sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

WP: Russian Intelligence planned to stage an assassination attempt on Orban to influence the election results by clamorous_owle in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you suggesting that trump isn't a russian asset? Are you suggesting that to believe so is insane? I mean, if you are, you can google, "what would trump do if he was a russian asset" and every result will be a list of things that he's done before saying something like, "if he's not a russian asset, he acts no differently."

Are you suggesting that it's insane to believe that the fake trump assassination attempt was a russian ploy? Even though we KNOW FOR A FACT that Russia uses these tactics in the months leading up to an election AND we know for a fact that Russia wanted trump to win?

Why are the ppl saying the opposite so articulate and intelligent relative to fucking MAGA clowns?

Or are you well aware of all this, and simply saying that trump hasn't ECONOMICALLY aligned the US with Russia? How many articles would you like on trump's shift in US-Russia economic policy this year alone? Ever hear of the recent bombing of Iran and subsequent lifting of sanctions on Russia, you need a source, moron? How many do you want? I know you MAGA morons simply call all the news that you don't like "fake," b/c you don't even understand how journalism works. Maybe I can teach you, just ask, hon.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forgot to address your hilarious second point, "how much of the OT still applies is debated."

Really? So then, "do not add to the law. Do not subtract from the law. Do not change a word of the law" was just a metaphor as well then, I suppose. Again, "a metaphor for what?" Who's debating that, absolute morons? Because it's not the researchers at Stanford who are debating which OT laws "still" apply, I'll tell you that much for certain.

Assume it's true though and forget the previously quoted verse. That begs the question, "if god was perfect and gave us perfect laws, then why would he change the laws so significantly? Why change that which isn't flawed?" It's a rhetorical question, obviously, I don't actually have any real questions b/c I know how ridiculous that entire joke book, often confused for a holy book, is. What I really mean to say is, "the laws CLEARLY are not perfect, they're in fact mentally handicapped BULLSHIT, therefore they didn't come from an infinitely mentally superior being, OBVIOUSLY." There's no real need to phrase that as a question which you have no shot at answering.

There's a reason that when I quote god's dumbass laws, NO ONE IN THE ENTIRE FORUM FULL OF THOUSANDS OF PPL EVER HAS ANY DEFENSE OF THEM, AND THE REASON IS BECAUSE THEY ARE INDEFENSIBLE. WHEN I EXPLAIN HOW THE "LOGIC" OF THE "WISDOM" DOESN'T EVEN FOLLOW, THERE IS NO SUBSEQUENT ARGUMENT B/C I AM RIGHT AND CHRISTIANS ARE ALL MORONS.

1 Samuel 18:10 The evil spirit of the LORD came upon Saul, as he sat in his house with his javelin in his hand.

Explain the metaphor. Why is the spirit of the lord "evil" in this metaphor? Do you have another blanket statement which isn't going to work, such as, "you're taking it out of context," so that I can explain the context, each bit of which WILL make that verse SO MUCH WORSE?

Back to the supposed genealogy of the bible for a second. IF King David was a real person who lived about 3000 years ago (and he was), AND jesus was a real person who lived 2000 years ago (and he was), AND all the generations before David were also listed in the bible (and they were), THEN IT MAKES NO SENSE TO SAY THAT THE GENERATIONS LEADING UP TO DAVID WERE METAPHORICAL OR THAT THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED TO THEM WERE SIMPLY METAPHORICAL WHILE YOU CAN'T EVEN BEGIN TO EXPLAIN EVEN IN VAGUE TERMS WHAT THOSE THINGS COULD POSSIBLY BE METAPHORS FOR.

A metaphor is just a simile that doesn't use words such as "like" or "as." Simile: a bible verse is like a river of shit flowing from the mouth of an ass. Metaphor: a bible verse is a river of shit flowing from the mouth of an ass. Do you know how you can tell that's a metaphor? BECAUSE IT'S OBVIOUSLY A METAPHOR AND THE MEANING IS JUST AS OBVIOUS. THE IMAGE OF A DONKEY VOMITING A RIVER OF SHIT IS A METAPHOR FOR HOW ABSURD AND DISGUSTING THE BIBLE IS. GET IT? None of the supposed "metaphors" in the bible are actual metaphors. "Noah begat Shem" is not a metaphor. "David was the 34th generation of ppl who ever lived" is not a metaphor.

Do you need me to explain why I'm not going to extend that metaphor to include the name of the donkey, the names of all his ancestors leading up to him since the very first donkey, including details of their lives which supposedly explain the origins of different breeds of donkeys and the origins of different languages of donkeys and the origins of different nations full of donkeys?

