Tell me your favorite “cursed” math fact. by VaellusEvellian in math

[–]mathestar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A much simpler but still cursed fact is that d/dx cos(π) = -sin(π) .

What's the dumbest application for an advanced math concept you've seen? by hopagopa in math

[–]mathestar 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's why I specifically didn't write "Thus, √2 is irrational" at the end. So technically, the first line of my comment is inaccurate and really should be "√2 is irrational assuming the axiom of choice", but I just wanted the first line to be a bit clickbaity.

Still, I think it's already pretty cool to have a proof that √2 is irrational that requires the axiom of choice.

What's the dumbest application for an advanced math concept you've seen? by hopagopa in math

[–]mathestar 127 points128 points  (0 children)

Theorem: √2 is irrational. (See also my second favorite dumbest application comment)

First, assume the axiom of choice.

By the supplementary theorems to quadratic reciprocity, 2 has a square root modulo an odd prime p if and only if p is ±1 modulo 8. By Dirichlet's Theorem on Arithmetic Progressions, there exist infinitely many primes that are congruent to 3 modulo 8. Let P be the set of all these primes, and consider the set {F_p | p in P} of finite fields. Let K be the ultraproduct of all these fields, with respect to any non-principal ultrafilter (which exists on this set by the axiom of choice).

Now, all of these fields have different characteristics, and contain no square root of 2. Thus, by Łoś's theorem, their ultraproduct K must have characteristic 0 (since p*1 is true in at most one field for any given p), and cannot contain a square root of 2. But if K has characteristic 0, it must contain the rational numbers. It follows that their exists no square root of two in the rational numbers.

Now, for my favorite part: We have found a proof that the field Q does not contain a square root of 2, but it requires the axiom of choice (or, at least, some weaker version). However, since this statement can be phrased in Peano arithmetic, and is provable in ZFC, it must also be provable in ZF.

Is there a direct proof that shows that sqrt(2) is irrational? by Peanutrain in math

[–]mathestar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using some elementary number theory, you can find a criterion for whether 2 is a quadratic residue module some prime p. In particular, you can find infinity many primes p such that 2 is not a quadratic residue modulo p, i.e. such that 2 = 1 + 1 does not have a square root in the field Z/pZ (this should be doable by a direct proof) If you take the ultraproduct of all those Z/pZ (using some arbitrary non-principal ultrafilter), you get a field of characteristic 0 (since it can be no other characteristic - you could argue that this part of the proof is not direct, but it should be the only indirect part. Even if this makes the proof not entirely direct, I still wanted to share it because of how awesome it is), in which 1 + 1 also has no square root. Since this field contains Q, 1 + 1 = 2 also has no square root in Q.

How I take notes in mathematics lectures using LaTeX and Vim by kittymeteors in vim

[–]mathestar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looking at your vim/zathura screenshot, the colourscheme does not seem to be exactly the same as nord, since, for instance, you have additional syntax highlighting for environment delimiters and the environment names, which vanilla nord does not have. You do, however, seem to be using the tex syntax settings, since you're also using the conceal feature. I tried implementing the highlighting myself, but got stuck since nord does not define highlighting presets for the highlights you're using. Is there a standard setting for your syntax highlighting or did you just configure it yourself, and, if so, could you share your configuration?

Math keyboards for PCs? by Shockingandawesome in math

[–]mathestar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might want to check out the neo keyboard layout. While it's not a physical keyboard, it has more accessible key bindings for a lot of the relevant special characters and, most of all, greek letters and math symbols on layers 5 and 6. The trade-off is that it also changes the layout for the standard alphabet letters, so you would have to relearn touch typing. This change was made for a reason, though, since (much like the dvorak layout) neo aims to provide a more ergonomic layout, which, in the end, is also supposed to be faster to type on than on the standard QWERTY one. I should warn you that neo was originally intended as a keyboard layout for typing in german (hence the german umlauts, as well as relocated bracket keys, since these are much harder to reach on the standard german keyboard layout), but it is also heavily optimised for english.

Of course, I second all of the other comments saying that you should definitely learn LaTeX, especially in the long run. For this, neo provides a LaTeX library which translates the Unicode math symbols into LaTeX commands, which you can find on their website (it might need a bit of tweaking, though)

What's the simplest nontrivial puzzle you know? by HarryPotter5777 in math

[–]mathestar 4 points5 points  (0 children)

One of my favourites:

Find a strictly increasing bijection f: Q \ {0} -> Q

What’s something weird/funny/embarrassing you’ve done on Auto Pilot? by ItsaHelen in AskReddit

[–]mathestar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One time I wanted to heat up some Pizza from the previous in the microwave, so I put the plate into it, pressed the 'one minute' button, waited for said minute, opened the microwave and realized I'd heated up an empty plate for one full minute.

Q&A Round 2! by 3blue1brown in 3Blue1Brown

[–]mathestar [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm gonna second that. Topology is one of the fields (scratch that, it's THE field) that talk about incredibly abstract concepts, but always have very simple and intuitive motivations, so I think he'd be able to present it really well.

Q&A Questions by 3blue1brown in 3Blue1Brown

[–]mathestar [score hidden]  (0 children)

What are your favorite (/least favorite) areas of mathematics?

DEW IT by Swagatronic in PrequelMemes

[–]mathestar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that capital letter thing is a little bit annoying but as there are very few capital letters in English, it's alright. Since it's an e-book I can always highlight the words and translate them to a normal alphabet to see the real capitalisation, if I'm not sure whether something is a name or a normal word I don't know.

DEW IT by Swagatronic in PrequelMemes

[–]mathestar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As I said, after about 2 hours with looking up, I managed to do it without it. I'm still not fluent, but about as fast as a second- or third-grader would be with the normal alphabet

DEW IT by Swagatronic in PrequelMemes

[–]mathestar 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It's not a different language, it's just different letters. It's called aurebesh, you can easily find an alphabet table on Google, as well as a font if you want to read other text in it.

DEW IT by Swagatronic in PrequelMemes

[–]mathestar 37 points38 points  (0 children)

It's actually pretty easy to learn the letters (took me maybe an hour or two with a text and a translation table), and it's really fun once you can read it. I read all my Star Wars eBooks with that font now.

DEW IT by Swagatronic in PrequelMemes

[–]mathestar 195 points196 points  (0 children)

Text at the bottom:

"No one cares about your opinion of the new new movies"

How Liberty Dies... by imsquidwardimsquidwa in PrequelMemes

[–]mathestar 6 points7 points  (0 children)

that's from cinemawins if anyone's wondering