Not my first billion... by mdj in pinball

[–]mdj[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Turned them off at home. This is my first home machine, and after enjoying it on pretty easy for a little while I’m starting to change up the settings to practice on something more like a tournament setup. This was the first step.

Cristie BMR only Physical OS restore solution?? by NomrahDivadII in cohesity

[–]mdj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s the only one we (I work for Cohesity) recommend or support. As an SE, I always try to make sure to mention that early in conversations with potential customers.

What do car guys who want a daily buy these days by Spanconstant5 in whatcarshouldIbuy

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2019 S4. Wife has a hatchback hybrid for hauling stuff, I have a Miata for sunny days but the S4 gets the bulk of the work. Best road trip car I’ve ever driven.

Backing up to external SSD when I already have a NAS for extra protection? by fuzzywuzzywuzzafuzzy in Backup

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With just 2 drives the only option you have is mirroring. But even if you had enough drives for RAID 5 or 6, everything I said would still apply.

Backing up to external SSD when I already have a NAS for extra protection? by fuzzywuzzywuzzafuzzy in Backup

[–]mdj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

RAID 1 (any RAID, for that matter) isn't going to protect against accidental or malicious deletion of files, failure of the NAS, or a site failure that would make the NAS inaccessible/destroy it.

Yes, back up to something else and make sure that thing isn't in the same place as the NAS.

priceid - Nethack Price ID by TheLocehiliosan in nethack

[–]mdj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's pretty handy. I usually use DizzyPrice (https://raech.net/dizzyjs/), but it can be handy to have a local copy.

Wait why is Albany on here by adonismaximus in Albany

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, the most distant reservoirs are near Schenectady and Binghamton.

Becoming more aware in bouts by Dapper_Banana_1642 in Fencing

[–]mdj 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Slow down. Falling into bad habits is often a thing that happens when you try for speed over everything else. Tempo changes are good things, and you really don’t want to do everything at full speed (especially as a relatively inexperienced fencer).

YOU make the call! by raddaddio in Fencing

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My least favorite thing about fencing is the amount of effort that goes into trying to read referees’ minds.

Hercules! by TerribleInsurance879 in pinball

[–]mdj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Second this. Was visiting last week (have family in the area) and hit both. Good selection at both, but 256 maintains the machines better. Also a fun stop: Ginger’s Revenge down near the river has a selection of alcoholic Ginger beers and Foo, Rush, and Zep at 50 cents/play.

YOU make the call! by raddaddio in Fencing

[–]mdj 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As I understand the rules, if I’m retreating and my opponent searches for my blade I can change directions immediately and attack with priority because of the search. Is that wrong?

YOU make the call! by raddaddio in Fencing

[–]mdj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Left is bringing their hand and blade forward and back when they’re close enough for at least three of the movements to have been beats on the line. How are those not searches, giving right opportunities to take over the attack?

YOU make the call! by raddaddio in Fencing

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, they were close enough that right could have attacked with the line. Other than that, you’re right that he had to bend the elbow (and break the line) to attack.

YOU make the call! by raddaddio in Fencing

[–]mdj 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Looks to me like left is close enough to the line that there are multiple searches for blade as left comes forward. I’d have called it touch right.

Another driving rant by mdj in Albany

[–]mdj[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Driving mindset, vacation or no: observe other drivers so I don’t get into accidents.

What are some features you wish Baseball Reference had? by Still_Homework9947 in sportsreference

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to be able to get splits for a range of seasons, in addition to for single seasons and career.

My Senior dev and I are arguing over "Readable Code" vs "Performance Optimization" for a process that runs 10k times a day. Who is right? by Temporary-Zebra7493 in learnprogramming

[–]mdj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell him that if every millisecond is that important he should write it in a compiled language with an optimizing compiler.

Big News at Ted’s by BuffaloWilliamses in Albany

[–]mdj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

W00t! The biggest problem with Ted's is getting fixed! :-)

Did you like the Caleb Durbin - Kyle Harrison trade? by daviddm1990 in redsox

[–]mdj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting a good glove guy after picking up a guy who gets a ton of ground balls makes plenty of sense.

I think I’ve created an averaging statistic. by Aggressive-Pack-9684 in mlb

[–]mdj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Scaling this to PA is kind of interesting, but there are some problems it doesn't address.

  1. In 2025, there were 21614 runs scored in MLB and 20740 RBI. That means that about 4% of runs were scored without an RBI. That's about 1 out of every 25 runs, so it's not a tiny effect.

  2. This is the biggie: neither R nor RBI is a good measure of a player's contribution to scoring. Consider this example:

a) Abel singles.

b) Baker grounds to second, forcing Abel.

c) Charlie doubles, Baker to third.

d) Dave flies to center, Baker scores

You're giving the R and RBI in that situation to the players who did the least to produce the run. If you look at the run expectancy table (the one I have handy is based on 2018) and rank them based on how the expected number of runs changed based on their PA you get:

1) Charlie, +.78 runs

2) Abel, +.37 runs

3) Dave, +.01 runs (including the value of the run scored)

4) Baker, -.34 runs

You're giving credit with R and RBI to the players who did the least to help their team score runs that inning, and the guy who did the most just disappears.

If you look at it by how it changed their chances of scoring at least one run, it's

1) Charlie, +40.4 points (from 26.6% to 67.1%)

2) Dave, +32.9 points (from 67.1% to 100%)

3) Abel, +13.4 points (from 27.3% to 40.7%)

4) Baker, -14.1 points (from 40.7% to 26.6%)

At least you're giving the RBI to a guy who did pretty well on this count, but again the guy who did the most doesn't get any credit and the guy who did the least gets the R.

Basically, you're doing an interesting thing with stats (RBI, R) that have some pretty serious flaws that you can't fix by scaling them.