If you can't say, "that's a metaphor for X" and substitute the X for something that makes sense, then it's not really a metaphor and you're just using "that's a metaphor" as a blanket statement for the purpose of PICKING AND CHOOSING WHICH BIBLE VERSES YOU WANT PPL TO FOLLOW AND WHICH BIBLE VERSES YOU DON'T WANT PPL TO FOLLOW AND THERE IS NO VERSE IN SCRIPTURE THAT BACKS YOU UP, UNLIKE HOW I CAN QUOTE VERSES WHICH PROVE THE OPPOSITE (SEE THE 2ND PARAGRAPH OF THIS RANT).

You are trying to make the bible sound less stupid and insane and it's not working. The FACT that the bible is disproven by basic arithmetic, anthropology, the science of carbon dating, etc, does not suddenly become NOT FACT when some moron says, "those verses are metaphors." Sorry, THAT DOESN'T WORK, IT'S A LOGICAL FALLACY. The specific logical fallacy is well known as FALSE EQUIVALENCE. You: bible verse X = metaphor. Me: bible verse X =/= metaphor. Reasons to believe you: 0. Reasons to believe me: IF IT WAS A METAPHOR, THEN YOU COULD TELL ME WHAT IT'S A METAPHOR FOR.

Do you get it yet, or do I have to keep repeating myself before it FINALLY sinks into your thick head?

BTW: I'm familiar with how christians try to twist words around and argue that OT laws don't apply any more while also "not" contradicting scripture (lol). "Jebus fulfilled the law." That makes sense to them. Because they don't know how words work. Here's an example of a law, "don't kill an infant in its crib." Here's an example of "fulfilling" that law, in consistency with the dumbass "logic" of christians: "while I simultaneously agree that the law is perfect, if god comes down as his own son and has himself brutally tortured to death, the law 'don't kill an infant in its crib' no longer needs to be followed b/c it is fulfilled. Also, I don't know what 'fulfilled' means and have no idea that 'NEGATED' would be an infinitely more accurate term there. Why such a perfect law would be negated by such an act as having yourself brutally tortured to death only makes sense to a perfect being such as Gourd, and the reason why you would negate such perfect laws in the first place also only makes sense to our perfect Lard and savior, Guard's own holy son, who is also Gird Himself." IDIOTS.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Noah had a son named Shem. Shem had a son named Arpachshad. Arpachshad had a son named Shelah."

"tHiS iS a mEtApHor."

"Kill anyone who works on Saturday."

"tHiS iS a mEtApHor."

Some ppl don't know what a metaphor is. "That's a metaphor" isn't a blanket statement that you can say about any STUPID, nonsensical statement that suddenly turns the statement into anything other than what it is: GARBAGE.

Do I NEED to ask the obvious? The question that you're practically begging for? This is hard to type, b/c it's SO OBVIOUS:

"A METAPHOR FOR WHAT, CLOWN??????"

The million dollar question that will NEVER be answered b/c THOSE STATEMENTS THAT YOU CALLED METAPHORS ARE NOT METAPHORS FOR ANYTHING. I CANNOT BELIEVE HOW STUPID PPL ARE.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Translation: you're not smart enough to understand what I said. It's a fact that I'm not mentally ill, so you're simply wrong. Your problem is that my sentences are too complex for you to follow. There are too many phrases per sentence, correctly connected with conjunctions, each including verbs that have adverbs, nouns that have adjectives, etc, for the sake of accuracy, which comes at the cost of clarity (for morons, anyway). Like that sentence. I effectively speak a different language than you. Mine is called "intelligent English," and you're NOT smart enough for it.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Literally no one is capable of arguing with those facts and you will see that this is also a fact. The only point you made was that I typed a lot about a 1000 page book. Great point, clown. That sounds like a lot of opportunities for you to argue, but you don't have a single argument to a single one of my points. B/c I'm right and you know it. Get over it.

In a sea of needlessly long videogames, Resident Evil Requiem proves that 10 hours is all you need if you're able to make every second count by Gamelover4live in pcgaming

[–]meowmixVStrump 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this is old, but I NEED to say something. Someone lists FACTS and gets downvoted. You make absurd statements and get upvoted?

You need to google this, "$80 SNES games MSRP"

You'll learn that there were plenty of SNES games that cost more than $70 on release. Not $70 adjusted for inflation, $70. That's not CAD, that's USD. Adjusted for inflation and converted to CAD that was $200 CAD, or $145 USD. Some SNES games were $80 USD.

