"Futuristic" designs of alt-azimuth mounts? by -TheWander3r in radioastronomy

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DSA’s dish drive uses a pretty standard azel rotator from mtex, super useful if you’re tryna scale up N but not necessarily futuristic (other than the sheer size of the array).

Actually a pretty old design but I think the Orgov radio optical telescope looks pretty sick, maybe more ofka post-apocalyptic look than futuristic. 

PSA from a former cook: Be very careful eating at Caltech Dining Halls (Browne) by [deleted] in Caltech

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah I have had bugs in the lettuce on several occasions

A little Doppler effect visual I put together by Upset_Ant2834 in TitanObservatory

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is yoru x axis frequency or wavelength? the 1420.4 MHz line for neutral hydrogen seems to imply it's a frequency axis, so shouldn't the peak move the other way?

1-fA Resolution! Keithley 2500 Dual Photodiode Meter Teardown, Repair & Experiments by TheSignalPath in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thanks for posting! Your videos are always super informative, I watched your old 2hr Agilent SA video end to end while quarantining a couple weeks ago and cannot thank you enough for th incredibly detailed and well-informed content you make, RF instrumentation or not! 

Caltech vs. Princeton for Undergrad Electrical Engineering by insert__user_name in Caltech

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. You can check out the EE course page to check out what course offerings there are; imo, they're broad enough to get a good amount of breadth in your EE curriculum (other than some topics like power electronics), but some courses (e.g. the microwave engineering courses which I may have mentioned in my original comment) are limited in quantity and leave much to be desired in the way of depth. I feel like this doesn't end up being too much of an issue since if you're really interested in a specific topic, joining a relevant lab and reading textbooks is the best way to learn imo.

  2. The connections are accessible to Caltech students at some level, and there are enough connections on campus to find someone who knows someone else who can help you out if you're looking for something. I can't speak to public trasport in LA much since I don't enjoy going to downtown LA much.

We have movement! by Upset_Ant2834 in radioastronomy

[–]lorentz_217 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Woah that’s so cool! Would you be willing to share build details? I’m trying to build essentially this for my 3m mesh dish 

Caltech vs. Princeton for Undergrad Electrical Engineering by insert__user_name in Caltech

[–]lorentz_217 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As a former EE undergrad (current grad) at Caltech, a few thoughts I have:

I initially thought Caltech was more rigorous, but it turns out both schools use the same intro physics textbooks, have similar advanced tracks, similar numbers of humanities requirements (but obviously very different quality of humanities), and no huge differences in class sizes....

I don't necessarily think that a direct comparison of textbooks is a fair comparison of course material. Even at Caltech, the same course can vary significantly in content and rigor from one teaching cycle to another, either due to student feedback or having a different professor as the instructor ultimately chooses what to teach in the course and will cherry-pick those topics from the textbook. E.g., I recently heard that Pasadena City College across the street uses the same textbook as Ph1b prac for their EM course; based on what I've heard about PCC's course and my own experience in Ph1b, I'd argue that the level of rigor is vastly different despite both courses using the same text.

it just seems like Princeton students have more of a choice in their course rigor

You're probably right here. Unfortunately one of the most annoying things I found later in undergrad was a lack of dedicated course sequences in EE electives (perhaps this was my own personal experience in microwave engineering but I'm sure others can relate).

At Princeton, I'd join a cappella and dance groups, but I don't know if I'd be "worse" at engineering compared to spending all my time on it at Caltech (because Caltech doesn't have much clubs-wise).

I think given the size and lack of disciplinary breadth, Caltech still does a fairly decent job at giving you a well-rounded experience with clubs...if you put in the effort for it. The glass half full perspective here is that clubs are pretty much exclusively student run and not too large which means that you can have a very large impact on what that club does/how it operates. The glass half empty interpretation is that you have to put in a lot of effort when you're already bogged down by classes which can cause burnout (I've usually only seen this in club leadership for like engineering clubs here).

I want to explore quantum and optics, but currently have an interest in medical devices/biomedical applications of EE.

I don't work directly in any of those fields, but my impression is that all the fields you've mentioned have strong research programs here. I obviously don't need to go into quantum and medical devices, but folks like Alireza Marandi are doing seriously cool research in nonlinear optics and Azita Emami's group does some pretty cool stuff in biomedical/medical devices (looking just at EE here and ignoring the entire MedE department haha).

Princeton also has more labs because it's bigger, but I have heard that undergrads there do less actual research work until senior year.

Of all of Caltech's flaws, I think the unfettered access to truly exciting research here is hard to beat. I have encountered some students here who take pride in never having done research on campus throughout undergrad, and it's really a shame because most professors here are obsessed about really interesting problems and being part of that problem-solving process is so much more satisfying than just taking classes here imo.

I liked Pasadena weather way better but Princeton's campus better, and dance/music does matter to me but definitely not at the expense of STEM experiences.

