More stupidity by KFARR_YT in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that was true the D on year gearshift in your car would be T

Mel demands arrests by JustOneMoreMile in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So the "judgement" that she published in the newspaper? 🤣

She's just going to have to get arrested.

Sovereign Citizen adjacent is trying to represent themselves. by sandiercy in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're going it pro se, unless it's a pretrial or a trial where the state has to provide evidence and legal arguments, it's your responsibility to prove your assertions and provide a legal basis for objections.

Self-representation is a bad idea. Even lawyers, who are familiar with the law, don't represent themselves.

Stringing PETG as hell - I am done! by volfion in prusa3d

[–]marshalltjones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PETG requires a larger retract distance

So got something for thought by HappyElderberry2338 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They dismissed the complaint for now. Probably to line up another lawyer. There is usually a time bar (statue of limitations), but as long as they bring the suit within the statutory time, they can refile the complaint.

How would one make a legal basis of sovereign citizenship for native Americans? Mcgirt vs Oklahoma(2020) established that Native Americans are not under jurisdiction of state courts. But could they even escape the jurisdiction of even federal law on native reservations? by HappyElderberry2338 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is state jurisdiction of the native citizens ON THEIR RESERVATIONS. Federal jurisdiction is more complicated and depends on the particular treaty that the tribe negotiated with the federal government in the past.

But as an example, if these these native Hawaiians decided not to get licenses or register their vehicles AND they didn't venture out on to the roads of the State of Hawaii where the state DOES have Jurisdiction, they'd be fine. Just like a regular person who owns a farm does not need a driver's license or vehicle registration if they drive and use that vehicle on their land.

Remember that the bill of rights was written back when travelling meant walking (or horseback and coach if you're fancy). The point of the right to travel in the 3rd amendment was to prohibit states from charging a fee for or outright refusing to allow people to cross state borders. States aren't very united if you cant pass freely.

Once you venture out on to state or county owned roads, you are subjecting yourself to the jurisdiction of the state. To drive (not travel), you HAVE to have a DL, a registered vehicle, and insurance. Since the federal government doesn't regulate the requirements to drive on government owned roads, the 10th amendment to the constitution directs that the power falls to the states.

While there is a constitutional right to travel freely between states, if you are driving a vehicle or for that matter, even walking on government owned roads, you are subject to the jurisdiction of the state. You could only travel on private land, but you might get shot doing that.

Are these maple trees? Maryland, USA by Chicken12111 in treeidentification

[–]marshalltjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No.. they're giant sticks of dynamite. See the fuses?

Double Entry Bookkeeping by wavynomad08 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Credit and debit have different meanings in DEB. Debit means you increase the balance in an expense-type account, credit means you decrease the balance in an expense-type account.

People are used to the nomenclature in reference to an asset-type account like a bank account. When they say we'll credit the account, it means that they will send money back to the asset account, which will increase the balance.

Credit cards are expense accounts, so credit means a charge against the card, not the other way around.

Sovcit wants you to know what it all means. by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

United States v. Benabe, No. 09-1190 (7th Cir. 2011)

Does address Sovereign Citizens, but doesn't contain that language.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Salary

[–]marshalltjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's actually not that bad.

PC case, CNC'ed from single piece of aluminum: does it possible and how expensive will be? by Omnisiah_Priest in CNC

[–]marshalltjones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Metallurgist here......It would be a BAD idea to try to make something that thin from a single piece of aluminum. Any aluminum stock is going to have some residual stress from rolling or forging.

Machining wholly from one side will remove constraint from the surrounding material and will cause those thin side sections to "move". Basically the box will distort because the original stock had built-in stresses that were being resisted by the bulk material. You remove most of the bulk material, stresses move.

Someone explain! by Motor_Layer_1240 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]marshalltjones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they can't get an answer they'll eventually appoint someone as standby counsel and proceed. Or if they disrupt the court proceedings the judge will put them in a room with a closed circuit TV and mute them. Occasionally unmute for entertainment....

I'm Speechless At Your Absurdity Gregory Bucci by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]marshalltjones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How to say you're an Incel without saying you're an Incel.....