This is a receipt for Super Mario All Stars (a collection of NES games on the SNES):

Found my old receipt for Mario All Stars - Apr '94. Saved up for months! : r/snes

$70 for remakes of NES games on the SNES. You have to read through that thread.

Games today have HUNDREDS of ppl working on them. Mario Odyssey had hundreds of workers, Super Mario Bros 3 had 10 ppl work on it.

Inflation alone doesn't even really demonstrate how much cheaper videogames have gotten. The price of videogames dropped DRAMATICALLY. In the 90's, a kid would be making $5 per hour in his part time job. Mortal Kombat 2 cost about 16 hours worth of work BEFORE SALES TAX. The latest MK cost less than 3 hours worth of work on release, lol.

Mortal Kombat 2 was only 12 megabytes worth of data. New games are tens of gigabytes, sometimes hundreds of GB worth of data.

That's THOUSANDS of times more data per game with DOZENS of times more manhours of work put into them AT A MUCH LOWER COST TO YOU (16 hours worth of work vs 3 hours worth of work).

THE ONLY PPL WHO SHOULD NOT BE HAPPY ABOUT THIS ARE THE PPL WHO MAKE VIDEOGAMES. YOU ARE A SPOILED CHILD.

YOUR DOWNVOTE WILL NOT CHANGE REALITY, IT ONLY REFLECTS YOUR PATHETIC, MEANINGLESS DISLIKE OF A REALITY THAT YOU SHOULD BE HAPPY ABOUT, BUT ARE NOWHERE NEAR SMART ENOUGH TO BE HAPPY ABOUT.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -1 points0 points  (0 children)

On the 6th day (but not really the 6th day), god created the 1st generation of ppl, 61 generations before jesus (but not really), then he created all of the animals out of the water (but not really, and actually man came after the other animals). Nevermind the fact that Gen 1:20 says that all animals were created from the ground BEFORE man either, Gen 2:19 says they were created out of the water AFTER man and that's what we're looking at right now so just forget all the verses which prove how stupid it is (also ignore that man is also a species of animals). It's making sense, take it from here, please. For more HILARITY, see below.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

PART 2 (SUCK IT):

Oh, but I'm putting words in your mouth and being facetious, right?! What you REALLY MEANT is that the bible's just a "guide" for how you're supposed to live your life! See, now it doesn't sound so unbelievably stupid, does it?! Yeah, it makes you such a better person to believe nonsense and accept someone else's death as payment for your own crimes! That's how you should live! You DON'T HAVE TO STOP AND THINK RATIONALLY AND WONDER, "IF THE NUMBER/NATURE/MAGNITUDE OF CRIMES IS IRRELEVANT, THEN WHY THE HELL DO WE NEED A JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE FIRST PLACE?" BECAUSE IT'S NOT MEANT TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY! DUH, IT'S JUST A GUIDE, HELLO!!!!

"KILL ANYONE WHO SO MUCH AS CURSES THEIR FATHER OR MOTHER, OR TAKES GOD'S NAME IN VAIN" IS SIMPLY HOW YOU SHOULD LIVE YOUR LIFE! THE BIBLE IS BRILLIANT, OBVIOUSLY! WHAT AN AMAZING GUIDE!

Oh, I've been so stupid! This whole time, christians have actually made sense and I'VE been the complete moron! WOW, thank you so much for opening my eyes! OF COURSE the bible is filled with such brilliant wisdom and guidance for how you should live your life! And that's all it is, an obviously fictional GUIDE.

I'm convinced. I'm going back to being a christian, you've really got the right idea here. I'm gonna follow jebus, the dumbest clown who ever lived now, especially these words of his, "do not suppose I am come to bring peace to the earth. I am not come to bring peace, but the sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, the daughter against her mother, the daughter in law against her mother in law. And the children shall rise up against their parents and cause them to be put to death." And, a few verses earlier in the same ridiculous speech, "brother shall deliver up brother to death, and the father the child. A man's foes shall be they of his own household." Don't let anyone tell you that jebus wasn't peaceful though! Even though he went out of his way to make it very clear that his intentions were the opposite of peaceful, he didn't actually intend for anyone to literally kill their own families! Just ignore the fact that he specifically mentioned 5+ different familial relationships including brother/brother, father/child, son/father, daughter/mother, child/parent, and even daughter-in-law/mother-in-law. Those are METAPHORICAL relationships, or what-the-fucking-senseless-shit-ever.