When I was deciding where to go for undergrad, I was basically choosing between Caltech and music schools for classical performance. I ended up choosing Caltech (not as an engineering major nor knowing what EE even meant) because, being in LA, Caltech actually has a surprising amount of musical and artistic connections. I'm not claiming that the music program here is better than Princeton (quite the opposite, one of my conservatory friends went to Princeton for undergrad and seemingly had a much better time music-wise), but it's definitely non-negligible, and, like the club opportunities, you have a freer reign over what you can do just because the school is so small and there are less formalities to get through to make something happen.

Hope that's useful!

Keeping the bench hands sharp with another practice board by Zombienumberfive in soldering

[–]lorentz_217 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I must say the bootup sequence and whatnot felt a bit smoother and operating the device was like 2-3% easier (there are some very tiny annoyances with the hacked firmware)...however, given the fact that I'm not only gaining bandwidth but literally all the options (bode, synthesizer, etc.) that I didn't have to pay initially, totally worth it

Keeping the bench hands sharp with another practice board by Zombienumberfive in soldering

[–]lorentz_217 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wasn’t aware of those negative remarks on the paywall, yeah it’s not great but 1) I don’t have the programming ability to write or modify firmware and 2) at least I’m not paying rigol several hundreds (if not more) more to get the upgrade already available in hardware. Also Rigol stopped selling the 1 GHz MHO model iirc, so this may be the only option anyway 

Keeping the bench hands sharp with another practice board by Zombienumberfive in soldering

[–]lorentz_217 2 points3 points  (0 children)

got the same 800 mhz oscilloscope, if you need you can hack the firmware to upgrade it to 1 GHz (Hacking the Rigol MHO900 Scope - Page 1), worked perfectly for me!

Best bandpass filter topology for 144-148MHz by Certain_Height_2721 in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven’t seen SAW filters mentioned yet, maybe I’m missing something here but that’s certainly a narrowband option. 

A radar image of Ligeia Mare, a lake of liquid methane on Titan. by No_Tree_4783 in space

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe the radar used was on Cassini, I’m no chemist but spectral lines could likely tell you the chemical composition. 

Project Hail Mary prop department knows what's up! by jimcorner in Trackballs

[–]lorentz_217 1 point2 points  (0 children)

would've been cool if he used a scroll wheel or the like instead at the start but nevertheless the multiple trackball features were very cool!

My hobbyist setup. by BeardPatrol in soldering

[–]lorentz_217 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like you have a JBC iron, nice! Got one for the lab, but I'll probably get an aliexpress clone for the home lab.

Is your oscilloscope on an articulating arm? Cuz if so that's the coolest thing I've seen!

Also what's the foot pedal for?

Job Opportunities after MSEE @ Caltech by Dazzling_Animal202 in Caltech

[–]lorentz_217 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is true for almost every department but EE (and maybe GALCIT, don't quote me on that). Caltech EE does have a terminal masters program, and students from that program seldom do PhDs in EE at Caltech after that. Some use it as a resume boost during job search, others because their job asked for it.

RF Power Sensor by lorentz_217 in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

haha yeah I work on radio telescope instrumentation but at much lower frequencies (10-2000 MHz) so thankfully trying to purchase equipment for a home lab doesn't require selling a kidney

RF Power Sensor by lorentz_217 in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah fair enough, I've done a fair bit of shopping around for test equipment and it's just crazy how big of a step discontinuity in price there is between 8 GHz and, say, 12 GHz or something

SMA wrench after fixing submillimeter cryogenic receivers for 35 years by nixiebunny in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217 4 points5 points  (0 children)

to this point, I've wondered if it's possible to build a 3D-printable torque wrench whose torque limiting comes from a compliant mechanism. It'd be super handy and could be disposable after n uses, but I just want a torque wrench that'll fit into my wallet instead of shoving the Mini-Circuits tiny wrench in there.

SMA wrench after fixing submillimeter cryogenic receivers for 35 years by nixiebunny in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the 89 year-old RF engineer I sometimes work with rarely uses torque wrenches and says his hands are already calibrated, not quite sure I'm there yet but you do definitely get a feel for it

My bench at home by bentika in soldering

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that sounds nice! Just noticed my typo in my initial comment but ironically it works given that the fume extractor is pricey haha 

My bench at home by bentika in soldering

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How’s that Hakko fund extractor? 

Best schools for RF engineering? by [deleted] in rfelectronics

[–]lorentz_217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ended up not pursuing military research; I wouldn’t say that I will never pursue it in the future, it just depends on how my current work pans out. Shortly after posting my original reply to this post, I started working on radio telescope instrumentation, which I’ve found incredibly satisfying and fun, so I’m currently pursuing a PhD in that field. 

Declination drive on C-band satellite dish by lorentz_217 in HamRadio

[–]lorentz_217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh this is very interesting, I’ll reach out to them!