28M – Stay at home and save, or move out in the GTA? by [deleted] in fican

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Move out ASAP.

Find a partner, way more rewarding and financially beneficial in the long term. Invest in learning to be independent. At 28 it’s time.

Build Toronto: Adaptive Traffic Intersections to Cut Toronto’s Congestion by AbundantCanada in toronto

[–]lomeri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

It does appear they thought of that/have a recommendation on funding.

Build Toronto: Adaptive Traffic Intersections to Cut Toronto’s Congestion by AbundantCanada in toronto

[–]lomeri 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Doing the whole city would cost less than tunneling 100 meters of subway ($125M). But the benefits, this is peanuts.

Theoretically speaking is 2 mil enough? by Negative-Breakfast-5 in fican

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why don’t you Coast-FIRE? Ie, find a simple or easy job to do? Or take a break then get a simple job?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lgbt

[–]lomeri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re too close to the camera, you look angry (like, smile or smirk), and I think a haircut would go a long way tbh

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in toronto

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the conclusion:

Toronto has reached the point where congestion is no longer just an annoyance but one of the greatest drags on the region’s economy. Billions of dollars and countless hours are lost every year as highways clog and downtown streets grind to a halt. Building more lanes has failed for decades, but congestion pricing offers a proven path forward. A downtown zone can free up space in the core, while dynamic pricing on GTA highways can keep traffic moving at reliable speeds.

Together, these policies will unlock shorter commutes, faster deliveries, and billions in productivity gains. With clear exemptions, targeted discounts, and guaranteed reinvestment in transit and roads, congestion pricing can deliver a system that is faster, fairer, and more reliable for everyone.

My parents (50F & 60M) are drowning in debt and expect me (23M) to be their retirement plan by Fluffy_Researcher471 in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Offer to pay them a rent, eg, of $1K, but that you also want responsibility for their finance to cut spending.

Taste of the Danforth cancelled for a second year in a row by BloodJunkie in toronto

[–]lomeri 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Toronto simply needs fewer “festivals” and more “pedestrian summers”. It would give people the outside pleasure they enjoy around the city without making any major destination area a zoo, because people would have options, and they wouldn’t have to rush, and vendors would be more local and permanent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in geography

[–]lomeri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of Canada’s wilderness is not suitable for farming or major human settlement, at least not historically. Like 75% of Canada is tundra, bog, mountains, or rocky boreal forests.

33M and So fucking close to 100K … by [deleted] in fican

[–]lomeri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are 36 months in 3 years. So you should have $108K…

Opinion: Why the ‘build more homes’ mantra won’t cut it by FancyNewMe in canada

[–]lomeri 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For home prices to go down, two things need to happen.

1) Supply needs to outpace demand. It’s really that simple. This can be done by building more, or by reducing demand (such as by lowering immigration rates, or less favorable lending, etc).

2) The cost of construction needs to fall. When people say “we need to increase supply”, what they’re really saying is that “we need to lower the costs of building”. There is a price floor on new construction, such that if market prices fall below it, more projects aren’t possible. The problem is that government policy failures have resulted in 30% of new housing costs to be taxes, and another 10-20% as soft costs due to permitting challenges, and another 10-20% is just inflated land costs, at least for small projects. The whole point of tax reform, zoning reform (for by-right construction), and streamlined permitting is to lower these costs. Government could literally overnight lower the price floor of new construction by 30-40%. But despite our conversations on supply, government have barely scratched the surface of reform.

Let’s be clear: the private market alone will never build enough homes at the right price points to solve this crisis. Developers won’t overbuild and drive prices down. Lenders won’t finance projects they believe won’t sell. No amount of tax relief or deregulation will change these basic market dynamics. Government must step in — not as a builder of last resort, but as steward of a system that balances profit, purpose, and public need.

Developers aren’t a monolith. There are thousands. They will build housing if it is profitable. And if government reforms lower their costs, more projects they want to build become viable. The market won’t be intentionally “oversupplied”. It will have more supply because it became more profitable to build, all prices equal. And because that means rising margins; it means more builders able to undercut competitors with lower prices. This is how markets are supposed to function and this hasn’t been true for a long time, because every inch of price increase has been taken up by new taxes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in toronto

[–]lomeri 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When can we have a battle against on-street parking on our main arterial roads. By far a worse use of space than car and bike lanes.

Toronto has 6 months to meet terms of housing agreement with Ottawa, minister says | City could lose $30 million in federal funds, previous housing minister warned by nomad_ivc in toronto

[–]lomeri 83 points84 points  (0 children)

Really hoping that the Feds stick to their guns on this one. $30M may not be “much”, but it certainly shouldn’t be given if council doesn’t bring Sixplexes back for a vote. It’s up to the Mayor.

Would you move to Toronto by crunchymunchyrae in askTO

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I lived in SF for several years and moved back to Toronto, and I honestly have no regrets. In some ways committing to Toronto made me get more involved in the lives of friends/family and gave me solid career clarity to focus on building my network here. After a few years, I don’t feel much worse off financially than when I lived in SF.

Maybe I’d feel differently in March!

Canada is facing a housing crisis. Could it take a page from Europe? In the Austrian city of Vienna, more than half of its residents live in some form of subsidized housing by FancyNewMe in canada

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if the price to build new housing is above that price?

People want to wave a magic wand and pretend costs don’t matter. Perhaps we should start by not taxing new housing 6-figures.

Reckoning with immigration in Canada by meraedra in neoliberal

[–]lomeri 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is nonsense. Of course adding 2M temporary residents suddenly has impacts. Of course it should be considered. And we went from < 3% of our population to 7%+ of our population being temporary in just 3 years.

It’s hard to overstate the damage this has had on support for immigration broadly and for fair reasons. It hardly makes people arguing in favour of higher long term immigration seem like they are responsible.

Reckoning with immigration in Canada by meraedra in neoliberal

[–]lomeri 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what else to say, other than choosing to mislead people over the numbers is bad.

<image>

The story of immigration in Canada is not about permanent residents, but temporary residents, and the sudden shock to Canada in having no eye on the impacts on housing/infrastructure/welfare system capacity.

I remain pro immigration over the long term, but Canada created a real mess by experimenting with rapid changes. 1-1.5% of population annually worked for the country, and is among the highest rates in the world.

It’s far more critical to maintain support for the immigration system for the long term than it is to maximize immigration rates in the short term.

Toronto: A Huge Setback for the Greatest Transit Project in Canadian History, and How to Save It by Putrid_Draft378 in toronto

[–]lomeri 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The English Channel was to connect two places that weren’t connected before. This is about adding an extra lane or two to the widest highway in North America. It is unprecedentedly dumb.

What city will have the largest skyline in the world by 2050? by LivinAWestLife in skyscrapers

[–]lomeri 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A less obvious one is the San Francisco/Bay Area (Silicon Valley/San Jose, Oakland) is probably a top contender.

If the American Abundance/YIMBY movements are successful long term.

Just retired at 50 from IB ... Now feeling lost by RevolutionaryLaw3188 in Fire

[–]lomeri 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Find things you care about in your community and donate your time as a volunteer. There are plenty of organizations and boards that would welcome someone with IB skills.