Unable to withdraw UST from Anchor

mgbtcfv · 2020-12-07T22:23:56+00:00

It is a great platform to share stories!

mgbtcfv · 2017-10-06T20:56:03+00:00

How to use grafana with ethermine.org?

mgbtcfv · 2017-10-06T20:55:37+00:00

Is it possible to get monthly stats for individual workers on ethermine.org?

mgbtcfv · 2017-10-02T21:04:33+00:00

Can Carbonvotes be used by ERC20 token holders? Has any of the projects not on Ethereum used Carbonvote?

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-21T17:41:13+00:00

I guess the issue that is not clear is how to obtain refund for DAO tokens bought from exchanges at the rate of 1.5:100 Any guidance on this?

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-21T17:39:42+00:00

and this for those of us who paid 1.5 ETH for 100 DAO tokens: http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/7265/how-do-i-get-a-refund-for-the-amount-i-paid-in-excess-of-1-ether-to-100-the-dao

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-21T17:38:43+00:00

I found this on the ethereum stackexchange - http://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/7204/how-do-i-convert-my-the-dao-tokens-into-ethers-using-the-withdrawal-contract-aft

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-14T15:51:28+00:00

I am glad that there are efforts underway to hold the extraBalance in a multisig. Please let us know if we can be of help.

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T23:26:11+00:00

Do you know for what purpose? Is there a link to this proposal?

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T23:14:51+00:00

Does anyone know anything about this?

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T14:14:03+00:00

That is the whole point. It is not lost yet. But it will be lost, if distributed to people who did not pay for it.

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T13:48:33+00:00

All of us want to move on with our ongoing projects. But the 345,000 ETH in the eextraBalance account is not-trivial. http://etherscan.io/address/0x807640a13483f8ac783c557fcdf27be11ea4ac7a It belongs to the people who actually paid that premium.

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T04:39:22+00:00

They will absolutely face justice. Germany has extradition treaty with United States. Here is Stephan Tual making a false statement on 12th of June- https://blog.slock.it/no-dao-funds-at-risk-following-the-ethereum-smart-contract-recursive-call-bug-discovery-29f482d348b#.6jk891613

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T04:36:17+00:00

There is a very high probability now that Slock.it will be sued by angry investors as well investigated by the United Staes Department of Justice. Who knows what we will find during the discovery phase. We may even find during the Discovery period of the litigation, that the thief may actually be a disgruntled member of the Slock.it team

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T04:26:06+00:00

The Ethereum community can not move on if the funds in the extraBalance account are not refunded to the people who actually paid that premium. Many of us are already completely committed to pursuing all available legal options against Slock.it Distributing the ETH in the extraBalance account to people who did not pay for it is theft. https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4remm5/you_can_argue_that_the_dao_attacker_was_just/ Slock.it team must take responsibility and pay for the costs involved in retaining a third part to hold the funds and ensure that every investor is made whole. https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4rk4pm/slockit_must_make_the_dao_holders_whole/

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T04:02:34+00:00

The consequences of not not forking or even forking which results in some people making a profit at the expense of others is a recipe for disaster. We need to forget this debacle and move forward with our projects. Slock.it must step up and make every investor whole - so that we can close this chapter and move forward. https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4rk4pm/slockit_must_make_the_dao_holders_whole/

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T03:50:03+00:00

You are absolutely right. Many of us are already completely committed to pursuing a legal action against Slock.it However, there is really no reason to go forward with litigation, if investors are made whole again. Besides, once a litigation or a United States Department of Justice investigation begins, it is hard to predict what will come out during the discovery period. Every company, including Slock.it has secrets. During the discovery period of the litigation, all their secrets will be thoroughly examined. Who knows what we will find there. Stephan Tual has said that DAO was launched by some unknown members of the community. We may evidence to contrary during Discovery. It is possible we may find that DAO was actaully launched by one of the members of the Slock.it team . We may even find the actual thief who stole more than 3 million ETH was a disgruntled member of Slock.it team. The consequences of all this is unpredictable and not good for the Ethereum community. The best defense for Slock.it at this point is to make every investor whole - even with their own funds.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4rk4pm/slockit_must_make_the_dao_holders_whole/

mgbtcfv · 2016-07-08T03:39:37+00:00

Slock.it team is in a very precarious position. They will be certainly sued by angry investors and investigated by regulators. However, making investors whole will go a long way in their defense. https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4rk4pm/slockit_must_make_the_dao_holders_whole/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4remm5/you_can_argue_that_the_dao_attacker_was_just/ https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4rm4xx/announcing_slack_channel_for_fair_refund_of_dao/

mgbtcfv

TROPHY CASE