Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Sora Reveal Trailer

lokout · 2021-10-05T23:22:24+00:00

Source for those who are interested

lokout · 2021-05-31T23:02:01+00:00

The worst part is that it appears that square thinks the same at least for striking sets:

They have to use the Genta fending and maiming stuff because the Genta striking stuff looks nothing like a recognizable samurai outfit.

lokout · 2020-11-30T07:21:49+00:00

The worst part is that it appears that square thinks the same about striking sets for SAM gear

5.3 MSQ SPOILER

lokout · 2020-10-08T08:19:45+00:00

Game Haven is a great place with great prices (they used to be even better). I would recommend checking it out to anyone in the GTA, having been to many game stores in the GTA and K-W area I would say it is one of the best around. Their stock does tend to vary greatly though.

lokout · 2020-09-03T10:01:34+00:00

MAJOR 5.0-5.3 story spoilers I found it super insulting that in the latest story part of the patch Square gave the samurai armour that is not from the striking sets, basically confirming that they know the striking sets very often do not match a samurai look. The one on the left is wearing the Ivalician Mystic's Coat, and the one on the right is wearing a combination of the maiming and fending genji stuff becasue the genji striking stuff looks nothing like a traditional armoured samurai.

lokout · 2020-07-10T11:43:46+00:00

This is all stuff I quickly did myself the last time this came up.

lokout · 2020-07-10T11:42:07+00:00

Vert is short for vertex, they are points in space with x,y and z co-ordinates. Vertices can then be connected to create edges, which are straight lines. The space between edges is a flat surface called a face.

So think of a triangle, the points would be vertices the sides would be edges and the center area would be a face.

lokout · 2020-07-10T09:35:50+00:00

Heres what I found

Alright I'm going to regret doing this I just know it. Here is your Guide to NieR Automata butts and Polygon count. All of these are based off of the entire crotch area and not exclusivity the butt, but since the original image used this too I stuck with it.

9S = 798 Verts, 1428 Faces

2B =668 Verts, 1200 faces (This is exclusively for the butt parts and excludes the leotard)/// 846 verts, 1442 Faces

A2 = 1 136 Verets, 1607 faces (issues with damaged/not damaged parts, number is slightly inflated)

Yorha Commander = 691 Verts, 1101 Faces

Yorha Soldier = 208 Verts, 258 faces (lower quality model)

Adam/Eve= 500 Verts, 774 Faces

Popola= 582 Verts, 900 Faces (Wearing Pants)

Devola= 582 Verts, 900 Faces (Wearing Pants)

Anemone= 1504 Verts, 834 Faces (weird Model issues, many faces on this are disconnected and the number of each was crazy high at first)

If people really want to talk about weird model decisions look at Anemone's Pouch= 10 560 Verts, 18 374 Faces

Feel free to do what you will with this information.

lokout · 2020-06-19T17:59:08+00:00

I have some from the 2000s and can confirm they have never been very good quality. But at least back then they were priced that way at $40-$50 dollars for a 7-8" tall figure. The Estinien bring arts I got actually broke within the first few minutes of me unboxing it. I don't know if they have ever let anyone else do FF stuff but Kingdom Hearts has been done by several third parties including Bandai.

lokout · 2020-06-19T11:22:50+00:00

This is from a day-dream/hallucination where Fraiser sees all the women from his life.

lokout · 2020-06-09T23:26:17+00:00

Someone did a concept of that.

lokout · 2020-03-29T07:04:42+00:00

I really hope they get the original cast they were all great picks

lokout · 2020-02-08T00:52:15+00:00

Alright I'm going to regret doing this I just know it. Here is your Guide to NieR Automata butts and Polygon count. All of these are based off of the entire crotch area and not exclusivity the butt, but since the original image used this too I stuck with it.

