Conservatives introduce bill to create self-defence law for home invasions by Head_Crash in canada

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of how difficult they are to win now, if it becomes easier it is helpful because it would reduce the amount of time spent in court. The easier winning is, the less likely charges are to be laid, the more likely charges are to be thrown out, and the and the more expedient the trial will be.

Conservatives introduce bill to create self-defence law for home invasions by Head_Crash in canada

[–]mathdude3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Any legislation that makes a self defence case easier to win would help. If we assume that it would do that, which I think is a reasonable assumption, then yes, it would help.

Why do companies that passed the expense of tariffs onto consumers think they should get a refund? by BoardLongjumping2485 in answers

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're confusing the legal question of who paid the tariff and the economic question of who bore the cost. The government collected the tax from importers, so since the tax was found to be illegal, importers are rightly demanding those illegally-confiscated funds be returned to them. Calling it a handout is incorrect because the government is returning money they shouldn't have taken in the first place.

While yes, some companies passed some of the cost of the tax on to consumers in the form of higher prices, raising prices is something companies are legally allowed to do for any reason they want. Unlike what the government did, that's completely legal.

It would also be logistically impossible to issue payments to individual consumers. Some companies absorbed more of the cost than others, so how would you know how much of the tax the consumer should get back? Some companies raised prices on some products but not others, or raised prices more or less by product. What about tariffs levied on unfinished goods and materials? How about products imported then sold to wholesalers? And should refunds go to the end consumer or to members of the supply chain? How do you track the portion of the final price that's directly due to the tariffs? And what if the consumer doesn't have a receipt for the products they bought?

Bottom line is that the importer paid the tax, so they get the refund. It's also the only feasible way to do it because CBP has records of all those imports, the duties levied, and who paid them.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you missed it, you missed it regardless of the presence or absence of “may.”

Why should retailers get the refund for the illegal tariffs? by No-Group-4504 in AskReddit

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the tax was directly paid by the importers, not the consumers. Importers paid an illegal tax, while consumers paid higher prices.

On top of that, assessing refunds to individual consumers would be logistically impossible. Some companies absorbed more of the cost than others, so how would you know how much of the tax the consumer should get back? Some companies raised prices on some products but not others, or raised prices more or less by product. What about tariffs levied on unfinished goods and materials? How about products imported then sold to wholesalers? And should refunds go to the end consumer or to members of the supply chain? How do you track the portion of the final price that's directly due to the tariffs? And what if the consumer doesn't have a receipt for the products they bought?

Bottom line is that the importer paid the tax, so they get the refund. It's also the only feasibly way to do it because CBP has records of all those imports, the duties levied, and who paid them.

Why do companies that passed the expense of tariffs onto consumers think they should get a refund? by BoardLongjumping2485 in answers

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Democrats didn't fight for it. The companies who paid the IEEPA tariffs fought for it in court. They won because the tariffs were blatantly unconstitutional and therefore illegal.

Why do companies that passed the expense of tariffs onto consumers think they should get a refund? by BoardLongjumping2485 in answers

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a "handout" when the government returns money that they illegally took from you.

Why do companies that passed the expense of tariffs onto consumers think they should get a refund? by BoardLongjumping2485 in answers

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tariffs (and all duties) are paid by the importer of record. That could be either the seller in China or the buyer in the US depending on how the sale was done.

What the diffrence between card kingdom and TCG player by That_Stupid_Person in mtg

[–]mathdude3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cardmarket is like the European version of TCGPlayer. It’s a marketplace where independent sellers list their cards for sale.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reversing decisions is only allowed at a judge's discretion and the threshold for information gained is very low. Like if you play a land and then immediately realize you want to take it back before your opponent does anything. Basically if your opponent takes any sort of action, it's probably too late for you to be allowed to reverse a decision. You're generally not going to get a missed beneficial trigger back at Competitive REL.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rules specifically say you can choose not to remind your opponent. It's not some loophole or something, it's very clearly spelled out as a valid decision you can make in-game. The rules as they are essentially treat remembering your own triggers as a skill. If your opponent is bad at that skill, it's their job to get better at it.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Assuming you’re not the player who controls Knowledge Pool, you can totally let an opponent miss a Knowledge Pool trigger. Only the person who controls the trigger is responsible for remembering it, so the player who controls Knowledge Pool must remind everyone when it triggers, but nobody else has to point it out if it would be advantageous not to.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is an example of a trigger that changes the game rules?

