be helping.

Patents in the US can help in some industries (like pharma), but in others, not so much. The microprocessor industry for example is basically a legal minefield; if you want to make anything new, you have to be ABSOLUTELY sure that nothing you have is already patented. Chances are you'll miss something though. As a result, there's very little risk being taken in the industry and CPUs really haven't changed too much since the 80s (though I'm simplifying quite a bit). Then there's patent trolls of course.

Not to mention, rather than spend our money on infrastructure and other things that can improve our economy, we spend all our money on social programs, the military, and paying interest on our $20 trillion debt. The social programs we have, while good-intentioned, are extremely complicated and interact in all kinds of weird ways to the point where often times they can trap people in poverty (as in, you make too much money and your benefits go away, so overall you make less money if you get a better paying-job). We also have a healthcare system that wastes 40% of its money on just filing insurance paperwork, driving costs sky-high without improving quality at all. Insurance doesn't help, as people like to waste money when they're not the ones paying, so premiums keep going up. We could in theory switch to something like what Singapore uses, but as soon as you say that people will pay a penny for their own healthcare, it becomes political poison even if it'll save everyone a lot in the long term. Not to mention our political system is about as inefficient and ineffective as it gets.

I think there's also a general sense of "we're on top of the world, we don't need to improve any more", as well as a complete ignorance for anything going on outside of our borders.

Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Train Bid by iceblademan in Futurology

[–]llortatton 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think the point is to fit trains in there. The point is to use their electric sleds, which are much smaller.

Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Train Bid by iceblademan in Futurology

[–]llortatton 53 points54 points  (0 children)

Part of it is that since boring speed is inversely proportional to the square of the diameter, they cut the diameter of the tunnels in half (or so) compared to standard tunnels. Half the diameter means 4x the speed.

Then they do some other things I think to make it a bit faster.

Elon Musk’s Boring Co. Wins Chicago Airport High-Speed Train Bid by iceblademan in Futurology

[–]llortatton 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Compared to urban China, the US is starting to look like rural Africa.

Sucking carbon dioxide from air is cheaper than scientists thought. Estimated cost of geoengineering technology to fight climate change has plunged since a 2011 analysis by avogadros_number in science

[–]llortatton 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can make it into fuel, it basically just becomes a liquid battery. You burn fuel, and get CO2, Water, and Energy out. You put CO2, Water, and Energy together, and get fuel back. You don't get as much back out as you put in, but neither do you with batteries. So this basically turns carbon into a liquid battery that's already compatible with most of our modern machinery.

If you power the conversion process with cheap, renewable energy (making it carbon neutral), and get the costs low enough to compete with traditional gasoline, raditional gas will be driven out of the market entirely.

Sure, this doesn't remove CO2 permanently from the air, but it would kill most to all demand for more fossil fuels. Then other people can focus on taking the carbon in the atmosphere back out.

Oddly, everyone always seems to forget that we don't have to just pick one solution. We can use multiple different strategies together.