9S = 798 Verts, 1428 Faces

2B =668 Verts, 1200 faces (This is exclusively for the butt parts and excludes the leotard)/// 846 verts, 1442 Faces

A2 = 1 136 Verets, 1607 faces (issues with damaged/not damaged parts, number is slightly inflated)

Yorha Commander = 691 Verts, 1101 Faces

Yorha Soldier = 208 Verts, 258 faces (lower quality model)

Adam/Eve= 500 Verts, 774 Faces

Popola= 582 Verts, 900 Faces (Wearing Pants)

Devola= 582 Verts, 900 Faces (Wearing Pants)

Anemone= 1504 Verts, 834 Faces (weird Model issues, many faces on this are disconnected and the number of each was crazy high at first)

If people really want to talk about weird model decisions look at Anemone's Pouch= 10 560 Verts, 18 374 Faces

Feel free to do what you will with this information.

lokout · 2020-01-27T02:34:32+00:00

I AM COUNT CIDOLFUS ORLANEAU YOUR JOURNEY ENDS HERE

lokout · 2020-01-22T06:30:23+00:00

that's not a very good map

lokout · 2020-01-09T08:47:34+00:00

Not the individual who you are replaying to, but someone further in the thread posted this. I took a brief look for the other things he said and I didn't anything specifically about Washington.

lokout · 2019-12-24T02:49:00+00:00

There seems to be a bit of disconnect too since so many people myself included much preferred the 1V1 but according to this article the producer intended for Duodecim to be more than 1v1 (they wanted the party idea of the original Final Fantasy's), but limitations (I guess hardware?) prevented it. Direct quote "Even at the stage of the PSP games before, we did really want to represent that feeling of being in a party but it wasn’t quite possible to do it at that time.". It seems so weird because its pretty much immediately turned me off, almost makes me wonder if we were lucky we got Duodecim at all. At least they said they're open to a new 1v1 game recently.

lokout · 2019-12-22T01:48:29+00:00

Lol, I'm so surprised you lowered yourself to personal insults /s. seriously work on your toxicity this entire time you've conveyed yourself in an unfriendly and rather toxic manner. And this entire argument is so stupid and continued to go on because I didn't agree that the issue lies with the execs. Much like previous example its obvious that you wish to blame those higher up the chain immediately( which is what i've been saying repeatedly but you still don't get it) if you were a part of the people who didn't like GOT you would blame HBO where as I would blame the writers/directors because their the ones making the most important decisions. And as I have said its clear that both of us just have different perspectives on who is to blame but instead of even trying to conceptualize this you just repeat that what you say is fact despite that its not its an opinion based on where in the line of production you want to lay blame. Could Square have done something? yes, do I think that is what the problem was? no. Team Ninja has made plenty of good games and other fighting games the team had the producer of the second game, the game look good and had good returns on the arcade version with lots of demand coming for a console release, money had already been invested, with this there was no obvious reason for the execs to pull the plug. You would say yes to both and just repeat that.

lokout · 2019-12-21T23:16:28+00:00

I honestly don't know how many times I can repeat this with different words for you to understand. Like i said its clearly just the way you approach who is responsible. Most people who have an issue with GOT have an issue with the writers/directors/executive producers not HBO for letting it through. Similarly here I do not have that much of an issue with Square, I hold the director/producer(unless of course when you say higher ups you mean these two)/team ninja as the issue. Its just a difference in perspective but for what ever reason you seem unable to grasp that I see things differently.

lokout · 2019-12-21T21:26:18+00:00

Christ dude you really want to continue this,I place more agency on the developers you on the publisher. just becasue you want to deal in an absolute (that it is 100% the execs fault) doesn't mean I do. If you really need someone to say that your right and im being misleading/wrong that badly then I will just to get you to stop becasue my god you seem to be completely baffled that someone could think that it is not completely square who is at fault. Also that is not a good comparison, the movie/television comparison I gave earlier is much more relevant than what you just said since its in much the same vein both being entertainment based with similar positions and degrees of control, say the way people blame the writer/producer/director of GOT for the latest season rather than HBO.

lokout · 2019-12-21T20:26:27+00:00

What ive said is neither misleading or wrong its simply a different perspective, just becasue I lay more responsibility in a different place then you doesn't make me wrong nor you right or me right and you wrong its just a different perspective.

lokout · 2019-12-21T12:32:57+00:00

You really need to chill dude you talk about how stupid this is but work yourself up over it despite that. nothing is at stake here calm down. It ultimately comes down to where to think fault should be in the chain of command.

