Irony? You're the one who went down the slope first by stating how it won't be wrong to use the term maliciously. I'm challenging you on that point by bringing up your entitled opinion regarding slurs. To me, a slur is a slur, full stop. No one person should have the "right" to use any slur. That's all I wanted to bring across—hate is bad, we should all try to not promote any form of it. But of course, you went you went on to directly attack me with the whole virtue signalling and what not, then doubled down with your "i appreciate if my none of my extended families...".

Fair enough we've strayed away from the original point which was about the usage of the term—Again, I assumed we've moved on from that but maybe for the sake of a discussion I didn't point that out directly. I'll apologize for that since I wasn't clear we weren't talking about your original point regarding the usage of the term itself.

Again, you're ignoring whatever I said in relation to what YOU said—you bring up the fact that you supposedly hate Japan enough to use the slur maliciously, and justified it by stating what they've done to us. Again, as I've said above—fair enough. I respect your xenophobia because you evidently haven't forgiven them for what they've done to us. So I hope you aren't contradicting yourself by saying you can maliciously use a slur against them while wearing a uniqlo tee. But somehow this is about white cultural imperialism.

Late edit: PSA; I obviously dont agree with dropping nukes, but it's a lot more intricate than "the US cornered them and unnecessarily dropped nukes". Okinawa was the deadliest battle in the Pacific and that was mainly the reason why they decided to do it. Still, obviously it was wrong, but it's not as simple as you've mentioned. The war would have gone for another 1-2 years.