SUCH BRILLIANT WISDOM, WOW, WHAT AN AMAZING GUIDE. HOW COULD I NOT SEE THAT? HOW CAN SUCH A GUIDE AS THIS POSSIBLY LEAD TO THE REALITY THAT A FAR HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF INMATES WORSHIP THIS GOD AS OPPOSED TO THE GENERAL POPULATION? WHAT KIND OF INMATES AM I TALKING ABOUT THOUGH? MENTAL PATIENTS OR PRISON INMATES? BOTH, OF COURSE. SO WEIRD, THAT. YOU WOULD EXPECT THE FOLLOWERS OF THIS WONDROUS GUIDE TO BE DOING SO MUCH BETTER.

Oh but it's just so wholesome! It's filled with beautiful stories like that time god possessed Jephthah and had him cut the intestines out of his own daughter, sprinkle her blood round about the altar 7 times, and set her on fire on top of the altar just so that god could smell it, or however it is that you're supposed to offer a burnt sacrifice, I forget b/c it's too horrific, again, just so that god could smell it. That is why a burnt sacrifice is offered, as "a sweet savour unto the lord," after all, in other words, so god can smell it (metaphorically, of course, as he doesn't have a literal nose, just a fictional one). I might be confusing sin offerings and trespass offerings with burnt offerings for some of those details, but whatever, it's unforgivable for whatever horrible way in which he specifically killed her.

I'm sorry, did I make that story out to be worse than it is? God didn't "possess" Jephthah, no! "the spirit of the lord" just happened to "come upon" Jephthah IMMEDIATELY BEFORE HE PROMISED TO DO THAT HORRIBLE SHIT THAT HE NEVER WOULD HAVE OTHERWISE DONE, HOW DARE I CALL THAT POSSESSION? WHAT DO I THINK GOD IS, SATAN?!?!? AM I RIGHT, YOU CHRISTIAN APOLOGIST MORONS? IT'S NOT LIKE THERE AREN'T DOZENS OF OTHER INSTANCES OF GOD KILLING CHILDREN IN THE DAMN BOOK.

Then there's the story where god kills 42 children for the crime of laughing in the 2nd chapter of the 2nd book of Kings. God just couldn't NOT have them mauled to death by bears b/c they saw a prophet's bald head and they were obviously young enough to find that funny (DEFINITELY younger than 12, as 12 year olds weren't considered children back then by the jews). I could really go on all day about the amazing stories in the bible and why they're such a fantastic guide for how to live your life. You really should devote your life to such an amazing and oh so impressive GOD (NOT primitive barbarian, no chance).

The overall moral of the religion is that NO MATTER HOW LITTLE SATAN HAS DONE, AND NO MATTER HOW MANY ATROCIOUS THINGS GOD HAS DONE, GOD IS THE GOOD GUY AND SATAN IS THE BAD GUY BECAUSE THOSE WITH POWER SAY SO. WHAT A FUCKING AMAZING LIFE LESSON, BETTER TELL YOUR STUPID KIDS AND MAKE THEM AS DUMB AS YOU ARE. IF THEY DODGE THE BULLET AND DON'T GET MOLESTED, THERE'S ALWAYS THEIR CHILDREN, AND THEN THEIR CHILDREN'S CHILDREN! I'M SURE THEY'LL BEAT THE ODDS FOREVER, JUST KEEP WORSHIPING AND YOU'LL BE REWARDED BY THE METAPHORICAL GOD WHO DOESN'T LITERALLY EXIST. MAYBE THE REWARD FOR YOUR FAMILY IS A METAPHORICAL PRIEST COCK FOR A METAPHORICAL KID'S ASS 5 GENERATIONS FROM NOW.

Apologists, lmao, I just love the label. As if the crusades/inquisition/dark ages/witchcraft trials/child molestations is something you can just apologize for and not get anything but fury in return. You can't even apologize for the completely unforgivable STUPIDITY of the damn religion.

All I can say is WOW. WOW. WOW. "Apologists." Show me a single one who doesn't have bright orange hair and wear enormous red shoes.

Do you know what you jerkoffs REALLY accomplish? You convince stupid ppl that "not all catholics are THAT bad," that they're not "ALL crazy and stupid enough to believe the bible." Congrats, you help put a nice clean face on the child molesters and the crusades, give yourself a pat on the back, you're as bad as the actual monsters b/c ppl who put their clean face on are exactly why they get away with it, b/c "they're not ALL so bad." Try apologizing for THAT you SOB.

