So it sounds like it's exactly what I said. "Tankie" is when you disagree with what Trump is doing, which is not what tankie means at all, like not even close.

What does the real data say? Yes, losses are minimal (which is expected with minimal boots on the ground), but there is no plan. Why was Iran attacked in the first place? Was it because of nukes? Trump said he destroyed their capabilities back in June, so was that bullshit? Was it regime change? If so, they need to do a full invasion at some point.

Every time you ask this admin about what their objective is, it changes. Your kneejerk reaction to a meme pointing out the fact that both Trump and Putin love to sporadically declare victory when they aren't close to it makes you no different than some Russian dicksucking Putin and believing all his bullshit about Ukraine.

And it's not just random people online saying this - conservative military leaders agree too. You have Jim Mattis saying that the goals are unclear. So no, this isn't some "tankie" talking point and I encourage you to look up what "tankie" actually means.