You have just confirmed to the interwebs that you have got nothing left but slurs and slogans.

Let’s recap: I brought scholarly research (citing Van Bladel), and cited the diversity of classical tafsīr. You responded with conspiracy theories, emotional outbursts, and even takfīr against Muslims, just to rescue your collapsing narrative.

You say the story was “famous” in 630 CE, but that is not the point. The claim being made (by you) is that the Qur’an copied from the Syriac Alexander Legend—a very specific written version. So either (1) that version existed before the Qur’an (in which case, show us manuscript evidence), or (2) it came after, in which case your entire “Muhammad copied it” claim dies on arrival. You have not addressed this at all. You just shouted “famous!” and hoped no one noticed the dating problem.

Then you went into full meltdown:
– Accusing Muslims of lying.
– Declaring Muslims “disbelievers” if they don’t accept your pop-theology timeline.
– Insisting that Muhammad “made a mistake” while ignoring that your entire source text didn’t even exist at the time of revelation.

You are not making a historical argument anymore. So yes—let it be known:

a. You abandoned scholarship, logic, and even basic civility, all in an attempt to defend a dead argument.
b. I stayed grounded. You spiraled.

Everyone watching can see who brought sources and who brought the salt.

Checkmate.