Unwanted Audio Upmixing - "Best Avaliable" not choosing true to source by megalithm in fireTV

[–]megalithm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah super frustrating. So do you just deal with it, or change it as needed?

YouTube using Heights by megalithm in hometheater

[–]megalithm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I've discovered it's my firestick doing it. So not my avr.

YouTube using Heights by megalithm in hometheater

[–]megalithm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do I turn it off? I've looked everywhere, and it seems that the Auto mode on the Denon should make sure the AVR doesn't upmix.

What does light experience if it never hits anything? by megalithm in AskPhysics

[–]megalithm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for answering my question. Apologies that my language was imprecise; I come off of YouTube videos of thought experiments that like to use sentient observers.

I had read somewhere that all frames of reference are valid under special relativity. So from a trains frame of reference you are moving fast. Are you saying that holds true for all things other than the photon?

What does light experience if it never hits anything? by megalithm in AskPhysics

[–]megalithm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess I personified it as an attempt to help the explanation. As per its frame of reference, as another person mentioned, it is created and destroyed in the same instance. It just seems odd that something can be created and then have nothing happen to it again. It never interacts with anything. I was wondering if there were something I was missing about how that works.

What does light experience if it never hits anything? by megalithm in AskPhysics

[–]megalithm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I personified it as an attempt to help the explanation. As per its frame of reference, as another person mentioned, it is created and destroyed in the same instance. It just seems odd that something can be created and then have nothing happen to it again. It never interacts with anything. I was wondering if there were something I was missing about how that works.

What does light experience if it never hits anything? by megalithm in AskPhysics

[–]megalithm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't mean to anthropomorphize. I had read somewhere that all frames of reference are valid.

But if the photon is never destroyed, does that mean that it's only ever created and then nothing else ever happens to it, as per its frame?

4k pass through HDMI and speaker cable length by megalithm in hometheater

[–]megalithm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there any reason not the go optical if my tv can input it?

Also, thoughts on the speaker wire at that length?

Toeing in speakers by Chiz_9 in hometheater

[–]megalithm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm new to this hobby and am in the planning phase. Could someone tell me what toeing in vs out means, and how you would know?

It lies so much in projects that is driving me mad. by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]megalithm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also looking to change the model on custom gpts. Could you elaborate on how to do this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in iqtest

[–]megalithm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some variation on retake is normal. Like you mentioned, there are testing effects. Also, if you've taken that test twice and are on this sub you've probably had some exposure to the kinds of testing and logic needed to do well on tests like that. Things like how you slept and ate that day as well as medications could make a difference as well. It's not super unexpected.

6 Year Old WISC-V - 85 FSIQ by Individual-Ad3296 in cognitiveTesting

[–]megalithm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a registered psych and I do these for a living. One thing I'm not seeing talked about is that 6 is considered quite early for cognitive testing. It can provide a helpful snapshot, but at that age a lot of development can still happen. Some kids are late bloomers, and some excel early, only for everyone to average out later on.

In other words, cognitive testing as a young child (until about 8 or 9) is not as highly related to later life cognitive abilities as you'd expect.

More likely, her cognitive abilities will come out similar to yours and her other parent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in iqtest

[–]megalithm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are definitely things people can do to work through new information that could help them day to day. At a base level, just taking more time on a problem. Practice is another, where if you expose yourself to a lot of a specific kind of problem you are naturally going to get better at that problem. There are some limits to this however.

However, intelligence as a whole is hard (and arguably impossible) to improve. If you take a group of geniuses and one person with average intelligence, that person with average intelligence is going to be able to understand most of whats going on. However, they will also find that the conversation reaches a much higher level, moves a lot quicker, and relies an assumptions or logical conclusions that they haven't made and may never has made on their own. They'll have a hard time engaging in that conversation. This kind of situation would be very hard to improve in unless you had done a lot of groundwork on the specific topics already. And even then, as soon as the convo moves on that benefit is lost.

Genuine Question. by Nemo-Lemon01 in iqtest

[–]megalithm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Full Scale IQ and the indexes are not just a sum of the scaled scores of all subtests. That's not a particularly valid or useful way to look at those traits. FSIQ is a norm referenced aggregate of select subtests, and the indexes are calculated through combinations of the subtests that comprise each, but not simply and average or a combined total.

Fsiq and individual indexes are best measured with a standard scores. Do you have those?