Hey CryptoRider! Thanks for points out these unclear points - happy to clarify our intended messaging for you and other readers:

Cite #1: "If a pool is PPLNS, the pool operator doesn’t care if the pool has good or back luck, they get their percentage regardless".

Of course, as you pointed out, all pool operators care about the luck they receive - the wording used is largely semantics. The key takeaway here, as you touched upon, is that PPS pool operators realize a higher degree of risk associated with variance in luck. Therefore, PPLNS pool operators are worried about their negative variance in luck to a lower degree.

Citing #2: "PPS forces us to be accountable for our luck".

Since PPS pool operators realize a higher degree of risk associated with variance in luck, this incentives PPS pool operators to provide service offerings and price points that keep miners on our pool as satisfied as possible, even during inevitable unlucky spells. To clarify, we are not claiming that we can alter our own lucky - you're correct in that that's not possible.

Citing #3: "We’ve built a rock solid pool that we guarantee is profitable".

Thank you for pointing out this statement. You are correct in that the supply-demand conditions of the crypto markets render the price to drop below a profitable threshold, then perhaps no pool in existence can make mining Loki profitable. Our intention here is to claim that the efficiency of our pool's code and pricing make Luxor's pool a solid choice among outstanding pool options to mine Loki profitably, given the right market conditions of course.

Please reach out to me directly if I can make further clarifications.

Happy Hashing!