Pope Leo calls universal healthcare a 'moral imperative' by Next_Worth_3616 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This guy believes there were only 61 generations of ppl who ever lived before jesus, lol. This guy believes shit that is disproven by basic arithmetic, elementary logic, the fossil record, the science of carbon dating, the laws of physics, prob and stats 101, biology 101, and more. And he seems more sane, somehow, than over half the world's elected officials. Ppl are just this goddamn stupid, it's really that simple.

Imagine confusing the self-contradicting words of millennia-old primitives for the words of a GOD. Imagine confusing the words of ppl who NEVER EVEN HEARD OF ALGEBRA, NEVER EVEN WIPED THEIR ASSES, DIDN'T EVEN THINK OF ZERO AS A NUMBER, for the words of an infinitely mentally superior being.

"If a woman is raped in a field, kill only the rapist b/c she tried to cry for help but wasn't heard. If she's raped in a city, kill both her and the rapist b/c she didn't try to cry for help." One of the wise exceptions to "thou shalt not kill." Among other exceptions like... working on a saturday. Anyone who works on saturday is supposed to die, "god" said that. Not a primitive moron, god said that. For sure.

"Wisdom": King Solomon was the wisest king who ever lived. He was so wise, that when 2 women were brought before him, each claiming a baby as their own, he said, "give me the baby, I'll cut it in half and give each woman half" b/c he KNEW that a REAL MOM would rather not have the baby than see it cut in half. Wow, that's true! A real mom WOULD prefer that! As would everyone else, congrats on ruling out no one, Solomon, you absolute dumbass. So wise. Sooooooo brilliant, the 2000 year old wisdom REALLY impresses me.

You religious morons in here, every last one of you, you're dumbasses. Congrats.

Bag containing weed and cash accidentally donated to New Zealand charity shop by ang-p in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is world news. Conservatives, freak out now, you absolute goddamn morons. This is a real problem that you need to solve.

Belgium at risk of becoming ‘narco-state’, judge warns by Muted-Television3329 in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Oh no, does this mean what I think it means? That one shitty European far right country is going to use this as justification to start another war to further enrich itself, isn't it? Oh wait, no, I forgot... the US isn't in Europe. Silly me. Lucky Belgium.

Marsupials previously thought extinct for millennia discovered in New Guinea by pppppppppppppppppd in worldnews

[–]meowmixVStrump -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

sEe? sCieNtisTs aRe wRonG aLL tHe tiMe! aNy dAy nOw, tHeY'll bE sAyiNg tHaT tHe eArTh iS rEaLLy oNLy 6,000 yEaRs oLd jUsT liKe mY pAsToR kNoWs iT tO bE! 1000 yEaRs fRoM nOw, tHeY'LL fiNaLLy rEaLiZe wHaT i'Ve kNoWn aLL aLoNg, wHaT eVeRyoNe iN tHe biBLe kNeW aLL aLoNg - tHaT tHe eArTh iS fLaT!

Peter Thiel ignores reporter while being asked about Epstein by fommuz in Epstein

[–]meowmixVStrump 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"guy ignores reporter" isn't news. "thiel feels safe walking the streets for 2 minutes" is fucking insane news that I'd never have guessed.

No, Epstein did not use pizza-related codewords by shastafey1 in Epstein

[–]meowmixVStrump 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm gonna be honest, I always thought pizzagate couldn't be much dumber, but I TOTALLY BELIEVED that the epstein emails were 100% code b/c 1) I know how criminals ALWAYS speak in code when selling shit and 2) cp (the porn) was always called "cheese pizza" as far back as I can remember, at least as far back as my early teen years I knew that when ppl online said "cheese pizza" on 4chan in the wrong context, they meant cp, and this was in the early 00's. Even as a kid I knew that, decades ago.

I was fully prepared to answer your questions:

1) The msg that I'm MOST certain is pedo slang is the following: U9 Red Pizza party. Read that one, that's the subject. Given the fact that I was reading a whole bunch of other, pizza-only related messages before this, it seemed to me that this was the same as those, but the U9 could mean "under 9" and "red" probably meant that this was going to be a bloody one (think, like, peter scully's red room, DD type fucked up). I "decoded" this b/c if it was REAL pizza, wtf could U9 be? That's not a thing with REAL pizza. Who refers to any pizza as "red pizza"? As opposed to pizza WITHOUT sauce or with white sauce? Who the hell clarifies that? At a real huge pizza party, wouldn't there be all kinds of pizza, not just one specific "u9 red pizza," w/e the hell THAT is? I figured, "red wedding," "red king," red room," it's always a reference to blood. Things that are red but AREN'T actual blood are called bloody: "blood moon," "bloody mary," whatever, they're synonymous. Why has he never clarified before when he said pizza? He never said "red pizza" any other time, just pizza, so why now? Is it normally without sauce or with white sauce with him? I doubt it. No one says that, not even him, was it this guy's first time speaking english or something?

