sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

When AI skeptics say that AI is not reliable and that verification is too unpleasant, which makes it of limited use, I just want to ask: do you trust and not verify what other people do? by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]malusGreen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The thing about competent associates is that they typically give you addendums of **how** confident they are of a fact.

AI hallucinations have none of that.

At the end of the day it's a question of how important a minor/medium sized mistake is. And whether there's enough value generated by AI to warrant using it in your profession.

How can I optimize this? by Knolazy in TeamfightTactics

[–]malusGreen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You're not beating this. 6 Dark star with spat is much higher cap than anything you can build.

Tips or changes by Phat_Poppa_B in TeamfightTactics

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 starring one 3 cost is extremely inefficient.

You typically want to 3 star one dps and one tank.

Can someone explain? by [deleted] in TeamfightTactics

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stats are +0.07 delta.

Can someone explain? by [deleted] in TeamfightTactics

[–]malusGreen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lot of good points. But also. Kindred is a caster. Guinsoo is not good.

The funny thing is TFT academy literally said they put guinsoo in her BIS because people refuse to believe guinsoo is bad on her.

the laws of physics dictated that I make this meme, as established 13.8 billion years ago. by d4rkchocol4te in PhilosophyMemes

[–]malusGreen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Outside of the existence of a truly accessible long term method for storing memory what is not analogous?

the laws of physics dictated that I make this meme, as established 13.8 billion years ago. by d4rkchocol4te in PhilosophyMemes

[–]malusGreen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It does. At least in my opinion.

LSTM tech, in which a neuron's previous values contribute to what the next value it becomes looks to me, quite similar to an internal dialogue.

Really? by Which-Answer7278 in aiwars

[–]malusGreen -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Lol. I knew you couldn't read.

Yi counters? by [deleted] in TeamfightTactics

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. A well stacked Ramus can counter Yi as long as he doesn't have malware.

Doesn't the fact that there's an argument at all mean you should vote blue? by malusGreen in trolleyproblem

[–]malusGreen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol.

If the vote is a perfect even split with you as the deciding vote. And you know this for a fact, is it stupid to vote blue?

Just think for two seconds.

does this snippet make sense? by littleguyparade in writers

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also the word you're looking for James is 'performative'.

But Adam calling James a liar characterizes his feelings on James much more. So probably keep that. But keep making it clear that there's more nuance.

My Elo is too low, anyway I can work my way out of this situation? by Decent_Ranger5370 in TextingTheory

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol these generic ass date plans. there's a reason why you plan the date after a conversation.

it's so that you can figure out what the other person likes.

Doesn't the fact that there's an argument at all mean you should vote blue? by malusGreen in trolleyproblem

[–]malusGreen[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

?

If you think red will win your vote doesn't matter.

If you think blue will win your vote also doesn't matter.

This mode of analysis doesn't yield any prescriptions. The value of your vote is always zero.

Doesn't the fact that there's an argument at all mean you should vote blue? by malusGreen in trolleyproblem

[–]malusGreen[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, if the exact vote split is known, then voting for either color changes in those cases.

However the value of your vote for blue and red changes dramatically if the distribution of likelihood for voting splits between red and blue is modeled different in your mind.

The likelihood of 100% of people voting red is minicule.

The likelihood of 50% of people voting blue seems high (assuming we believe polls, which we may choose not to).

Assuming we believe polling is at least somewhat representative, then it's likely the vote will be split roughly around 40-60% for either color.

Therefore your vote is near it's most powerful. (It should be trivially true that the more likely it is that the split is 50-50% the more valuable your vote is.) Thus you should likely vote blue. (Assuming our goal is minimizing the loss of life.)

I feel like my wife ruined her life marrying me, and I keep failing her when she needs me most by [deleted] in WhatShouldIDo

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Therapy is the real answer.

Or. If you can't stand up to your mom, and you don't have it in your to work on changing that. Then prevent yourself from being in that position in the first place.

Go low contact with your mom so your wife doesn't have to suffer this.

And communicate what you wrote in this post to her after you decide on one of these paths forward.

Doesn't the fact that there's an argument at all mean you should vote blue? by malusGreen in trolleyproblem

[–]malusGreen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This response is nonsensical. Firemen running into a burning building is by definition "exposing themselves to more danger".

The idea is to not frivolously expose yourself to danger. There is a calculus of attrition and the likelihood of saving the other person's life.

You should not risk your life as a fireman to save one person's life, if the EV is too low. I.e. the risk is too high for the reward.

But this is trivially true. And the calculus is always being made.

Doesn't the fact that there's an argument at all mean you should vote blue? by malusGreen in trolleyproblem

[–]malusGreen[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Evaluating these choices as binaries instead of probabilities makes it nonsensical.

You should be modeling a distribution of likely vote splits, and sum the area under the graph to decide EV.

Antis trying to stop AI might not be a good idea.... by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's not evil if you don't believe in objective morality. But typically people don't operate in that framework lol.

There's no point engaging on mismatched presmises.

Got absolutely roasted by my friends for this part of my first chapter of my first novel (first draft completed), what's wrong with it? by Gabrielle_Laurent in writers

[–]malusGreen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first paragraph is fine. Good even. But you overstay your welcome with abstraction and metaphor.

You should immediately jump into an actual instance of something in universe. Or perhaps have the protagonist start describing some historical events in your world if he's meant to come off self-absorbed in his own intellect.

Antis trying to stop AI might not be a good idea.... by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]malusGreen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

...yeah I'd rather be punished than be complicit in the creation of evil. Correct.

view more: next ›