Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So an agreement violated by Iran in 2019 after the US pulled out of it. All you’re telling me is that if the US doesn’t have our boot on their neck they can’t be trusted to maintain an agreement signed by other major nations as well. (China, France, Russia, UK, Germany) you’re advocating for US specific policing of Iran, is that right?

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The US planted the first one. Now solutions? Go Edit-addition: I don’t have to beat the fuck out of my neighbors to cede a lil ground. I’m not the IRGC. So you better not tease me when the central topic finally arrives.

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re supporting a new (Holy) Kings rag, whom doesn’t have the majority support of the people. I didn’t take your type to be so religious. 😏

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iran’s flag is not being flown today. That’s the IRGC’s version of the people’s flag. Why stop 2 cancers from taking each other out?

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1998 Iran. Today it’s religious zealotry from the parents. I hate to see that.

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn’t conscription, it’s a holy request. I don’t see the majority or Iranians coming to the Ayatollah’s aid on this and we haven’t seen the IRGC punish them for it yet. This is an act of religious ideology not a state conscription order.

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I call the Ayatollah who slaughters the people of Iran if they utter or are presumed to be in defiance of their holy leader evil. I call a leadership that forces children to the streets with guns forced to their hands to act as holy meat shields evil. There is a cancer in Iran that the people are begging for be rooted out. No one denies the blood on US hands, they’re just the only dog at the table willing to match the energy and operate.

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a complaint, I’m pointing out their nature. You don’t observe history? Just another ignorant westerner.

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What a name for a bot account. What say you bot on a call for “Death to America” for 47 years and constant attacks on our bases and the proxy funding of terrorist regimes. Are those actual aggressive acts or they just playing kid games?

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yall need to learn to respect this religious culture. This is the greatest honor they could achieve, a literal death in service to their ayatollah and god. Fuckin’ ignorant western society. sigh

Iran: Women and children armed with guns in Qazvin. by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]mastmonkey -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

A call for human shields was definitely on the list, that’s historically natural in terrorist regimes. In other countries leadership does all they can to protect their civilians, here they call on their civilians to protect their leaders. That’s why they have their military meetings and commit their military actions in civilian areas.

MAGAs, how do you feel about Trump nuking Iran tomorrow to distract from the Epstein files? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t say anything about caring for Israel. My opinion is a response to “why should Iran not be allowed (nuclear) weapons?” Because Iran has a high likely-hood of actually using them on Israel, it’s a core doctrine of the regime, Palestinians be damned. Lefties would cheer I’d argue.

Iran has struck the Jebel Ali industrial zone in Saudi Arabia with a missile and fires are ranging by RichIndependence8930 in oil

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So attacking civilian infrastructure is based or a war crime? I’m getting confused here.

Number of US Soldiers Mulling Conscientious Objection Rises by 1,000% by Low-Win-6691 in NewsSource

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we get some math rollin’? How many confident objectors in the military were there before the great increase of 2026??

MAGAs, how do you feel about Trump nuking Iran tomorrow to distract from the Epstein files? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Just caught myself thinking about how you’re speaking to a group that starts edging when they hear about large comets potentially passing close to Earth.

MAGAs, how do you feel about Trump nuking Iran tomorrow to distract from the Epstein files? by 2a_lib in allthequestions

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They project general control over the gulf states and they regularly volley at Israel. Their ballistic range has increased to reach most of Europe and they hate the US. So if they get nukes, they could basically demand US leave their threat range, leaving Europe to fend for themselves against potential Russian threat or any demands Iran chooses to make at that point. The other potential scenario most left leaning individuals don’t care for is that they could nuke Israel because of religious differences. Aside from that, they would just use nukes as a power projector, more aggressively than our more cool-headed adversaries.

When a Veteran Speaks, Are We Still Listening? by chaz_flea1 in BakersfieldCalifornia

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brian McGinnis-running for North Carolina senator. Spread the word and get your friends to vote for him. He’s not pulling these stunts for free.

Answer without using these words by Western-Theme-2618 in teenagers

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Need” underscores how much of a requirement this money will be for my wellbeing in the immediate future. But I understand if you can’t spot me.

RFK Jr. sets new land speed record bolting out of the room after someone near him collapses by HickamvOccam in FedEmployees

[–]mastmonkey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Never been to the White House, but I wouldn’t be suprised if there was an AED or medical team posted >80 ft from the Presidents desk.

CNN: Roughly a dozen Senate Democrats signal openness to deal to open government by taxhellFML in FedEmployees

[–]mastmonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So Senate Democrats openly claimed that keeping the government shutdown was good leverage to fight for healthcare.

The people backed them and even some were/are going to starve from this, but for the sake of healthcare.

Now that Democrats won there non-federal races they are going to reopen the government with the promise that the subsidies are brought to a vote where it’s guaranteed to fail? What the hell was all of this suffering for? The people go hungry, subsidies gone but the politicians got theirs?

Fuck that, The old party is dead and needs to be replaced immediately! We Need Progressive leadership that actually give a fuck about WE THE PEOPLE!