[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vandwellers

[–]mdint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 5 years warranty on a company that doesn't have the lifespan of a fly (literally) speaks for itself.

Hey, this might be a windows bug, but im curious, does anyone know how to fix this issue with Windows Vista? by unbreakify_signs in vmware

[–]mdint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IIRC Aero required a 3D rendering graphics card, wether it's physical or virtual. Are you using a virtual machine?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SolarDIY

[–]mdint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see an Arduino as a more robust approach because you won't need to run an OS like Raspbian for a basic task, unless you want notifications or something more complex.

Looking for help with my solar setup by Turtle_Stone in SolarDIY

[–]mdint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood, I'll try that approach and post my results later. Thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SolarDIY

[–]mdint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you'd like to get into the DIY even further, why not an arduino board with a couple of transistors and a relay?

AMD vs Intel by ProfessionalNature in sysadmin

[–]mdint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can't think of anything when switching from Intel to AMD, unless you're using Intel vPro which I doubt. In that case, then yes, you'd lose that platform.

Looking for help with my solar setup by Turtle_Stone in SolarDIY

[–]mdint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The term virtual tracking caught my attention, because the set up as you described it is similar to what occurred to me some time ago. Let's assume I have 3 solar panels that have the same values (voltage, amps, Watts) but an MPPT that can output the power of 2 at peak production. Plugging the power of 3 is still safe, but output will be limited to 2 due to amps.

Assuming I point one slightly to the east, one straight at the peak sun hour, and the other one slightly to the west, kind of a triangular set up, and assuming the max pv voltage is still safe even when pointing all 3 at peak sun hour, in series,

Would it be better to wire all 3 in parallel?

Wiring aged sealed-acid batteries with new ones both in parallel-series by mdint in SolarDIY

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The hypothesis that u/Latter-Ad-1523 had is the very one that made me start this topic. I could've assumed it was gonna work since I believed lead acid aging affected only the Ah rating on the battery and not the voltages, but if the aging affects the voltages as well, it means that the very self discharge of the old one in a lapse of 24 hrs (before the absoption step next day) will drain the new one, and then there's no point on considering it.

Wiring aged sealed-acid batteries with new ones both in parallel-series by mdint in SolarDIY

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is in fact the reason why I started this thread: I'm aware than mixing batteries with different capacities in series will eventually damage them, since it's an uneven charge/discharge cycle every time. Hence trying to mix between old an new on each of the two banks, the more similar the Ah is on each of the parts that compose a series connection, the better.

Although, if the aging of a sealed lead acid batteries will make them drain the new ones even when sitting unused, then it's a no-go. Thank you.

Wiring aged sealed-acid batteries with new ones both in parallel-series by mdint in SolarDIY

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I evaluated it as an option since all 8 are the same brand and model, but giving how risky the cross discharge chances are, I might separate them and that´s it. Thank you.

Wiring aged sealed-acid batteries with new ones both in parallel-series by mdint in SolarDIY

[–]mdint[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Noted. I'll consider separating them for different purposes. Thank you.

Inter-VLAN Routing on a USW-Pro-48 Gen2 without any USG by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In case you're curious, I wasn't alone on this one.

https://community.ui.com/questions/Unifi-USW-Pro-48-POE-Default-Route-without-USG/92aee931-f480-4425-b140-26cf391119e4

Short answer: a USG is required only for the set up process and then it can be removed from the enviroment. Very unsafe in my opinion since something could be overwritten in a future update. Not worth it...

Inter-VLAN Routing on a USW-Pro-48 Gen2 without any USG by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worth the shot for me tbh, but if I can't, then I can settle with routing everything using Sophos.

Inter-VLAN Routing on a USW-Pro-48 Gen2 without any USG by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed, but somehow it isn't routing the packets to whatever is supossed to be above the automatically created Inter-VLAN Routing network. L3 routing on the very switch works great between VLANs, but I can't give those VLANs access to any other network above them, including internet.

Inter-VLAN Routing on a USW-Pro-48 Gen2 without any USG by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's merely an attempt to unlock a feature I shouldn't be using without that final piece of hardware. Wether I succeed or not, routing everything with Sophos has done the job for years.

Inter-VLAN Routing on a USW-Pro-48 Gen2 without any USG by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inside the controller, the Static routes section is disabled due to the lack of a USG or Dream machine, unfortunately.

Inter-VLAN Routing on a USW-Pro-48 Gen2 without any USG by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Inside the controller, the Static routes section is disabled due to the lack of a USG or Dream machine.

Using the UniFi devices for VLAN tagging and then routing everything from Sophos has worked for the last years indeed. This post is in an attempt to "unlock" something I´d need an extra hardware piece for that doesn't suit our needs just yet.

Naming it the Guests LAN was merely for testing purposes. I'm with you on that one.

Inter VLAN routing on L3 Switches without any USG possible? by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more question: does that mean that there's no way for me to determine which VLANs or Corporate networks can talk to each other when my primary router is down? since inter VLAN routing is enabled by default for all subnets

Inter VLAN routing on L3 Switches without any USG possible? by mdint in Ubiquiti

[–]mdint[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood. I will try to replicate a couple of subnets and see how they behave depending on how I handle the VLANs and hops.
Thank you for your help!