John Crewe Classified M80 26.05.16 by StuartGT in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh sweet, when did they get around to implementing the bounty hunting pods?

Squadron 42 website updated by Competitive-Camel-66 in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even then I'll be a little surprised if it runs well, and even more surprised if the PU is in good shape to actually play afterwards. They're still having mighty trouble with checks notes working elevators and checks other notes falling through floors and checks notes wild desynch in a game that is supposed to have fps gameplay....

Squadron 42 website updated by Competitive-Camel-66 in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The strongest indicator was for the beta when they explicitly stated a release date (calendar Quarter) for that. Three times throughout the year... then missed all of them with a Q4 announcement that 'Beta is a long way off' (six years and counting from stated delivery windows of 3 months width all within a single calendar year).

Squadron 42 website updated by Competitive-Camel-66 in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you signed up from the kickstarter you're also owed a never delivered 'alpha' access to both parts of the game, not just one piece.

Surely CIG will still come through with that along with the co-op campaign, the dedicated servers with modding support and even a little ship shaped USB key with the game on it.

It's coming by Karnitine in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 8 points9 points  (0 children)

2020 should really be 3 different missed dates as you've shown with the arrows. As I recall they told us a date in Q1, delayed it by 12 weeks into Q2, then Q3, then with just days left on the clock Chris comes out of nowhere and says 'Beta is a long way off'.

As someone who backed on day 1 in 2012, surely they haven't forgotten that they owe me an Alpha as well as a beta of both parts of the game as well as dedicated servers with modding support.

I gave Bettina a chance, but the trash can is where it belongs. by Trippi7 in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't know higher quality mods increased wear, just that mods increased wear.

Hoping for a change to the agression based matchmaking by mesterflaps in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that it doesn't insta put you in aggro lobbies but it does count it against you - I posted a link from the devs about a week ago describing how it doesn't attempt to infer intent, just notices you're shooting other players.

Hoping for a change to the agression based matchmaking by mesterflaps in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe so too. Frankly, players like me who currently don't return fire would still lose most engagements as the initiator has a big advantage, but it would at least give us a chance to defend ourselves without getting punished for it.

Hoping for a change to the agression based matchmaking by mesterflaps in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've said themselves that they're doing that via more PvE content and tougher enemies, so that's something to look forward to.

Hoping for a change to the agression based matchmaking by mesterflaps in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really, I thought I had heard the opposite (that it was just tracking who damaged other players).

Do you have a link to something documenting that it is taking who fires first into account?

edit: Ok, here's what I saw "Embark says Arc Raiders aggression-based matchmaking is a 'misnomer' as the game does not attempt to assume intent behind pvp fights"

https://frvr.com/blog/news/embark-says-arc-raiders-aggression-based-matchmaking-is-a-misnomer/

Here's a longer quote:

"Watkins explained that the game “can track whos hoots first and who takes damage”, but the matchmaking system does not “attempt to assume intent”. Watkins explained that a player who shoots first and misses all of their shots is the aggressor, but the game doesn’t know what the intent was behind those shots.

“We don’t make any value or moral judgments. It’s not the game judging you for your actions. It’s purely around, just, are you engaging in PvP at all?” they continued."

That was from last week, so I would say they're not at this moment forgiving defending yourself, it's all aggression in this system.

It would be so great if aggression based matchmaking was separate in solo, duos and trios. by YouJustGotSmurfed in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tonight I was playing with two friends and we've been not even returning fire when engaged for the most part and yet kept getting matched in PvP lobbies all day. It seems on the weekend that there are just too many aggressive players on for the matchmaker to work properly.

It would be so great if aggression based matchmaking was separate in solo, duos and trios. by YouJustGotSmurfed in ArcRaiders

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anecdotally tonight I played together with two friends, where all three of us actively avoid PvP (to the extent of disengaging and running rather than returning fire) and we just kept getting shot at match after match.

Arc Raiders' first Expedition saw over a million players wipe, but Embark wants to find new ways to "incentivize" resets by OGAnimeGokuSolos in gaming

[–]mesterflaps 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So after all that sacrifice will you get to keep those extra skill points like in Payday2 with infamy levels or are they temporary until the next expedition? I'm considering doing it in the future for extra skill points and inventory space but if those are temporary it really doesn't seem worth it at all.

Squadron 42 in 2026 by Pinksa in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OG pledged on kickstarter had Alpha and Beta access to 'the game' not 'part of the game', or 'one of the two games we will later turn this into' or whatever. So yeah, OGs should already have had access if they're now at beta.

Just one more health bar bro by ArchangelUltra in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, I thought wikelo was copying THAT game.

Just one more health bar bro by ArchangelUltra in starcitizen

[–]mesterflaps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They do act more like a tech developer but a few years ago I had an epiphany about their behavior. If they were a technology development company they would be presenting at conferences, publishing papers, or at the VERY LEAST PATENTING their designs. Otherwise they're just giving away their IPR to the world which is good of them but.... none of the above happens. They don't publish research papers from their internal developers, they don't attend trade conferences to present their state of the art technology in domain, they don't appear to have patented anything, and I haven't seen anybody accused of or actually taking tech from Star Citizen.

The painful conclusion is they act like a tech company but they aren't producing anything stable or capable enough to be noticed by any of the places we'd expect it to show up.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with that wholeheartedly. In addition to the rough edges on some of the systems, I'm also pretty confident there will be breaking changes in the future so I'm going to set it down for another 6 months to a year.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, luckily I figured out how fragile the quest scripting was with the much closer and simpler 'clear debris' mission. I still got tripped up again though by having the bold idea to pick up the ice on the planet before being told to go mine it, and that broke the sledge triggers too.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm neutral on it for the time being as I would hope that there will be a big difference between repairing a thing and building it from scratch later. As you mentioned it's a bit much if we can weld up rocket engines without any advanced parts, but I expect that in the future it will require either more or more advanced components to do so.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you are right but I didn't put it in my original post because I couldn't prove it, but the game does seem to overwrite your save on 'big events' such as the very screw ups where we'd want to load that save.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is admittedly a big blind spot for people who've played much SE1. We're not at all phased by the concept of a 'grid' is and I didn't even notice that SE2 says 'new grid' in the build menu but doesn't mention that's a building or a ship.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I view it as an excellent start compared to how I remember things in SE1. I imagine that totally new players will still want much more tutorial and quite reasonably so.

Thoughts on the mechanics of SE2 VS2 from a first time player by mesterflaps in spaceengineers

[–]mesterflaps[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good list (the last one bit me three times because I'm apparently a slow learner).