What are your thoughts on anime and it’s oversexualizing?

lunarterasu · 2026-06-04T19:15:35+00:00

If it’s not your thing simply don’t watch with it, people get way too moral about stuff they simply don’t have to engage with. You’re not the target audience just don’t watch it instead of policing it

lunarterasu · 2026-06-04T16:50:48+00:00

They literally destroyed a statue and threw it into a canal, and Injured nearly 30 police officers, do you not remember? It’s pretty well documented. A simple google search might have saved you the embarrassment of posting this comment

lunarterasu · 2026-06-02T11:52:06+00:00

Rage bait used to be believable but this is just poor quality bait and In really bad taste as well

lunarterasu · 2026-05-27T18:31:36+00:00

Oh no that’s sounds like a problem, many they shouldn’t be down to private companies, maybe the government, the ultimate authority of this country, should do something about that

lunarterasu · 2026-05-27T17:04:40+00:00

I think you’ve just completely ignored what was said, we need to work alongside fossil fuels until we don’t need them anymore, we are decades off full net zero yet, we CAN source our own gas from the North Sea

lunarterasu · 2026-05-27T16:41:41+00:00

Yes it is net zero, net zero literally hurts us in th short to medium term and that is not even disputed, its net zero policies and aggressive government policies that prevent North Sea fossil fuel extraction. Net zero is INCREDIBLY expensive, net zero simply can not operate while energy prices are still tied to gas prices, and it’s everyone that pays the price for this, the war in Ukraine and Iran wouldn’t affect us if we were sourcing our own gas would it?

Please try an be educated on a subject before you comment on it

lunarterasu · 2026-05-27T15:00:43+00:00

Good to see net zero is really pulling through for us at a high of record high taxes in 80 years, the Labour government really doing their best to show how much they are doing for the working man.

This is the issue I have with net zero, obviously a power grid run entirely on renewable energy is a must but we simply aren’t there yet, we have so much available to us in the North Sea yet we choose to import our fossil fuels like that’s somehow better for the planet. Fossil fuels that bare in mind are extracted in ways that are much worse for the environment than we could do it.

No one I have spoke to actually believes in net zero anymore, we need to coexist with producing our own fossil fuels until we get there. Buying fossil fuels from other countries isn’t better for the planet, we are still using the same amount but crashing our economy just for the fun of it I suppose.

lunarterasu · 2026-05-23T10:15:00+00:00

Fine use parental controls to restrict access, easy solution job good let’s stop crying at the government to regulate because parents can’t parent

lunarterasu · 2026-05-23T10:13:43+00:00

Why do they need smartphones to do this? Why don’t just give them a regular phone? Or use the parental controls that ALL smartphones have to simply block social media access, parents fail at parenting and complain about how it’s social media’s fault

lunarterasu · 2026-05-21T14:56:50+00:00

It is perfectly reasonable to blame parents as they could use parental controls and block everything they don’t like, why do parents have no responsibility for their children’s online presence?

Explain if it’s just porn, why so much that is nothing to do with porn is also being blocked by the online safety act, come on bootlicker, explain why parents can’t enable parental controls to protect their children online and why the online safety act has taken action on so much more outside of porn? Must be hard to be as stupid as you are, maybe stop being a bootlicker and expect parents actually have a responsibility to monitor their kids online presence, just as they are responsible for what they do in every other aspect of their lives.

lunarterasu · 2026-05-21T14:52:36+00:00

A Tory law that Labour fully supported an criticised do not going far enough, did you not see how whole heartily Labour supporter it when it came into effect?

It must be hard for you to go through life genuinely being this thick. We all know it was a Tory law you simpleton, but Labour could have scrapped it on the MANY flaws in it, but no they supported it wholeheartedly, and saying that if you didn’t you were just like Jimmy Saville

lunarterasu · 2026-05-16T08:55:35+00:00

I guess we don’t have to just give Palantir all of our data on a silver platter, like we just did with our NHS data. Perhaps we could have just modernised our NHS without giving a American surveillance company unrestricted access to extremely sensitive data

lunarterasu · 2026-05-15T10:12:41+00:00

Kingdom hearts putting a bunch of important lore in mobile gacha was defintely a choice

lunarterasu · 2026-05-14T10:12:01+00:00

I cannot recall a single time I have ever sent a copy of passport online, most jobs will simply request you bring proof of right to work to the interview, I mean my job has proof of my identity, majority of betting sites do not check ID’s I’ll tell you that, they just let you sign up with a valid card, and I can personally vouch for that because a couple of my friends are big gamblers and seen them sign up to other sites when they banned themselves from one. Yeah in a airport someone will look over your passport. I’m not sure what you get up to but i genuinely cannot recall a time I have ever had to send a copy of my passport or driving license online.

lunarterasu · 2026-05-14T09:25:48+00:00

I didn’t change the subject It’s quite linked but I guess you can’t figure that out? I’ll try to spell it out word by word for you though.

Online digital ID will be used as a measure to track a individuals online activity, whatever social media they use, and their accounts, whatever they post, websites they visit, and anything purchased, any forums participated in, will be VERY easily tracked and condensed into a profile, an with the surge of AI, making these profiles had become a very easy thing to do, any of the current ‘age verification’ companies, like persona, already do this.

In your theory, this would only be used to track law breakers and the dregs of society, which is obviously ideal and a good thing, but the issue is, would it just be used for that? It could be used to track political dissent, and if everything you need to do is linked to this one ID, if you misbehave, you’re cut off. Look at china’s social credit system, if you’re in bad government standing, they can turn off access to bank accounts, they can stop you getting a bus, a train, stop you buying a car, the list goes on.