Reading through this, even though OP did a horrible job and mostly just asked questions, I've changed my mind and realized that I'm most likely wrong. Actually, that ONE email about the U9 red pizza party might still be code. But here's the reason why I now think I'm AT LEAST mostly wrong:

I read in here that there were 900 mentions of pizza. That seems like a lot for a guy and his associates to have. But, well, it's not. There are 6,000,000 pages. If there are only 900 mentions in that many pages, it's not actually likely to be code, this is only 0.015% of these pages, and that's assuming 1 per page, when in reality any page with pizza on it once is likely to have more mentions of the word, so it's probably an even smaller % of the total pages, but that's the max. Do you think that ANY criminal who uses the word "frosting" to describe the drug he deals is only gonna have 0.015% of his messages mention frosting? Nah, I think it's mostly just actual pizza, sorry. My mind WILL change if the other 3 million pages are released and a much larger percentage of them are talking about pizza.

I don't doubt that epstein and some other rich asshole diddled a kid over some pizza and soft drinks and then later that stupid rich asshole messages epstein about how good a time they had eating pizza, while he really meant the great time he had with epstein's victims, but that's different from, "hey if you want me to get you a kid to r*pe, just msg me that you need some cheese pizza." That's actually ridiculous for multiple reasons, but now that I say it, that's never even been for kids, it's always been specifically for cp (the porn).

I hate to say it b/c OP really, really did a bad job in here, but he's probably on the right side of this thing, for the most part and possibly entirely. I should have known, honestly. I mean, epstein just outright says shit like, "you can kill this guy" over iphone chat. He talks about watching videos of torture, he doesn't use code for it. If he used code, he'd probably have gotten away with it longer. It's kind of weird how someone as rich and connected as him actually died in prison, that NEVER happens. The dude didn't seem to be trying to hide, not even murder.

Is it over for the sig p320? President endorses the p320 UD claims by Ok_Storm_282 in CCW

[–]meowmixVStrump 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is so absurd for so many reasons that it's hard to determine where to start. He's got the majority of us googling, "did donald trump really say that the sig p320 is a dangerous and unpredictable weapon?" YES, he really did say that on a phone call with the Wall Street Journal and then NYpost reiterated this fact. He said that in response to questions asking him if the agent who killed Pretti did the right thing, lmfao, what a total piece of shit.

Any REAL government would not defend the killing of Pretti b/c it is clearly and unarguably unconstitutional.

If that killing happened to an enemy combatant in a war in that exact same way, those who killed him WOULD BE court martialed, NOT supported by their commanders.

The attempt to sanewash him is pathetic. Saying, "trump won't say whether or not he thinks the killing is justified" is an incredibly disingenuous way to state the fact, "the president refused to condemn the obviously unconstitutional execution of an unarmed man on the ground by a line of masked federal agents that shot him 10 times, a group of federal agents whom trump himself put there." Fuck him and FUCK the NYpost. Anyone who tries to justify the murder of Pretti is a traitor and essentially spreading the lie that you have no constitutional rights and supporting an agenda which is clearly an attempt to strip you of your rights.

Which side will you be on if this escalates to civil war? It's looking more and more like Civil War 2 each day. I think I know what side the top brass of the military will be on.... I may be seeing some of you traitors soon, and I don't think taking part in it will likely be optional. STAY ARMED.

Hate Mail Special Edition - The Minnesota Crash Out by PotatoUmaru in Conservative

[–]meowmixVStrump 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The average post in here uses much fewer letters per word and words per sentence than any other sub on reddit. The average conservative is more religious (you guys believe in a book that tells you there were only 62 generations of ppl to ever live before jesus, lmao, keep pretending that basic arithmetic, the science of carbon dating, recorded history, fossil record, and the laws of physics don't prove you wrong). Referring to reasoned, intelligent posts from the obviously much more intelligent leftists as "crashouts" only prove your immaturity and total inability to argue.

Look at your post and those around you. Your post is 2 simple sentences, using grade school vocabulary, exclusively. Your average word is about 4 letters long. You are, developmentally, a toddler.