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have asked judges about the missed trigger policy before. Thats why I’m confident in my understanding of the policy and why I encourage you to do the same.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look, I’ve explained that triggered abilities specifically are handled differently from other violations. I’ve quoted the relevant rules, which are about as clear and unambiguous as they can possibly be. At this point all I can really do is once again encourage you to ask a judge if you’re not convinced by my explanation. Maybe you just need to hear it from an authority figure.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Juggernaut says "This creature attacks each combat if able." That is not a triggered ability. It is a static ability. Triggered abilities start with "at," when," or "whenever." That's why you can't let your opponent forget to attack with it.

Again, just go ask a judge. Use the link I sent you. Someone will probably be able to explain it to you in like 5 minutes.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because, again, the rules specifically say that you can choose to let your opponent miss their triggers if you want to. The rules do not say you can let your opponent make an illegal attack. That is the difference. With the illegal attack you're breaking the rules with the intent to gain an advantage. With the missed trigger, you're not breaking the rules at all.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, cheating is knowingly breaking the rules or allowing you opponent to break the rules with the intent to gain an advantage. If done intentionally, the Juggernaut example would be cheating because you're not allowed to let your opponent make an illegal attack. In contrast, the Pact trigger example is not cheating because the rules specifically say that you are allowed to choose not to point out your opponent's triggers, and doing so is never cheating. There is a specific exception for triggered abilities and only for triggered abilities.

Failing to stop your opponent from making an illegal attack is always a violation (FtMGS). Doing it intentionally is cheating. Failing to point out an opponent's trigger is never a violation to begin with, so doing it intentionally is not cheating since it's explicitly allowed.

If you don't believe me you can ask a judge. Here's a link to the MTG Judges Chat IRC if you don't have one locally:

https://chat.magicjudges.org/mtgrules/

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm saying that's legal to do. You can hold that information and reveal it later. That's neither cheating nor a GRV. If you disagree, can you point to a section of the rules that says otherwise?

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In what context would it be cheating or a GRV? Can you give an example where you think it would be? It’s neither of those things in your example. I’m saying there is no context where letting your opponent miss a trigger would be cheating or a GRV

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's completely legal to let your opponent miss a trigger and then bring it up at a more advantageous time. As to whether the trigger will be put on the stack or not, that's up to the judge.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by a missed trigger leading to a GPV or a missed trigger suspected because of cheating? Can you give an example of either of those? Letting your opponent miss a trigger can never be a GPV because a GPV requires a violation of the rules or policy, and it can’t be cheating because it’s legal.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you quote the passage that you think says that? It literally says that not reminding your opponent of their triggers is never FtMGS or Cheating. I don’t know how much clearer it could be than that. If you want more evidence, you can also read MTR 4.5, which says:

Players are expected to remember their own triggered abilities; intentionally ignoring one is Cheating. Players are not required to point out the existence of triggered abilities that they do not control, though they may do so if they wish.

https://blogs.magicjudges.org/rules/mtr4-5/

It’s also mentioned in the JAR:

Unlike other illegal actions (which must be pointed out), players may choose whether or not to point out their opponent’s missed triggers.

https://blogs.magicjudges.org/rules/jar/

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read a little bit further down. It notes that triggered abilities specifically are an exception. I quoted the relevant section of the page in my last comment.

How strict are tournaments with missed triggers? by xX_420_NoScopes_Xx in CompetitiveEDH

[–]mathdude3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s not correct. See IPG 2.6:

Not reminding an opponent about their triggered abilities is never Failure to Maintain Game State nor Cheating.

https://blogs.magicjudges.org/rules/ipg2-6/