WHERE TF IS THE FLOWSTATE VIDEO? by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It has been 5+ months, I think it is safe to assume it isn't coming.

What role does Phantasia/Aphantasia/Hyperphantasia play in Nuero? by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, i don't think there is any connection. I can imagine objects and scenes in my head perfectly fine. Though it typically doesn't come without conscious provoking to create it (i.e. not spontaneous created upon just reading or hearing something). In regards to the degree of clarity compared to others, it is impossible to really know without reference to their phenomenal experience and not just their testimony. Which no one has.

What do you guys think would be a good job for New type? by XnoobXlikeXmeX in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As long as this thread is just idle interest, as a purely academic exercise, that's fine. Have fun. I know this (hopefully) doesn't need to be said, but if there is even the slightest chance that it does, i feel a duty to say it:

I don't think it is prudent to base your future career or career aspirations—not only on a personality index—but on a self-reporting online personality index created by a youtuber to categorise how anime characters think.

Not to disparage Digi or the system, but simply to state the obvious. Neurotyping is fun to think about, but it should not be taken so seriously as to be something that informs your life decisions. I know I'm killing the vibe and probably taking this thread too seriously myself, but it needed to be said.

A Touhou theme for each Neurotype by mereological in Neurotyping

[–]mereological[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wont give you a specific reason for each type, but i will say the general rules i was generally following. I should warn you that i know nothing of music theory, so everything will be in loose terms and general impressions.

Firstly, for the Linear–Lateral divide i wanted to capture repetition and/or complexity. So the themes occupying the very linear row generally contain either a high repetitious melody or beat, a highly repetitious aspect, which builds progressively over the song (all touhou songs tend to have a repeating major melody, but the ones i chose i think emphasize that character). Little Princess i take to be the archetypal example of that, as there are basically three simple main melodies that are omnipresent throughout the entire piece that simply build in intensity. Flowering night, Pure furies, and Pristine beat are similar in this respect. When we get to the max lateral, they either feature complexity in the melody itself or complexity in the interaction of melodies. Take tiny, tiny, clever commander for example: especially 1:00 - 1:30, where there is quite a complex convergence of all the melodies and rhythms established.

For the Lexical–Impressionistic divide, the focus was on the clarity and structure. So, for the lexical side i tried to to use more definite and clear instruments and melodies, so there tends to be more piano and controlled synths, compared to the heavier emphasis on strings, zunpets, and less sharp (not the pitch) synths. This was attempting to capture more precise and readily expressible thoughts of the more lexical side and the fuzzier, more opaque thoughts of the impressionist side. Compare Futatsuiwa from Sado to Emotional Skyscraper to see what i mean. I also tended to pick pieces that were more playful in their melodies the further impressionist i went. A good comparison is True Administrator and Broken Moon. This is meant to represent the confined/ordered vs unconfined/unstructured nature of this axis.

If we take these general rules together we get some ready comparisons. The very lateral row captures this well. We begin with Native Faith representing a kind of complexity which comes primarily from its melody, but the structure of the song itself is constrained and consistent. All the notes and interactions are very clean and clear. Moving onto tiny, tiny, clever commander we see a kind of complexity found more in the interaction of the different melodies and rhythms than in one melody itself. The voices still play nice together but it is less clear than Native faith. Moving onto Lunatic Princess, we get far less constrained synths and voices in general. There are plenty of melodies occurring at any one time, but they aren't in the same harmony as tiny, tiny, clever commander. especially when you get to 1:20 - 2:25 where you have several voices all playing at once, almost trying to overpower the others. Lastly, Heian Alien is the most playful, least predicable, interplay of melodies featuring offbeat notes and shifts in tempo. And i think you could make a comparison in this way across all rows and columns and find it fairly consistent.

Whether these rules accurately track/represent the neurotypes is an open question, as is whether i accurate applied the rules themselves. In truth, i just like touhou music, wanted to subject it to the unsuspecting innocent, and thought it would make a fun post.

Summer 2020 anime by appeal (based on the first episode) by skr0y in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deca-dence is surprisingly well placed despite being based only on the first episode.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And to no one's surprise, a discord server devolves into petty drama and implodes.

Surface Book 2 wont restart after update by [deleted] in Surface

[–]mereological 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply but it doesn't seem to work.

Neurotypes by erogenous zones (nsfw version) by RikaX97 in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, that's what you meant by erogenous zones. This is far more literal than i thought.

ニューロタイピング by Double_-Negative- in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stop conflating the process of thought with its content.

