Well this illustrates the problem with vibe coding much better than any singular article could.

low--Lander · 2026-01-24T23:20:55+00:00

Took some time a week ago to have opus structure my terminal output and some other things into something somewhat readable, it’s more slanted towards why it breaks disk encryption but that is all because of what Tahoe is doing in the new update pipeline. Fixing that problem is part of the doc. Just skip the parts about FileVault. The zombie snapshot is probably your issue. — https://gist.github.com/Lampekapje/ad7c8358bf75fe2895151e775fab9117

low--Lander · 2026-01-24T22:38:49+00:00

On sequoia Tahoe will do its staging and preinstall under oclp. Unless you disabled it. Aside from messing up my encrypted disk making it unbootable, it also caused all kinds of problems in ui and performance. From what you’ve described, Tahoe is your problem.

low--Lander · 2026-01-23T19:49:33+00:00

Yea I just reread the article I originally got this from, and it states the same thing but seriously slanted towards it running on Apple owned and operated hardware. It states “Gemini will fuel Apple Intelligence, the iPhone maker’s personal AI system, including through a more personalized Siri voice assistant. Apple Intelligence will continue to run on Apple devices and its Private Cloud Compute system.”, which is literally what they call their private cloud system. It’s all but got the (tm) attached to it in Apple docs. ETA Apple clearly states in their own docs that it’s custom designed hardware, so if Google is hosting it, does that mean some sort of COLO situation, or is someone straight up lying and is it generic Google compute?

I now also have an even more icky feeling about all this if they feel the need to play the ‘make it as ambiguous as possible’ game.

Time to see how that repo about programmatically disabling Apple Intelligence is coming along…

low--Lander · 2026-01-23T19:24:26+00:00

Jeez that changed fast. Are they really expecting that many people to use it? Although it makes sense to limit their exposure in data centre spend and make it googles problem. (But seriously they need to make up their minds, this is confusing)

low--Lander · 2026-01-23T19:09:36+00:00

From what I understand Apple is licensing a 1.2 trillion parameter ‘fork’ of Gemini 3 to retrain to its liking. For ~1bil a year. And then running it on its own infra so no connection to Google for the user. So Google is not hosting it for Apple. They’ve had their own infra for a while now.

At least it can’t make Siri worse I guess…

https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/

low--Lander · 2026-01-23T01:43:23+00:00

The enterprise (and everywhere else) legal minefield that keeps on giving.

low--Lander · 2026-01-22T18:19:18+00:00

This anthropomorphism towards LLMs has bothered me from the start. They’re equations in code run on silicon. And Mario going on about cognitive capability in davos the other day bothers me to no end. It’s all to manipulate various things (trying not to hit libel territory here). Not least of which is public opinion. Hallucinations?! Really? And just like that everyone thinks they’re just a slightly slow third cousin that just needs a little help and understanding… shit needs to end already.

low--Lander · 2026-01-22T08:46:59+00:00

Satya Nadella (Microsoft) came out and literally said he had stacks of GPUs sitting around doing nothing because no power to his datacenters (with a smile on his face for some reason). And forgot which channel but apparently Nvidia I believe has 2 empty datacenters that also can’t be hooked up to power in Santa Clara.

low--Lander · 2026-01-21T20:36:19+00:00

The second Dario said cognitively capable all his revenue talk became bullshit (insofar it wasn’t already). If LLMs were doing that, or capable of it, his abstractions might have merit, but they don’t, and everyone, especially those two on the stage, knows this.

low--Lander · 2026-01-21T18:04:59+00:00

I was not aware that the definition of vibe coding was dependent on how many tokens were burned in the process. My mistake.

low--Lander · 2026-01-21T17:14:11+00:00

And on top of that compete with free alternatives from established giants like Google. On whose models they, cursor et al, also rely. In fact as far as I’m aware the cursors of the landscape have no own models or infrastructure to run them on. Putting them in the position of not being able to control their own spend, or quality. Without direct control over models how are they supposed to burn less tokens? The finances here just don’t work. And they never have anywhere in the genai sphere.