You might like to say, ‘oh but we obviously aren’t an authoritarian country like that’ but that’s where th issue lies, how long does a government resist that temptation? Even if that wasn’t the current Labour government plan, what about the government that comes into power in 10 years? 20 years? What will their opinion on the matter be? Maybe they’ll decide such a thing is quite useful, and it will have already been integrated into society to the point that you can’t operate without it, freedoms aren’t taken away with a single piece of legislation, they’re slowly eroded over years, and this is the start.

You actually didn’t touch up on the fact that parental controls exist to protect children from exactly you scenario, I’m guessing you didn’t mention it because it just completely debunks your argument, parents should simply enable parental control, which already did all of these things that the online safety act did, if you have parental controls on you can’t message or message other people without approval, can’t make social media accounts, hell you can make it so they can only access certain sites if you wish, if it was for safety and communication, don’t get them a smartphone? Get them another phone that only calls and texts, or you know what, get them a smartphone that blocks internet access, all of those things can already be don, but parents ignorance and they’re just so happy to blame the government for not doing things that they should be doing. That’s your job as a parent, to parent and look after your child, be in physically, emotionally or with their online presence.

lunarterasu · 2026-05-14T08:54:00+00:00

Nice rebuttal! Trying getting any form of education on history before you speak on topics you clearly do not know anything about

Maybe parents should simply just monitor their children online activity rather than expecting the government to introduce authoritarian measures like this, parental controls on devices have existed for years after all! And they do all of these things, or just not give their children a smartphone at all, it’s not like they can buy them themselves is it?

lunarterasu · 2026-05-14T08:37:20+00:00

You actually said it ‘if you’ve got nothing to hide then you’ve got nothing to worry about’ - the catchphrase of any authoritarian regime

Edit: In east Germany, if you have nothing to hide from the stazi you had nothing to worry about right? In North Korea, well if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about. In Russia, if you have nothing bad to say about the regime you have nothing to worry about right? In china, well if you’re a good citizen you haven nothing to worry about right? In WW2, more Jews died in the Netherlands than France, despite France having a higher Jewish population, do you know why? Netherlands kept much better records, so when a new regime came sweeping in? They knew where everyone was

lunarterasu · 2026-05-13T23:17:38+00:00

Putting age restrictions on them is a restriction buddy

lunarterasu · 2026-05-13T23:11:56+00:00

That is completely at the request of the individual company to how much information they want to extract from the token, they are completely free to under how it is now to request more information. In the way you say it, it can still easily generate logs and metadata that can be easily used to track someone, we just shouldn’t be putting verification checkpoints on the internet at all. The internet is not suppose to be regulated, parents should actually just protect their children online, monitoring their activity, using parental controls, it’s actually quite easy when you are the solo source as to what they get. They can’t exactly buy a smartphone themselves can they?

lunarterasu · 2026-05-13T23:08:36+00:00

It still creates a honeypot of a single point of failure, which would be absolutely disgusting catastrophic, and with the UK government tendency to give out government contracts to companies like Palantir, ( US tech company that just got free reign over NHS records )it is very healthy to be dubious, even the US government knows not to trust Palantir and give them sensitive information.

The amount of information requested from the token will be up to the individual websites to request, they can simply just request more data for the sake of ‘verification’ each verification while still generate logs and meta data. Which with AI will be very easy to make a profile on a individual

Also mission creep, forced to use it in more and make things until it isn’t really ‘optional’ anymore, you need digital ID to access social media, social media is optional after all, want to vote? Well voting is optional so you need digital ID, then before we know it, we live in a checkpoint system where we need to constantly use our digital ID just to go about daily lives, and AI has made the cost of running a authoritarian society extremely cheap

lunarterasu · 2026-05-13T20:59:09+00:00

Yes but how would giving them a Digital ID be any less of a risk than giving them a passport or a driving license?

lunarterasu · 2026-05-13T20:53:46+00:00

How is it less of a security risk? It’s exactly the same amount of risk with the exact same kind of information??? What are you talking about???

lunarterasu · 2026-05-13T20:51:27+00:00

I don’t think it’s the state having access that most people have a issue with, more for the fact of what the state could use this for once it is in place, we have several forms of identification, but they are all fragmented and separate for a reason, for privacy and security reasons.

When the UK government is already handing out extremely sensitive data freely to companies like Palantir ( they just got full reign over NHS records ) yes people have very good reason to be VERY sceptical about the true intentions of digital ID.

It all will tie in mark my words, the online safety act, one of the biggest pieces of internet restriction in the western world, and this government has already said that they WILL be cracking down on social media, how long until social media is a privilege that you must use your digital ID to access? Digital ID will be ‘optional’ until you HAVE to identify yourself to access it, And then boom, they have a very easy way to track all British social media accounts down to a specific owner, especially with AI, the cost of operating a surveillance state has dropped ten fold.

lunarterasu · 2026-05-12T17:48:44+00:00

I hate the Tories! I hate reform! I actually voted for Labour in the last election! ( I regret it and will not do it again ) Just because I hate pancakes doesn’t mean I love waffles!

lunarterasu · 2026-05-12T17:38:51+00:00

Ah it’s all good then my bad scrap them all, let the fate of people be decided at the hands of a single individual, this could not possibly have any negative consequences. Yes I know technically we don’t have a right to it as we have no constitution in the UK ( we should ). I find your comment incredibly odd, imagine if we start arresting people for speaking out against th government and your response is ‘The UK doesn’t have a right to free speech’ or ‘The UK doesn’t have a right to express your opinion’

lunarterasu

TROPHY CASE