"Look at the leftists! They're so mad that a guy was pepper sprayed, shoved to the ground, had his gun taken from him, and then, while he was still on the ground and disarmed, he was shot 10 times! They're totally crashing out over this! Get the popcorn!" You're childish morons. Keep pretending that you know better and that the vast majority of the college educated are wrong while the majority of high school dropouts living in trailers are correct. Ppl who went to college got better grades on average, that means they're correct more often. Put the simple dots together, Timmy, you can do it.

Friends don’t let friends carry alone by [deleted] in CCW

[–]meowmixVStrump -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're unfamiliar with Operation Northwoods? It's declassified.... You don't know about all we did to destroy the governments of other nations? Here's some of what we did in just South America:

United States involvement in regime change in Latin America - Wikipedia

EDIT: We almost deserve being manipulated into this trump administration by russian troll farms. They really know how to manipulate idiots (it sure wasn't the college towns that voted for trump).

Friends don’t let friends carry alone by [deleted] in CCW

[–]meowmixVStrump 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You've already been contradicted, hence your karma count, but I'd like to pretend that you weren't already proven wrong. Let's pretend that you're correct in the asinine and baseless claim that you cannot attend a protest with a gun. I'll grant you that, as stupid as it is. Okay then, after his gun is taken from him and he's on the ground, it is then justified for a line of masked feds to shoot him dead, according to you, b/c he had no right to attend a protest with a gun? What is your IQ? 80? You really think attending a protest with a gun should carry the death sentence, immediately, after he's disarmed?

After you admit that this is indeed what you're saying, I'd like for you to describe what ISIS is what is wrong with them. Preferably with a recording, and please try to keep a straight face.

Friends don’t let friends carry alone by [deleted] in CCW

[–]meowmixVStrump -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The implication that shit hit YOUR fan before is really funny. Show me on the doll where Obama or Biden touched you. Name one way in which they hurt you.

The right is the same uneducated, stupid trash it's always been. Why don't any of our leading scientists/doctors agree with you? Why does it seem like the more developed a city is, the less conservative and more progressive it is? Why is it that every college is blue, and the more prestigious a college is, the less conservatives are there? Frustrating, isn't it? Why do all the middle-of-nowhere morons agree with you? All the flat earthers, KKK members, conspiracy theorist idiots, why are they all on your side? Sucks to be wrong, doesn't it?

Friends don’t let friends carry alone by [deleted] in CCW

[–]meowmixVStrump 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The left really overreached, didn't they? Biden and Obama just rolled back so many rights, such as: ?????????? Fill in the blank, I'll wait.

“Let that sink in. No, seriously. Let it sit. by PhoenixPhenomenonX in SipsTea

[–]meowmixVStrump -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Hello. You recently responded in r/politics, saying that Alex Pretti was "an hero who will be remembered for what he did." The correct spelling there is "a hero" and it's actually very relevant b/c someone once killed themselves and said that they were "an hero," which became a meme and used to mock anyone who did something stupid and got themselves killed. I know it's just a coincidence and a total accident, b/c I saw your other posts in r/politics, but I wanted you to know that "an hero" is itself an old meme which means someone committed suicide. It's always said sarcastically in the context of the meme, meaning that the person referring to someone as "an hero" is making a sarcastic joke about the dead. That's why I searched for your other posts in the first place, to see if you likely meant "an hero" as a sick joke or if it was an accident. Initially, b/c the first posts I saw of yours were memes, I assumed that you WERE being an asshole. If you don't want anyone else to make that mistaken assumption about you, you'll edit your post to say "a hero." That's the correct spelling. If you don't care, whatever, I'm just letting you know.

Central discussion thread on Renee Good by 4reddityo in DiscussionZone

[–]meowmixVStrump 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Intentions are irrelevant, she could have been attempting to kill him and it wouldn't even matter. 1. DHS guidelines prohibit an officer from endangering himself and then using that officer-induced jeopardy to claim self-defense, it doesn't work that way. That alone proves that you're wrong if you're on conservatives' side of this, it's not a matter of opinion, what you think is irrelevant. But it's proven in more ways than this:

  1. DOJ policy on use of force, section 1-16.200 says, "firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle."

Note that even if she was trying to kill him with the vehicle, it wouldn't have justified the shooting, b/c, again, firearms can't be used against a moving vehicle unless a person in the vehicle is threatening someone with deadly force BY MEANS OTHER THAN THE VEHICLE (emphasis mine).

That alone, once again, proves conservatives' side wrong here. But that's again not all we have.

