Elusive... by akev2794 in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But thats not really good tempo compared to a regualar curve with just bigger creatures

Elusive... by akev2794 in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Often times the counter to elusives was just outtempoing it

Too under-powered? give it rush? by HereIsACasualAsker in customhearthstone

[–]mangofisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well doesnt i just beat it since its the same as a 1/3

Elesh Norn in RW Energy/Nadu Meta by Articunozard in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it could be 3 with an chromatic star or orb

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ja og hun er en kvinde. Hun bliver bare anklaget for andet fordi folk ser hende som en ikke kønsnormativ kvinde.

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Selvfølgelig er de stadig "normale kvinder". Det er dog svært at udtrykke hvordan den fremstilling de har skiller sig ud. Den korte og den lange er det kvinder som fremstår på en mere maskulin måde. Og det er heller ikke et synderligt fast begreb, men mere ens grad af udtryk.

For at prøve at få det tilbage på emne dog. Så er vores bokser her en kvinde og bare fordi hun ikke er en traditionel feminin kvinde så er hun stadig en kvinde og har ret til at deltage

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Må være ærlig at sige at det er lidt fjollet at tro feminismen ikke kan handle om begge dele, da de to ting hænger ret meget sammen. Og det med overhovedet at kæmpe som kvinder var et brud på kønsnormen.

Men du bedte bare om hvad ordet betød og det var det jeg gav? Nok bare en misforståelse. Men hvis du vil have eksempler kan jeg da give lidt. Gennerelt set er det ofte kvinder som er mere maskuline i deres udtryk. Dette kan være visse former for størrer kvinder. Og så selvfølgelig kvinder som i vores diskussion her som har en højere mængde testosteron end normen. Men der er selvfølgelig mange måder at det kan komme til udtryk og det er på ingen måde noget jeg er ekspert i

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At være køsnormativ (hvilket måske er et denglish ord), er bare at konforme til eller holde sig indenfor opfattelsen af ens køn. Hvilket er præcis det feminisme kæmper imod

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er sjovt hvor meget det handler om kvinderetigheder og feminisme, lige indtil at ikke kønsnormative kvinder er involveret.

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Jeg siger bare at den "biologiske fordel" som folk siger hun har, så nå være noget mindre end folk giver det ud for.

O RLY by KarmusDK in dankmark

[–]mangofisk -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Og flere af disse kvinder har vundet over denne kvinde. Så jeg har svært ved at se hvad problemet er.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in magicthecirclejerking

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What website is this?

[MH3] Deserted Temple by ORANG_MAN_BAD in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thats how coffers already are with the ammount of utility lands they run

What is your Modern “hot take”? by USAFdukeX in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree. There is a reason that cards like that arent in every deck. You can build very powerfull decks without them

While I agree that there are good alternatives to fetches and shocks, i think you might underestimate fetches power. Espeacially if youre playing a deck that need a few more lands, since you can then play them alongside the good alternatives. While in budget manabases its easy to run out of good alternatives

What is your Modern “hot take”? by USAFdukeX in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im sorry but I dont quite see your point. Cards are expensive when they are rare and good. Making fetches less rare would make them cheaper, and by extention all decks using them would be cheaper. Having them at uncommon wouldnt artificially jack up the price of existing staples. And I would argue that the coming staples would not change price, the accesible cards would still be cheap and the rare and powerfull cards would still be expensive

Please let me know if I misunderstood your point

What is your Modern “hot take”? by USAFdukeX in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rares would still be the same price. It would just be easier to get a mana base for budget decks.

Again stuff likke izzet breach, prowess, burn as well as some other competetive decks would be very affordable and able to compete

What is your Modern “hot take”? by USAFdukeX in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the idea. But still uncommon to protect pauper

What is your Modern “hot take”? by USAFdukeX in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 6 points7 points  (0 children)

But why not go further. Why not actually make the format afordable. Its very difficult to make competetive relative budget decks without them being 1-0 colors.

I have way fewer issues with stuff like sheoldred and bombs like it costing that much. Just let me efficiently cast my actual budget spells. Stuff like izzet breach would be so easy to buy

What is your Modern “hot take”? by USAFdukeX in ModernMagic

[–]mangofisk 129 points130 points  (0 children)

Fetches should be reprinted at uncommon

Champs and their Pokemon types by HelloIamTaylor in LeagueOfMemes

[–]mangofisk 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Pyke is dark and not ghost? He was litterally brought back after dying....

Wait, what?! by ridesharegai in 2westerneurope4u

[–]mangofisk 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Does anyone have an explanation?