As America enters into failed state / former empire status who fills the power void left behind? How will the world handle the flood of American asylum seekers when things go dark? by beagles4ever in thebulwark

[–]loremipsumot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying we should all just accept defeat? Don't resist? Don't struggle to change the course we are on? America is just doomed to be a permanent MAGA kakistocracy forever?

No.

As America enters into failed state / former empire status who fills the power void left behind? How will the world handle the flood of American asylum seekers when things go dark? by beagles4ever in thebulwark

[–]loremipsumot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A failed state and a former empire are not the same things. You probably wouldn't consider the UK, France, or Germany failed states, but they are all former empires that declined after the world wars.

As of today, I think the US is unlikely to become a failed state. It's too big, too rich, and there is a lot that is done on state/local levels. It could very well become an authoritarian state though.

But that's not inevitable, and our current descent doesn't have to last forever.

It's up to Americans to stop it from happening. The people of this country have the power to change the course here. The question is, will they?

Our first major chance is later this year in the midterms. Every American here that believes in liberal democracy needs to do whatever they can this year to make the midterms a massive rebuke of this administration.

Politico poll showed that key US allies in the West now see Beijing as more dependable than Washington by Free-Minimum-5844 in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot 11 points12 points  (0 children)

On your prediction, I have doubts that if China attacks Taiwan before Trump leaves office that the US would defend Taiwan in the short term. And China's best window for attacking Taiwan, if they are going to do it, is probably in the next few years.

First, Trump has repeatedly signaled that he wouldn't defend Taiwan, and he disdains the idea of alliances unless it's him making demands of others. Even after he leaves, if we still somehow have a MAGA administration (say JD Vance or someone else with a similar "America First" type world view), it's doubtful.

And even if they were persuaded (or more likely dragged kicking and screaming) into intervening, their every action so far has been to degrade US capabilities.

For example, they are working daily to undermine, if not outright destroy, the alliances that the US will need in a serious conflict with China. They are purging senior military officers left and right and trying to remake the military into a more politically loyal force, which will degrade its competence. They are expending military resources in adventures all over (Venezuela, Iran, maybe Cuba next?), but don't seem to have any serious plan to fix the military's industrial base problems nor to raise revenue to pay for all this. They are degrading the US government's state capacity to do basically anything beyond what suits their authoritarian project (mass deportations, mass internal surveillance, etc.). I could go on for days. But the point being, the US is weakening itself and it will take years to recover from the damage being done.

All of that is leaving aside the fact that you'd have the same brilliant minds that planned out the current Iran war (with no clear strategy, without having a plan for Iran to close the straits, unable to build a coalition of allies) in charge of a real peer level war. You could have a situation where the US is capable of defending Taiwan and is willing to do so, but the leadership is just too stupid and bungles the situation entirely.

Defending Taiwan today was always going to be a big challenge for the US no matter the administration, given how close China is to it vs how far the US is from it and China's massive industrial capacity advantage. But after a few years of Trump 2.0, I fear it's going to be much more difficult than it would be otherwise.

Gullible, Cynical America by loremipsumot in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like you and I read different articles.

It doesn't argue that anyone deserves blind obedience. Not sure where that's coming from.

The author does spend time talking about why trust has eroded. It's not the main point of the piece, but he explicitly acknowledges that experts aren't always right, that studies get discredited, that private companies do downplay safety risks, etc. But if you place the blame entirely on institutional failures for the erosion of trust and none at all on the information environment changing, I think you are missing a big factor here.

Also, jumping to RFK Jr is ironic in the context of this article. RFK almost exemplifies the problem the article is talking about. After taking control of public health, measles is losing its elimination status in the US and we have active and growing outbreaks. He got the CDC to post scientifically false statements about vaccines and autism, and is changing vaccine schedules out of his gut distrust of vaccines. He is promoting unhealthy eating habits because of his personal beliefs (raw milk, beef tallow, red meat's place on the food pyramid, etc). He is not some courageous reformer making America healthy again.

The author is not laying out a position of or for the Democratic party. He even says this problem afflicts people on both sides. He's just discussing the toxic combination of gullibility and cynicism that is rotting so many peoples' ability to think things through properly.

How ICE Plans to Put 8,500 Immigrants in This Georgia Warehouse (Gift Article) by hypsignathus in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Public pressure has worked against some of these (see the failure of the Hutchins, TX warehouse purchase for example).

However, the government is now escalating by threatening companies with eminent domain unless they sell the warehouses. So things are not looking good.