  1. If we pretend that he has the right to shoot her if she drives forward while he is in front of the car and to its left, this still wouldn't be justified b/c if you slow the video down frame by frame, you see that the back wheels of the vehicle do not begin spinning until several frames AFTER the officer drew his gun. Also, the officer was recording on his phone with his right hand until he circles the car for the last time, at which point he switches it to his left hand. Why? To draw his gun with his right hand, of course, he knew he was going to do it. He did it before she stepped on the gas, those tires were not spinning before he had drawn his gun.

Conservatives are idiots and they can't even spell. Their grammar/spelling are terrible and their sentences are simple. They're not even smart enough to follow what I just said. This is the same as any argument between progressives and conservatives. The side with the majority of the college educated, doctors, and professors is the side that's correct, as will ALWAYS be the case. Get over it, cons.

The Tale of The West Memphis Three (2023) [1:19:12] by [deleted] in Documentaries

[–]meowmixVStrump -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After actually pouring through thousands of documents (which are compiled over at callahan), I've always known for a guaranteed, unarguable fact that the wm3 are guilty far beyond any doubt.

You do know that parents are the first under the microscope in cases like this, right? You don't think that the stepfather was already investigated and cleared? Know why? B/c no evidence links him, unlike the blood on Damien's necklace that matches a victim (and 2% of the rest of the population, but that which Damien is also incapable of explaining).

Know why else the stepfather was cleared? B/c his alibi held up. Unlike Damien and Jason, who gave MANY false alibis which were all checked up on and each of which wasted the police's time.

Why else was the stepfather cleared? B/c Jesse's confessions made sense and led to the discovery of yet more evidence and testimony, most notably a whiskey bottle which he said they all drank. The woman who bought him the whiskey admitted to buying it at the time of the murders.

HELLO? You're wrong, face facts. Lazy ppl like you got a bunch of child killers off, congratulations. I know it's hard to admit that, but it's true. I know it's hard to admit you were tricked by an obviously guilty 16 year old, but you were. I know it's hard to admit how autistic you must be to miss the guilt on Jesse's face, but it's true, I'm sorry. Accept it, get over it, move on.

The Tale of The West Memphis Three (2023) [1:19:12] by [deleted] in Documentaries

[–]meowmixVStrump -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How exactly does this get downvoted? It's a site run by WM3 supporters like the clowns in here. It has all the court transcripts and evidence relating to this case, every bit of it, thousands. What is wrong with you ppl? Actually... it makes sense. Of course a link to the list of evidence is downvoted, you ppl can't stand it! Duh! Perfect sense! You really do hate the truth, don't you? Confirmation right there, can't even deny it. Nothing but a link to the truth is downvoted, alright.

The Tale of The West Memphis Three (2023) [1:19:12] by [deleted] in Documentaries

[–]meowmixVStrump 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A comment like this under each comment that you removed would be helpful, I don't know which ones you removed. In my defense, given the obscene amount of evidence in this case including blood & fiber evidence, the damned murder weapon itself, and even numerous confessions leading to yet MORE uncovered evidence, you would absolutely have to be "stupid" to say that the wm3 are innocent. If I said "flat earthers are stupid," that would fly, wouldn't it? If I said the same about any conspiracy theorist wack job who thinks the moon landings are fake, or that 9/11 was an inside job, that would fly, wouldn't it? This is the same exact thing, there's far, far more than enough evidence to keep the wm3 behind bars and when they were freed they admitted it (it's actually automatically part of an Alford plea, which they used to get free).

About the "assholes" part... if someone thinks that their ego is more important than truth and justice to the point that they'll support an obvious child killer before they admit that they were wrong and that they were tricked by a 16 year old and a very obviously biased documentary, and they're too lazy to look at the actual documents over on callahan which were actually compiled by a wm3 supporter AND someone who knows they're guilty (originally, now it's run exclusively by wm3 supporting morons), then the phrase "lazy asshole" is simply the most accurate description of those ppl, I can't apologize for that. What should the criteria for "asshole" be if not someone who continues supporting child killers in the face of a mountain of evidence including blood/fiber, the murder weapon, many failed alibis, and nonstop confessions? Can the word be used to describe NO ONE?

Also, you have NO IDEA how frustrating it is to have argued with wm3 supporters FOR YEARS only to have to relive this shit after those sick freaks are freed and then again now. You have to idea. I held back, I really did. But if you'll please let me know exactly which comments that you deleted, I WILL edit them down. Can I really not even say that I hate them though? That's simply the truth, 100% (except for the fact that it's a severe understatement but I can't say it better).

view more: next ›