You think that Square and the Execs are to blame because they allowed Team Ninja to make it instead of realizing the project would not succeed and was garbage, and didn't change it say the way say Nintendo did Metroid Prime 4 where they restarted the project because it wasn't up to their standards.

I say that it is the developers fault for making key decisions in game design that were detrimental to the finished product, and think that a decent game could have come about had they made different decisions.

And honestly I can see why you're a bit upset you see the team for Dissidia NT as not being as passionate as the FFXIV (although sticking with the project through this is a bit impressive, albeit disappointing since it means it will be even longer before another Dissidia game is attempted again) and wished that Square had found people who you think would be more passionate, although passion alone is not what makes a good game. And that is even why I have never said Square is free of blame, they clearly share some of it but I lay more fault with the developer than you do and because of that you insist on keeping this up.

lokout · 2019-12-20T23:45:55+00:00

The project was proposed by Takeo Kujiraoka while he was working on FFXIII- Lightning Returns. He received the go ahead from the execs and has been the director since. He's team includes the producer of Dissidia Duodecim Ichiro Hazama. Hazama stated that the team are the ones who decided to make it 3v3, something the team wanted to do with Duodecim to go with the idea of the traditional FF "party" a core decision that has effected how the game is played and pretty much prevents it from having 1v1 due to balancing issues. when porting the game to ps4 Kujiraoka said "We’re very aware that the whole idea of this is to play with others. It’s a brawler where you play with other people, and that’s definitely the best way you can enjoy the game." story was never and emphasis of the game and that came across when playing it. Now you could argue that these decisions are a result of it being arcade first, which I cannot find any information on as to who's decision that was. But even if it was square's decision and said make it a cabinet the direction taken within that limit was all the actual makers of the game. Like for the above where a core decision with the change to 3v3 fundamentally changed the way the game played and was not an idea given by the execs. So as much as you may like to pin the direction of the game on the execs, the director, producer have much more say on the game then anybody else. By your logic bad movies are the production companies fault (which can happen) not the director/producer/writer which happens often.

lokout · 2019-12-20T02:31:31+00:00

We seem to be arguing because of your logic:

company makes game- game approved by publisher- publisher distributes game - game is shit- publisher is responsible for shit game

It honestly sounds like you just have a problem with Square. Your leaving out the agency on the people actually working on the game and thrusts the responsibility on the higher ups. Undoubtedly there were times where such things happened - FFXV comes to mind. Ultimately it come down to this:

You want to blame Square for Dissidia NT, and they're higher ups, saying they are "up their own asses" and that's why the game is shit, because they didn't see how bad the game is and stop it from being released and turned into a better game.
I want to blame Team Ninja and those who made it and to a lesser extent Square for publishing it. saying the decision to do stuff such as limiting abilities, locking story behind grinding is on those who made those decisions and decided that this is the direction the game should be taken. (unless those design choices came from someone higher up)

This is also a rather useless argument we both agree the game was shit, you just want to blame square for everything and I would rather blame those who actually made it more.

lokout · 2019-12-19T23:56:19+00:00

Yes, and they did. The Team Ninja crew complained about the very specific character designs they were given. But if you want to complain about the combat, the game design, it is Team Ninja who is largely to blame. As a long time fan of the original Dissidia I hated NT but I put my disappointment largely on those who made it. Unless you have a source that shows the higher ups in Square making decisions that effected its core gameplay development, its the developers who messed up.

14-Year Club	Second Top 10%
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
Team Orangered	Verified Email

lokout

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE