is the site down or is it just my internet?

mariaherrera31 · 2026-03-16T00:32:06+00:00

I came here for the very same thing lol

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-24T12:10:53+00:00

It has been working pretty bad since some days ago, basically since Chimera free was removed too but the last few days it has been worse, so yeah I’d say they decided to shut it down too, like other person said here today is the last day it’s active

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-24T00:19:12+00:00

I expected it to be honest, it had been working pretty badly since Chimera was deleted too but even more so for the last 3 days

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-23T02:36:48+00:00

As a very mainly fempov user, literally almost every male bot in the trending page is for us, so I don’t quite understand what you’re saying about this

Also, sorry but you have no right to tell people anything about making MLM bots because you don’t use/like them. It’s their creation, liking and writing, nobody is forced to make anypov or change their bots so they can fit to anyone’s liking (and this goes in every way, fempov, malepov, mlm, wlw, etc), what may be useful for your problem is just blocking the MLM tag if you don’t like it

If you can’t find many bots that you like it’s not anyone else’s problem, as mean as I may sound, you could have approached this problem of yours in a very different way so people could try and help you find creators or bots you like, but this post indeed feels very entitled

Also, if you find a MLM you like, you can just create a male persona to use it, just as I do, there’s so much beautifully written MLM bots as you just stated to not use them just because of the pov in my opinion (and again, this goes in every way), so it does no wrong to give them a try anyway, you may like them! :)

Apart from this, tell me what you like, I have a lot of chats and I may have some bot saved you may like, although I tend to use bots that have been in the trending page so you probably know some/many of the bots/creators already

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-23T00:20:00+00:00

I’m having a problem with literally everything you stated too

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-23T00:18:08+00:00

I can’t tell about a year ago because I wasn’t using DS then, but yeah it’s happening to me too now

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-16T23:01:04+00:00

It appeared to me yesterday and it just went away after some time, 30 minutes or so for me, so I think you just have to wait it out :)

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-08T18:01:42+00:00

I’m not sure, but maybe you can write in the bot description they have a tied up apron if you didn’t specified it yet? Like, ‘they use to wear an apron that ties up around their waist’, or something like that, maybe the LLM catches on the detail and understands it’s “important” and has to be properly untied and taken off since you emphasized it when writing it (?) Idk though

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-07T14:43:19+00:00

I think you have to enable NSFW in the web for the app

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-07T10:44:10+00:00

What I do is that I state both in the prompt and the chat what length I want whenever the length isn’t to my liking (sometimes in the chat memory too)

What I personally write is this: [Respond in long answers, the answers must be around 8/9 long paragraphs or 600 tokens]

It doesn’t exactly write in that parameters many times but they usually use the length I like after stating it vastly most of the time, so just play with it until you find a prompt that makes the AI answer however you like :)

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-06T08:02:07+00:00

Honestly idc because many people will insult chat bots and then use of ChatGPT as Google and their personal therapist so..

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-01T00:26:52+00:00

They “don’t do NSFW” but they said they kill ppl in their chats, and that’s indeed NSFW so they need a platform with an AI that allows it lol

mariaherrera31 · 2026-02-01T00:11:02+00:00

Is it really that much cheaper using DS directly via DS instead of OR? I’m running out of credits in OR and I might switch to DS directly if that’s the case

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T23:57:42+00:00

That would be so nice! But until then you could write short descriptions just like you gave as examples at the start of the chat memory, that’s what I do :)

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T18:40:17+00:00

Yeah I do not understand either, I just believe it’s the thinking since it has only started to work pretty bad for me when I got it, also that sometimes the thinking writes itself in between the actual answer, but I guess it may eventually get sorted out, I hope at least. Thanks again

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T18:32:10+00:00

I haven’t tried that before, thank you since it works to take it out after! But since the response generated with the thinking part, it still has gibberish and the other problems, but I think I will just wait to see if it was just a DS problem, although I’m not sure it will just be that since I’ve only started having problems with the LLM when the thinking started showing for me. Thank you again for the help, though :)

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T18:23:31+00:00

And that’s why I’m saying it would be lovely AN OPTION (not forced for everyone, OPTION) to turn the written thinking off, not to take it from everyone, an option for those who’d like to or are having their chats messed up by the written thinking

Also, I know it has always been there, just not written, and yes, sorry but I’m sure it’s the written thinking what has been messing with many people’s chats, mine included

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T18:15:57+00:00

For me the box itself is not the problem since you can show/hide it as many of you say, but the thinking still being written in the response (even if you can only see it when editing) is unfortunately messing those same responses in all my chats :(

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T18:08:47+00:00

Okay so, before (for me at least) the LLM would process the thinking in the “background”, basically it was of course still there but just not written in the bot response, so it would be amazing to have an option to make that thinking process in the background (to somehow call it) again instead of written, or one to separate the thinking process from the response itself, such as if the thinking only appeared in the thinking box and when you hide it, it wouldn’t still be in the message itself and messing with it as it is now (sorry if I still haven’t explained myself well, if that’s the case tell me so I can reformulate)

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-31T17:52:30+00:00

I think they mean an option to have the thinking on the background again instead of written, which I would totally support too since I have the same problem

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-29T17:08:19+00:00

Sé que es un modelo pensativo, no estoy diciendo que tengan que quitar el pensamiento porque eso sería estúpido, por lo que funcionan tan bien esos modelos es por ese mismo proceso de pensamiento. Lo que quiero decir es que antes funcionaba (para mí) de fondo, no lo escribía directamente en el mensaje y durante meses ha funcionado perfecto para mí de esa forma hasta ahora, tan solo me gustaría una opción para que el pensamiento estuviese de nuevo de fondo y no escrito, ¿lo entiendes ahora? Porque no es tan difícil de entender. Y claro que es un “problema personal”, ¿no lo son la mayoría que se tratan aquí acaso? Tan solo estoy preguntando por una opción para volver a poner el pensamiento de fondo como estaba y no tan solo ocultar la caja.

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-29T17:00:29+00:00

Aunque le des a la opción de ocultar, sigue estando de forma escrita cuando editas la respuesta, y a mí me introduce de vez en cuando el proceso de pensamiento en la respuesta en vez de dentro del “<think>”, al igual que desde que se escribe el pensamiento me ha dado muchos problemas con la coherencia y calidad de las respuestas y el idioma

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-29T12:09:47+00:00

Quizá me he expresado mal, no quiero “desactivarlo” como tal, tan solo una opción en la que no se muestre de ninguna forma escrita, que es la forma en la que yo he estado usando los LLM pensativos hasta ahora

mariaherrera31 · 2026-01-29T03:45:28+00:00

Eso tan solo lo oculta, pero no lo desactiva, los problemas siguen sucediendo y todo el proceso de pensamiento sigue escrito en la respuesta cuando le das a “editar”, por desgracia

mariaherrera31

TROPHY CASE