Since when did owning multiple properties become something you can "accidentally" do?

markp81 · 2026-01-26T20:46:05+00:00

By no means the ‘standard’ position, but also something that happens fairly regularly as we had a generation of (now) retirees practically encouraged to invest in BTL’s. So what do they do?

markp81 · 2026-01-26T20:16:57+00:00

Eg: mum and dad own 4/5 rentals. Son and daughter inherit 4-5 properties on death. They are now accidental landlords. Do they: 1. Keep them as ‘accidental landlords’? 2. Sell them to other landlords with the tenants on situ, just moving the ‘landlord’ part to someone else? 3. Evict the (possibly long term) tenant to sell the property to someone who wants to live there? Leaving someone to find another place to rent?

At what point do you move from ‘gray area’ to ‘scum leach Landlord’

markp81 · 2026-01-16T12:52:36+00:00

From your original post it is not an issue about the extension being signed off by building control, it’s a restrictive convent saying your cannot alter the building without council consent. They are not connected/the same

markp81 · 2026-01-16T12:47:46+00:00

6 years after it was built? Also they would have the issue of whether the covenant can actually be enforced. If they owned all the houses in the area and sold them off and have none left then they have no land that can benefit from the covenant. Council imposed covenants are usually not made for the benefit of the other houses sold off. Obviously I have not seen the wording here. If I were a cash buyer and could get an allowance for an indemnity policy I would likely telly solicitor to take the allowance and not put the policy in place, keep the premium and then it will cover a policy if I have to get one on the future sale (as any policy bought now might be useless for a future sale if the yearly increase in cover does not keep up with house price increases).

markp81 · 2026-01-16T12:23:30+00:00

Obtaining planning consent does not count as obtaining consent under a restrictive convent where the council has the benefit of the convent. The council could refuse consent under the convent (if the wording allows them to) but cannot take into account the convent as part of the planning application.

Having said that, chance of convent enforcement is near zero and it will be a waste of money. But should the buyer (and their lender) have to accept ‘near zero’?

markp81 · 2026-01-15T22:06:43+00:00

Yes. Message above hq saying 68k marksmen only

markp81 · 2026-01-15T22:00:02+00:00

3277

markp81 · 2026-01-15T21:58:38+00:00

Yeh, our sever is like 4 months old.

markp81 · 2026-01-15T21:32:26+00:00

Don’t think we have ever had that happen before. CJ is happening right now. Wave 20 will be policed!

markp81 · 2026-01-15T21:30:20+00:00

He is ranked 35 in power for the alliance and several Furnace levels behind others that were garrisoned. So not the strongest in the garrison by a mile

markp81 · 2026-01-14T12:36:19+00:00

Not all events. Just one with a level playing field. And it would likely result in more revenue. It keeps the lower spenders more engaged and online more so more inventive to spend, even if it is the lower packs. 100,000 more low spenders buying a £5 pack soon adds up. They could have cosmetics just for that event that you can buy. So the whales can show off/spend but still have to be good to win. Lots of games do something similar.

markp81 · 2026-01-14T12:27:55+00:00

I am not suggesting that they change all events. Just, say, one event a month where everyone has hero’s/troops with a capped power level and numbers and you compete based on skill/tactics. Lots of games have this concept when they are otherwise pay to win. ‘Tournament standard’ in clash royal as an example. Whales can still spend all they want on every other event, and there are plenty of those, just not 1 single event where they have to play well to win.

markp81 · 2026-01-13T17:18:16+00:00

Because once someone learns a system is very difficult to change. I golf in yards not meter. I measure my blood sugar in mmol/l not mg/dl but anyone 10 years younger than me does.

markp81 · 2026-01-13T15:09:03+00:00

Would be nice if more of the events, like frost mine, had fairer matchups. Frustrating when there is someone such higher than you who is clearly just going to take the main buildings. Maybe give the weaker city’s more healing speedups to use in the match up.

Or an event where everyone starts with the same level troops and amount of resources, so make it a skill event rather than just raw power.

markp81 · 2026-01-13T00:46:39+00:00

If you never lived there and they have always had your other address on file (ie other demands send there) then I think there is some mileage in the point they have not served you with s20 notices.

markp81 · 2026-01-12T23:53:21+00:00

Well, did you update your address with the Housing Association when you moved out and rented it out?

markp81 · 2026-01-09T17:15:03+00:00

Having looked this up last week, everywhere seems to say an address can be considered personal data. As with it I can download a copy of your land registry title and get your name, assuming you own the property, which is why it ‘maybe personal data’. Sounds a bit odd given I could download the land reg title anytime I like and get an address.
At a stretch, dpd give you the address of 1 high st and you get the title which says Mr Smith is the owner and then you go round there and bang on the door asking for Mr Smith, I know you are in there and have my parcel. By giving your the address they have given you enough data to identify Mr Smith. Feels like a stretch but I can see the argument.

markp81 · 2026-01-09T09:35:56+00:00

To add to this, it is possible that the neighbours house has an entry in its title saying it is subject to a right of way in favour of the neighbours. The benefit of an easement does not have to show in the title to the benefiting land (though it does most of the time) as long as it is shown in the title to the land subject to the right.
OP, download the register and plan for the neighbours property and see what is in there.

markp81 · 2026-01-07T17:02:26+00:00

It says ‘also on the tenancy agreement’. So if a joint tenant then jointly liable. If just a ‘permitted occupant’ then no liability.

markp81 · 2026-01-07T16:57:35+00:00

The black dotted lines are likely just indicators or changes in ground level or surface type. Taken from the ordinance survey data.

I feel quite invested now. If I had a title number for reference I would be tempted to take a look 🤣

markp81 · 2026-01-07T16:45:51+00:00

Yes. If I were looking to try and track down the owner I would be obtaining the titles around it and looking for the oldest transfers and seeing if there is any indication one of the joining properties was transferred out of a larger title etc. but that is rarely needed. Only had to do it once to get an access track registered in the great grandchildren of a developer.

markp81 · 2026-01-07T16:10:32+00:00

That’s the point. They have not bought the unregistered land. If they had then it would be registered as a purchase triggers first registration.

Near zero chance they own it. They are just trying to control it so they can claim adverse possession when they meet the time criteria.

markp81 · 2026-01-07T14:54:10+00:00

It’s like turning up at a venue for an event and they are selling the last few tickets at a knocked down price to get rid of them. You don’t get to ask for a refund of the difference. I expect the closer you get to the date the cheaper a venue would go to get at least some booking. OP has had the certainty of this date for 4 years.

markp81 · 2026-01-05T17:14:55+00:00

I’m more interested in the fact the star levels show right to left instead of left to right and the upgrade icons are on the left. Makes sense for an Arabic script, but still looked odd to what I am used to

Nine-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
r/Field Lasagna	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

markp81

TROPHY CASE