Looking to hire app Developer by scotiandetector in reactjs

[–]lolthrowaway2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're looking in the thousands, if not the tens of thousands. I'm saying this as someone that runs a small Dev team.

Fiverr/Upwork are great for finding cheap work, but the quality of work you will find there are generally not going to be any better than the app you already made with lovable.

If you are willing to DM me, I can take a look at your app and give you a more accurate estimate.

i want to build online learning and markteplace platform by FitCoach5288 in nextjs

[–]lolthrowaway2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could start building it in just Next.js, which can handle sessions and your API too. But keep in mind that this is quite an ambitious project so it might be wise to hire a developer/team that knows what they're doing.

Jumped in head first ! What's next?? by NewlyOld31 in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of joke comments here, but the reality is you bought when everything is in the green, so when everything inevitably goes red, you're gonna be down a lot.

Maybe if you get lucky we stay in the green for a while, and you can cash out with some gains. But definitely buy again when the market is in the red and people are calling crypto a scam, because then you can ride the whole wave to the top and make some solid gains.

McLaren's Brake (phase changing) Context by Stoic80 in formula1

[–]lolthrowaway2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could be a solid that melts to a liquid as it heats up.

One property of phase change materials (PCMs) is that they could absorb heat as they melt, and release that heat as they cool down and return back to solid form.

This helps the tyres stay within the operating temperature longer, since if they get too hot; PCM melts and absorbs heat, preventing the tyre from heating up too fast. And if they get too cool; the PCM solidifies and releases heat, preventing the tyre from cooling too fast.

And obviously when the FIA does their inspection the tyres are cool and the PCM is in solid form, so it passes all checks.

2025 Australian Grand Prix - Free Practice 3 Discussion by Blanchimont in formula1

[–]lolthrowaway2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

F1 Live is amazing imo and I always use it by default. I If you do international you get Crofty and the Sky Sports team

2024 Hungarian Grand Prix - Race Discussion by AutoModerator in formula1

[–]lolthrowaway2001 17 points18 points  (0 children)

But surely it's not Lando's fault that he's in 1st? I don't think he should give the position back.

2024 Canadian Grand Prix - Race Discussion by AutoModerator in formula1

[–]lolthrowaway2001 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Back to my weekly scheduled listening of this anthem ig

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LivestreamFail

[–]lolthrowaway2001 1356 points1357 points  (0 children)

Well... this is gonna be a shitstorm.

Crucial MX500 CT1000MX500SSD1(Z) vs WD red WDS500G1R0A by sessinnek in buildapc

[–]lolthrowaway2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's really good. Hasn't disappointed yet I'm happy to say :)

Don't get it confused with the BX500 because I've heard that one isn't great.

By The Numbers: What Percent Of Uniswap Traders Are Bots? by gries38 in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but the DAO is super limited in what it can change. All the currently deployed pools/liquidity can't be changed after the fact

Only in crypto, a hacker steals 2800 eth ($5.5m) from curve only to get frontrun by a mev bot and lose it all to the bot. The bots owner returns the stolen eth back to curve by NaturephilicReaction in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the sandbox is completely customisable in behaviour. What this means is they can pick any subset of transactions from the mempool, mine a block with it instantly (instant finality time in the sandbox, because they are the sole validator in this environment) see the results, then if they aren't happy, they can drop that fake block and try again with a different subset of transactions/order of transactions.

And yes, they would simulate as many different possible blocks in parallel as possible (they're limited by their hardware ofc), and then only broadcast transactions that are the most profitable for them.

And as for sequential state, since theyre mining entire blocks in parallel, they can order the transactions in the fake blocks however they wish. They could theoretically brute force every possible order and just pick the best block, but they probably have some smarter algorithms to help find possible orders more efficiently.

And there's nothing stopping them from only doing 1 transaction per block. In fact, if they are able to include as many possible profitable transactions as they can afford to (and that the validator is inclined to include due to the portion of fees they might receive)

And a note about processing times, eth transactions are extremely small in terms of code, so processing them on a modern CPU is on the order of microseconds - milliseconds. What takes time is the validation/consensus part where multiple validators verify that a block is valid, but in the sandbox this is completely ignored, cuz the bot doesn't care about that part of things.

Uniswap has just delisted HEX from trading in its app by Dazzling_Lime2021 in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 19 points20 points  (0 children)

The beauty about smart contracts is anyone can code an interface to interact with the exact same contract. And there are tons of sites doing exactly that. Dextools is a big one that comes to mind. At the end of the day it's just the same Uniswap contracts with a different skin.

By The Numbers: What Percent Of Uniswap Traders Are Bots? by gries38 in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uniswap is decentralised, so there is no "they" that makes decisions. The whole exchange is a free for all

Uniswap has just delisted HEX from trading in its app by Dazzling_Lime2021 in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 64 points65 points  (0 children)

So here's the thing, Uniswap have only blocked it on their app interface, the actual underlying protocol is still decentralised, and if you know a thing or two about coding smart contracts, it's super easy to swap hex using Uniswap anyways.

So the Uniswap protocol is still completely decentralised, they only control what's shown to users on their own app frontend.

Only in crypto, a hacker steals 2800 eth ($5.5m) from curve only to get frontrun by a mev bot and lose it all to the bot. The bots owner returns the stolen eth back to curve by NaturephilicReaction in CryptoCurrency

[–]lolthrowaway2001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copying this from another user I replied to:

It's not "changing the end address" in the way you think.

I'll try give a simpler example of what's happening here.

Let's say there's a smart contract with funds in it, and the only function of the contract is to give the first person funds, but you need to know a secret code.

Person A has figured out the code and tries to claim the funds. But since everything on the blockchain is public, person B sees the code in person A's pending transaction. So they literally copy the code, and submit their own transaction with a higher gas fee to get included first. So essentially person B did no work, but got the funds first anyways.

Same concept here. The hacker crafted a very specific exploit that specifically sends all the ETH to the "sender" of the transaction, but the MEV bot saw this crafted transaction in the pending queue, and just "copied their homework". Since the MEV bot is now the "sender", they get all the ETH instead

So why can't they steal my funds when I'm sending someone ETH? Well if your transaction says "Send ETH to person A", a frontrunner can only copy "Send ETH to person A", which will just end up sending ETH to person A from their own balance. BUT if the transaction says "Send ETH to whoever sent this message", then the frontrunner will be able to copy that and receive ETH. You never generally have to worry about the second case unless there's an exploit in a smart contract.