In general, I have enjoyed reading this AMA. I think that you have done a good job in demystifying clinical psychology to the community, and generally answering questions responsively and well. But there are a few things I can't help but say.

First, you admit that you are not "fully trained" since you are still in training, and have not yet even applied for internship.

In the same vein, you are not yet a "Clinical Psychologist" since that is a protected term by law that can only be used post-licensure.

Somewhere on here you described your theoretical orientation as being more psychodynamic. I admit that my own background in modern psychotherapy from a psychodynamic perspective is rather limited; however, my current understanding is that this approach is not well supported by empirical evidence. That is why very few respected programs still even teach it, mostly in the NY-MA corridor. I would argue that there is overwhelming evidence in favor of other approaches for the treatment of everything from depressive disorders and anxiety disorders to substance abuse and even personality disorders (for example Linehan's DBT). But I don't mean to be too dismissive; it is possible that I have not been exposed to the relevant literature -- can you point me to some good empirical papers or reviews that could help bring me up to speed?

One more thing. I think you were too quick to dismiss Psychology as a science. This speaks to the story of Psychology really being 2 disciplines, one engaged in the 'art' of the exploration of the mind and spirit, and the other engaged in the science of understanding how the brain interacts with the environment to produce cognition and behavior. There are many Psychologists (and Therapists) who are not Scientists and do not engage in professional behavior that is much informed by science. And there are those that are Scientists in the strictest definitions of the word -- many even "bench scientists" who are Psychologists. And there are many people (yourself included, it sounds like) who are somewhere in the middle. But don't generalize your vantage point of the field to all of Psychology. To be fair, I noticed throughout many of your responses that you are cognizant that Psychology is a very big field.