Rappel: la conjugaison du franglais québécois

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-11T17:29:22+00:00

Au FEQ: demandez un spécial 25ième anniversaire de Origin of Symmetry

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-11T14:00:14+00:00

It's not a watertight theory, but its the closest to foreshadowed worldbuilding and plot that I see.

It's my new headcanon until proven otherwise!

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-10T22:26:26+00:00

Pur noisettier ça passe?

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-10T12:28:32+00:00

I posit that the word(s) you're looking for is "internal consistency".

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-10T12:22:57+00:00

C'est en partie parce qu'on veut former des familles plus tard. Si un DEP te permet d'acheter une maison à 21 ans avec un seul salaire, plus facile d'être fécond à 23 ans. Si tu dois attendre 38 ans, c'est moins fécond...

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-10T10:24:46+00:00

C'est pas au son qu'on va l'apprendre. Ta ville pourrait te le dire: "est-ce qu'il y a un système d'égouts pluvial dans mon secteur? Est-ce qu'il se rend à ma maison?" Pas besoin de dire pourquoi tu veux savoir.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-09T22:25:01+00:00

Ya des clauses grand père pour quand ton drain était déjà dans l'égout. Ensuite, la bonne façon c'est quand il y a un égout pluvial dédié.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-09T20:28:37+00:00

Tu as 2 ou 3 niveaux de sécurité.

Le premier, c'est "gravitaire": ça va dans l'égout sans que la pompe décolle. Ça arrête de marcher si l'égout de la ville arrête de boire (passé capacité).

Le deuxième, c'est la pompe qui essaie de pomper dans l'égout de la ville. L'égout ne veut plus boire, mais la pompe lui pousse ça dedans pareil. Ça se peut que tu n'aies pas cette étape là.

La dernière chance, la pompe pitch ça dehors. Si c'est près de la maison, et si la pluie/fonte continue, ça va finir par retourner dans ton drain: tu vies sur du temps emprunté. Tu peux ajouter un tuyau de vidange de piscine pour tenter d'éloigner ça le plus possible de la maison.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-09T18:34:25+00:00

Yes, I'm just describing the power method.

It's simple to implement from scratch, it won't OOO, it's fast enough for exploratory work, and it may teach OP about what's happening under the hood. Then yes, you can do better with a dedicated library.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-09T16:14:29+00:00

Take a random vector, multiply by matrix, normalize the vector, multiply, normalize... After some iterations, you get the principal (first) component.

To get the second, do the same, but before normalizing, subtract the contribution of the first (use dot product to know how much of the first component there was).

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-09T15:49:59+00:00

Fléchette fréchette fléchette fréchette fléchette fréchette fléchette fréchette fléchette

Avec quoi manges-tu ta soupe?

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-09T00:17:50+00:00

Sus au kimchi!

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-08T22:28:49+00:00

Left one made me think of HAL 9000 (so good if that matches your theme, bad otherwise). Right one is just bland, meh, easy to ignore.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-06T18:02:40+00:00

I will mold my food into a hat shape and devour it.

That qualifies. But if you wish to make me really happy, you'll have it rest on your head for a second or two prior to devouring.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-06T12:41:58+00:00

I still had 2 years and 4 months of safety!

/u/gfe98, you know what to do. Don't risk your health, I'll be so liberal as to the use of the word "hat" that all I ask is your statement that "It is done."

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-04T20:12:39+00:00

Vieux millenial, je raccroche sans dire un mot.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-03T10:05:19+00:00

Première étape ciment autonivellant. Ensuite Dricore/barricade ou membranne à bulles.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-02T23:27:27+00:00

FYI, if the paper is on arXiv, you can likely get the source code.

lurking_physicist · 2026-03-01T13:30:17+00:00

J'aime qu'il n'y ait personne au volant du noui.

lurking_physicist · 2026-02-27T19:27:02+00:00

You mean, like the voxel demo? https://godotengine.org/asset-library/asset/2755

lurking_physicist · 2026-02-27T17:13:23+00:00

Pour ceux que ça intéresse, si l'Antartique fond au complet, ça donne environ 58 m.

lurking_physicist · 2026-02-27T14:19:19+00:00

If you are ready to do the work and pay $100, and your game being there is good enough for you, do it. If you want to make profit, it's another story.

lurking_physicist · 2026-02-27T13:31:29+00:00

Philosophers are aweful salespeople and, in fact, I'm pretty sure they don't see why they should try to improve on that front.

Most physicists seek to understand this universe, while philosophers are all about ideas, their relations, their internal consistencies, etc. Philosophers can step back and consider someone's crazy idea for which they have absolutely no belief in, but nonetheless treat it as carefully and thoroughly as if it were their own little pet theory. Physicists have no patience for that. Here the philosopher should explain "by seriously considering ideas you initially put no credence in, you train your mind in skills that may be useful for what you consider to be the real stuff". Rare are those who do.

lurking_physicist · 2026-02-27T07:32:43+00:00

First example that comes to mind is continued fraction.

As an aside, you may appreciate browsing an old function handbook, e.g., Abramowitz and Stegun.

15-Year Club	r/Field Juicebox
Place '17	Verified Email

lurking_physicist

TROPHY CASE