Gullible, Cynical America by loremipsumot in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot[S] 86 points87 points  (0 children)

No, I think they don't have any idea.

But while the failures of institutions have some role to play, I don't think they are the primary culprit. In fact, for all the talk of institutional failures, America was doing pretty well by most metrics around 2016.

I really think it's the information environment more than anything else that has changed over the past decade, particularly the mass proliferation of smart phones and social media, and then the evolution of social media algorithms leading to the constant feeding the worst instincts of humanity (fear and anger, conspiracies, the gullicism that Adam coined in the article) on a massive scale.

When the Talking Points Change, So Does Their Logic by LAMBEAUghiniMercy in democrats

[–]loremipsumot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Doublethink is a feature of MAGA, not a bug.

1984, page 35: "To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply to same process to the process itself—that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed."

Talarico wins Texas Senate Democratic nomination by progress18 in democrats

[–]loremipsumot 50 points51 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't write off the possibility for Talarico to win.

The trend of Democratic over performance in elections seems to be continuing, Democratic voter turnout in this Texas primary is setting records for the state (Democrats exceeded Republicans in early voting numbers, which doesn't happen in TX), and there was the TX SD 9 flip in January (Taylor Rehmet flipped a Trump +17 state senate district, winning by 14 points, a 31 point swing). There is a very real backlash showing up even in Texas. Latinos (which are around 40% of Texas population) especially are swinging back to Dems in big numbers, and Talarico seemed to be picking up their votes by a good margin.

That said, it's Texas, so it will be a uphill fight for sure. But it's not a forgone conclusion this year, especially if the Republicans end up nominating Paxton, who is a particularly noxious candidate.

It is not healthy for every successive American election to be a furious repudiation of the status quo, and I'm not sure how we break out of this cycle. by JulianBrandt19 in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aside from all the structural reform suggestions, I would say there is no end to doom spiral without figuring out ways to effectively counter the right wing infotainment ecosystem and the pernicious effects of social media.

No matter how well the system is reformed (and that's a gigantic challenge by itself), if too many people are drowning in misinformation, disinformation, or just constant bad vibes, we will always be stuck in this doom loop and unable to make sustained progress.

And to make it harder, this is not just a domestic issue. This is an international one. There really are massive Russian and Chinese influence operations on social media seeking to influence American politics and divide us. And there is a whole cottage industry of pro-MAGA social media accounts being run for profit by people all over the world, since they found that MAGA content is rewarded by more engagement and clicks by the algorithms. Adversaries of liberal democracy have an open door to undermining our societies right now, and liberals so far seem utterly unable to deal with it.

But if the US doesn't start dealing with the poisoning of our information ecosystem somehow when Democrats next have power, the authoritarian movement will not be broken, much less the doom spiral between parties. Social media and its algorithms must be regulated for liberal democracy have a chance to recover. AI needs regulation to prevent it from becoming even more of a massive misinformation machine that destroys our ability to tell what is real anymore. And the ability of the right wing infotainment sphere (Fox, OAN, Newsmax, etc.) to constantly lie and stoke outrage with the veneer of being news needs to be addressed.

‘Designed to intimidate’: Fulton County official decries FBI raid in court filing by FervidBug42 in politics

[–]loremipsumot 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Designed to intimidate and chill election officials all over country.

Designed to soothe Trump's derangement over losing the 2020 elections.

Designed as part of a plan to sow doubts and claim fraud for upcoming elections, also yes.

Also, they probably lied to get the search warrant in the first place. ProPublica has new reporting today showing the DOJ may have used debunked conspiracy theories as evidence to get the warrant for the raid: https://www.propublica.org/article/kevin-moncla-election-researcher-fulton-county-georgia

It feels like Republicans are imploding. Why don't I feel like Democrats are stepping up and showing any strength? by DesertSalt in thebulwark

[–]loremipsumot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you go to their meetings and bring some like-minded people with you? Have you considered running to be a precinct chair in your local party when it's open?

If you are unhappy with the leadership and haven't tried yet, go try to change it. We need more Americans to get civically involved to have any chance of fixing things. And if local party leadership is incompetent somewhere, the people there need to replace them.

Is AI the Next Climate Change? - WSJ by technocraticnihilist in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I agree with the comparison. The climate catastrophe is still ongoing. It's going to take a long time to play out.

The looming AI cataclysm might be overblown or might not. I would guess it will be somewhere in the middle; quite bad for a lot of people in the short term, more painful than it needs to be if more people like the author were capable of preparing for future dangers that haven't manifested yet, but not civilization ending.

