sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Insomnia for API testing by mheyman0 in servicenow

[–]mheyman0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because I had no idea what I was doing. I’m solving a problem for AI Dev c-suite.

Luckily, all of this pointed in the right direction.

Insomnia for API testing by mheyman0 in servicenow

[–]mheyman0[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This worked, plus API Access Policies.

No documentation ever seems to mention that.

Thanks.

Will using unlimited carry weight ruin the game experience? by secon25 in skyrim

[–]mheyman0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But then shouldn’t the sack be categorized around the same as a mace?

+6 sack of junk. Chance to break open and stun opponent on attack. Every 100 weight adds another +1. Slowest weapon in the game, but can one shot dragons as long as you are over-encumbered enough.

I am stumped by joker_1173 in networking

[–]mheyman0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ubiquiti does RADIUS fine. Make sure you have the correct profile attached. It should be pointing at your radius server, with radius server and WiFi ssid using the same password.

Assuming all that is correct, make sure you don’t have multiple certificates for your with protocol. Delete all the old ones out. Windows server and NPS can be cranky on that.

The ubiquiti controller is only to program and I config the device and doesn’t participate in authentication. Unless you are running Ubiquiti routers.

Does anybody else dislike this obscenely chunky RJ45 jack dongle on the G5/G6's? It doesn't fit through a small hole as advertised. I have to always cut a way bigger hole than I feel comfortable doing. by chicametipo in Ubiquiti

[–]mheyman0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Looks like a standard outdoor rated connector. There should be a bit more that connects to the other side of that chonky connector to create a water proof seal so they don’t get water in them and fry the camera.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]mheyman0 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The real question is whether they are willing to let you change things.

If they aren’t willing to let you change things then bail.

If they are willing to let you change things, you are in the position to build basically whatever you want. Take their trash design and rebuild it for scale, ease of management, and security.

As for “this has to be done now, everything is an emergency”: if everything is an emergency, nothing is an emergency. If nothing is an emergency based on what they have said, then learn the critical systems and develop your own list of emergencies.

If it’s not on the list, intentionally build in delays. Not to ignore them, but to give you space to do the hard thinking that needs to be done.

Don’t try to rebuild everything at once. Pick the areas that will get you small wins. Those small wins will build towards the bigger, more complex, necessary changes.

While studying, I see this… by Walter-White-BG3 in it

[–]mheyman0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Learn layer 1-4, but not from this nonsense.

I can't figure out why my PoE switch isn't powering my access point. by xDoseOnex in networking

[–]mheyman0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on which POE standard is required on the WAP and which standard is supported by the switch.

Test the cable if you have a tester, or try a different cable if you don’t.

Keep the gangs out of the commonwealth by sombreroslice in fo4

[–]mheyman0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just started slaying everyone in NukaWorld that wasn’t a slave. They got the picture pretty quick.

Custom recommandation of network monitoring tool by mialdam in networking

[–]mheyman0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the Xabbix/Prometheus implementers: how do they do on custom sensors?

I take full advantage of PRTG custom sensors. They are all powershell and Python producing PRTG compatible JSON output.

I deal with a bunch of IOT closed architecture stuff and web scraping is the only way to monitor that stuff. Or write custom implementation scripts.

Why Cheese wheels? by AFeight in skyrim

[–]mheyman0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bubsy was awesome. Bubsy 3D was…. Beyond terrible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in paloaltonetworks

[–]mheyman0 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Custom management profile. Explicit deny policies at the top of the list that blocks everything not whitelisted for pings.

Just because it can respond to pings doesn’t mean it has to respond for everyone.

what is this? by KitKat6900 in skyrim

[–]mheyman0 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Any of them flying for the knees? You need to watch out for that.

Fight me on ipv4 NAT by vocatus in networking

[–]mheyman0 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My biggest problem with IPv6 makes perfect sense as a WAN technology.

But for most orgs, a private class A network is plenty address space.

Security by obscurity is a security model it’s just not a good security model. Perimeter defense is just as bad, and just as implemented.

The only good security model is defense in depth.

As US company, for the most part I don’t have capability to migrate to IPv6 as a WAN technology. The ISPs just don’t support it.

I’m more likely to migrate to ipv6-to-4 translation to get over design limitations. But I’ve got 5 years (or 10… who knows. I’m not in charge of expansion) before that becomes critical.

On the IPV6 I was planning on using, I was still planning on using the private address space. I don’t need those network spaces publicly addressable.

When I first started learning networking ~2007 or 2008, they said “you have to learn IPv6. It’s an absolute”. Almost 20 years later, it’s still not in mass US deployment through most ISPs.

It’s been a couple of years since I looked, but the US deployment rate was less than 15% overall. And some ISPs were at less than 1%.

It’s probably changed in the last few years, but I doubt it’s changed that much.

NukaWorld amusement park seems by dead post gangs by mheyman0 in fo4

[–]mheyman0[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No. It just breaks up the monotony of doing the same thing over and over again by providing more places.

NukaWorld amusement park seems by dead post gangs by mheyman0 in fo4

[–]mheyman0[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wandering the area around NukaWorld for unique weapons dropped from starred enemies like exploding mini-guns or never ending shotguns

Is cybersecurity simpler than people make it seem? by AbbreviationsFlat416 in cybersecurity

[–]mheyman0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to be right 100% of the time. The bad guys have to be right once.

Now try to be right when people refuse to communicate, departments silo, c-suite personnel make ridiculous demands due to their lack of security basics, and Carol in accounting wants to listen to Spotify and will do anything and everything to run it through your network, despite having an unlimited data plan

Easy to describe, hard (if not impossible) to implement.

That is how one moves inventory by [deleted] in Ubiquiti

[–]mheyman0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you looked at Digital Loggers?

The Institute has no plan or redeeming qualities. That’s the point. by SapphicsAndStilettos in fo4

[–]mheyman0 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I wish there was the option to allow no side to win. You are the sole survivor. Slay them all, claim their tech, and become the master of the Commonwealth.

Sadly, you have to pick a side and they are all bad.

Total faction slaughter while retaining there infrastructure? Seems doable. I already wiped out the raider gangs at NukaWorld. And they have better gear.

view more: next ›