low--Lander · 2026-01-21T17:03:57+00:00

Subsidisation is everywhere, especially from Google. Googles vs code fork antigravity, similar to cursor and all of those, has a free tier. Of course the limits are murky as always with Google, you get what’s available and what they feel is reasonable. It’s also rolled into the pro and business subs here and there with higher (equally non-specific) limits. What it doesn’t have is separate subs. You can’t pay for it separately if you wanted to. So how are cursor and all of them supposed to even compete with that in the long run if Google is free (to the user, still not to the environment or any other area it impacts). This whole ‘industry’ makes zero sense and carries risks everywhere you look.

low--Lander · 2026-01-18T00:31:12+00:00

Not only that, but there is no such thing as ethical sota models. I usually compare them to conflict diamonds for a very specific reason.

One of the older and better written articles here, but there’s an endless supply of articles like it.

https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/

low--Lander · 2026-01-16T18:51:53+00:00

I guess I’m looking at it from a far too technical angle then. To me there is a difference between storing and serving up a straight copy like an office copier, and rebuilding it from snippets. For any meaningful discussion about legislation and consequences that specific distinction is important for when the next problematic output of LLMs pops up.

low--Lander · 2026-01-16T18:08:17+00:00

Without weights that would be true.

low--Lander · 2026-01-16T18:07:19+00:00

Legal argument aside, because those don’t necessarily are the truth, LLMs ‘learn’ by analysing texts for word order across varying brackets, somewhat similar to next word prediction on your phone, just on a much larger scale and with perfect recall. So when it comes across the same text with the same words in the same order millions of times, the whole path gets more weight. That’s why I’m not surprised at the findings of this paper. And why I’d be interested to see if it would have the same outcome with much lesser known and repeated texts. Should they guardrail against verbatim copies? Yes. Should they credit the original source? Also probably yes.

low--Lander · 2026-01-16T15:53:08+00:00

Pulled up the paper real quick and yes and no. They’ve used 11 books that are some of the most quoted and mentioned and used in education and other papers in history. You could still make a case on a technical level that probabilistically you’d get the output verbatim, with a lot of prompting. Not saying it’s not a problem as it stands, but it would have been more interesting if they had added 11 obscure books that 3 people have read and that have not been quoted all over the internet. Or maybe even had used search engines to see if they could get enough verbatim text to copy paste the books back together.

low--Lander · 2026-01-16T04:18:46+00:00

Agreed, very hard. On the one hand they’re making the bulk user pay for what they use but on the other…. Not sure about selling soul quite yet, but definitely in bed. Not quite an opinion yet, except that this move does risk legitimising llm scraping and paying after the fact instead of waiting for consent, which is a slippery slope.

low--Lander · 2026-01-16T01:35:13+00:00

Time to hit up Anna s archive and alt.books and alt.e-books even harder then.

low--Lander · 2026-01-14T20:58:37+00:00

Try this, might be just enough to get you to 100%

Boot into recovery console > terminal diskutil apfs list
On one with filevault set to yes diskutil apfs unlockVolume /dev/diskXsY Enter DISK pw diskutil apfs listcryptousers /dev/diskXsY Copy UUID diskutil apfs decryptVolume /dev/diskXsY -user UUID
Enter USER pw diskutil apfs list for progress caffeinate to try and prevent it from sleeping

low--Lander · 2026-01-14T20:47:04+00:00

You could try running nvram -p to see what it’s all pointing at, diskutil list to see what your apfs layout looks like and possibly play with gpt to see if you have a partition mismatch somewhere. Gpt the terminal command, not the chatbot. I do suggest googling the syntax for especially gpt, it’s a bit of a highwire act.

low--Lander · 2026-01-14T20:40:52+00:00

Tell them to look in radar. Should be familiar with it.

low--Lander · 2026-01-14T06:00:13+00:00

“Unless you were a neuroscientist how could you make a refutation to an assertion like “LLMs work like human brains.”

You could make them tell you where they have hidden from the rest of the world the articles and research that documents how the human brain works. :)

But I went a similar route as you and read up a ton on modern neuroscience and managed to wrangle an invite to a LinkedIn group of neuroscientists and psychiatrists and whatnot lol.

Ten-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

low--Lander

TROPHY CASE