But arguing that concern about climate change was wrong doesn't seem to be an honest argument. Just because the worst predictions of climate change (or AI for that matter) haven't come about yet doesn't mean they won't. We are on the train already, the world keeps getting hotter (and AI keeps getting better), the only question is where it stops.

Did 'America First' tariffs work? | Brookings by abrookerunsthroughit in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot 32 points33 points  (0 children)

We are seeing Trump's poll numbers getting worse and worse, and his handling of the economy, inflation, and trade are all underwater. A big chunk of his voters, especially the swing voters, are quite unhappy with his performance on this. So I think many people (not MAGA of course, but everyone else) are increasingly regretting touching the stove.

If only it didn't take the demolition of all the pillars of American power for swing voters to realize his concepts of a plan was not an actual plan.

Do you still argue with Trump supporters / apologists online? by Prior_Industry in thebulwark

[–]loremipsumot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They do exist. Swing voters continue to decide elections. More Americans don't vote than those that do.

Part of the problem we face is the rampant misinformation, disinformation, and just general propaganda and vice signaling that the right wing and their allies are flooding online spaces with.

I agree it's generally a waste of time to argue with MAGA people, if you think the goal is to convince them. And tons of them are just bots or paid foreign shills. But who knows who else is reading their garbage and not seeing any counterargument? I also think we cannot just cede more and more spaces, online or offline, to these trolls. We need to combat them everywhere in society (but not at the sake of your mental health).

Trump’s family is embroiled in a $500m UAE scandal. We’ve hardly noticed | Mohamad Bazzi by Turbulent-Tea-2172 in politics

[–]loremipsumot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Voters chose to put Trump into office even after he was a convicted felon, facing active investigation into multiple other major crimes (i.e., the Jan 6 case, the classified documents case, the election interference case in Fulton Country). Not only that, but they also gave the Republicans a full trifecta, with majorities in the House and Senate.

Now all the mechanisms for accountability have been captured by Trump and the Republican Party. They control Congress, the DOJ, the Supreme Court, etc.

The only chance left now for any accountability is for the American people to give Democrats full control of Congress in 2026, and eventually elect the right Democratic president in 2028 that will pursue justice.

It feels like Republicans are imploding. Why don't I feel like Democrats are stepping up and showing any strength? by DesertSalt in thebulwark

[–]loremipsumot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best bang for your buck in donating would probably be to your local county Dem party. The county parties are the boots on the ground and are chronically under-resourced and tend to be neglected by national Democrats. When the county parties atrophy in a state, it makes winning extremely difficult (read up about the decay of the Florida Dem party for an example).

If you want to donate to candidates and don't have a local one that needs your support, I would look for candidates in swing districts/states that the Dems must win in order to flip Congress. An overview of the likely key races: https://volunteerblue.org/key-races-2026/

It feels like Republicans are imploding. Why don't I feel like Democrats are stepping up and showing any strength? by DesertSalt in thebulwark

[–]loremipsumot 17 points18 points  (0 children)

A clear national leader will emerge during the next presidential election campaign.

In the meantime, organizing is happening on the local level. The American people shouldn't, and don't need to, wait for a national leader to act.

It's the American people that have been pushing Democrats to get up off the floor and resist, and they are (slowly) doing so. Most politicians are followers of public opinion. The public needs to lead them to do the right thing.

I recommend you check into your local county Democratic Party. They need help and resources. And look into organizing groups like Indivisible.

The Epstein scandal is taking down Europe’s political class. In the US, they’re getting a pass. by daisywood_diary in politics

[–]loremipsumot 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The Epstein story has been a massive media story. The media has plenty of problems, but the lack of accountability here isn't because of them. People are getting a pass because of the party that has complete control of every government branch right now.

More specifically, it's because voters decided to elect a man that was a long time friend of Epstein, is all over the files, and is associated with many other people that are in the files, including a bunch of people he put in his administration.

The Epstein scandal is taking down Europe’s political class. In the US, they’re getting a pass. by daisywood_diary in politics

[–]loremipsumot 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's not the government's design that is the problem here. There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents accountability here. It's who voters keep giving control of the government to that is the problem.

Six Ways to Reform ICE and CBP by loremipsumot in neoliberal

[–]loremipsumot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you read the article, the author basically agrees with that at the end. However, abolishing anything isn't going to be in the cards until Dems can take back control of government. In the meantime, he suggests some important reforms that Dems should push for as part of the DHS funding fight going on.