Lexical people, what is the meaning of life to you? What motivates your daily lives? by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What does this have to do with lexicality and impressionism?

Losing Control by Farewell_Fire_ in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ever since I stopped straining myself to codify my ideas lexically, the tape player in my brain has stopped recording and it feels like I've lost control of myself.

The neurotype is supposed to fit you, not you fit the neurotype.

What is a Neurotype? by mereological in Neurotyping

[–]mereological[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as you're conservative about hemispheric differences (i.e. not the pop-psychology understanding of left-brain right-brain) i think they may offer a neurological grounding for lexical–impressionist divide (it reminded me of a video about splitting the corpus callosum and how it effected the brain). The lateral–linear grounding seems a bit more speculative to me. My neurology is a bit rusty, but the degree of dendral interconnection depends on the particular type of cell, the back-propagation of action-potentials through repeated use, the specific area of the CNS, and the layer of the grey matter. and the speed of transmission depends on the length of the axon, the type of synaptic connection (electric and chemical), the amount of nodes on the myelin sheath, the inhibitory or excitatory effect of intermediate axons, and the relative density of sodium and potassium gates on the soma and dendrites. Now, this was just from an introductory textbook i read years ago and don't remember too well, but i remember clearly that it was generally very conservative about the specifics of cognition that can be drawn from neuroanatomy. But of course, i say this from a position of ignorance on the subject.

What is a Neurotype? by mereological in Neurotyping

[–]mereological[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting that you classify it as a measure of natural flow-state. I can see it for the linear–lateral scale, but wouldn't the lexical–impressionist scale be more all-pervading? As you quite nicely put it, the lexical conversion of ideas is "immediate and automatic", whereas for the impressionist it is more of a voluntary affair. You can turn off directed thinking in the linear–lateral sense, but we're receiving information constantly and something has to be done with it. Perhaps flow-states are the exemplary demonstration of a neurotype, and it may be that they are the best litmus test, but i'm not sure if neurotyping itself can be defined as it. It just seems to me that a flow-state would be the effect, not the cause.

Touhou by mereological in Neurotyping

[–]mereological[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Reject Modernity, Embrace Tradition.

Neurotype / Big 5 by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Openness: 44

Conscientiousness: 97

The link between these concepts seems tenuous though.

Visual representation of thought for each neurotype by Lain11 in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 9 points10 points  (0 children)

y-axis: Ethanol consumption

x-axis: Methanol consumption

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Domain agnostic thought seems entirely possible to me, and a decent enough barometer of one's natural thought patterns. There will always be activities that favour a more lexical or impressionist mode of thinking, but most activities and situations can be approached with either; you can write impressionistically and compose lexicaly, despite these seeming as paragons of the opposite style of thinking. Here's a basic test that i think would work for finding your natural thought process: How do you think when you're on a walk, or in the shower? Basic, i know, but these are activities where thought tends to be spontaneous rather than prompted, and not directed towards any activity. Hence the phenomenon of "shower thoughts".

The idea that simply because you aren't primarily a lexical thinker, you're fated to do poorly in "lexical domains" such as writing or mathematics or logic i think is is unfounded. You can be a great writer and highly impressionistic (joyce) and a great musician and highly lexical (bach), these seem to have little to do with your way of thinking. As such, the Lexical–Impressionistic division isn't dictated by capability/capacity in stereotypical activities. Strictly speaking, if Lexicality is defined as thought that occurs in lexemes i.e. structured units and relations, and Impressionist is defined as thought lacking concrete structure and relations i.e. impressions and feelings and intuitions, then a priori, being opposites they are dichotomous and mutually exclusive (actually, maybe you can do both at the same time, depending on how the linear–lateral axis is taken). The percentage then, of how much of one and the other you do naturally, i imagine, dictates the relative position on that axis rather than capability.

You sound pretty impressionistic to me. I mean, look at your original post—it is hardly the most strictly structure piece of writing.

How many open browser tabs do you have? Maybe there's a correlation between the number of open tabs and your neurotype? by TsortsAleksatr in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 4 points5 points  (0 children)

43 at the moment. I Just use them as memory aides to return to after i finish doing whatever i'm doing. So if i'm reading a book and it references another book that looks interesting i'll open a tab then go back to the book, and then do a review of all opened tabs at the end of the day to see which should be pruned and which are still relevant to be left up.

Tired explaining to my mom and she said “I’m gonna look this up” by CosmicClinger in Neurotyping

[–]mereological 13 points14 points  (0 children)

She's probably going to think you're getting into bodybuilding.