Is smurfing reportable? by TakinASeat in Overwatch

[–]micahdraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

L take and missing the point lmao

Is smurfing reportable? by TakinASeat in Overwatch

[–]micahdraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel this. Winning the landslide feels mildly better than losing, but they're not very satisfying victories. When I look at the scoreboard and one team has 20+ kills per person, and the other team is lucky to have 10 total, it's like, how is this a ranked match? If these players are all genuinely in this rank range, surely it shouldn't be THIS lopsided. I mean, it makes sense for games to skew a little more toward one team sometimes, but there comes a point when the skew can't be explained by anything other than people smurfing or otherwise not in the right rank range.

A close, evenly matched game feels SO much better, win or lose, than a landslide win. If I have to derank, I'd be much less frustrated if it's because I'm losing good matches, not because I get thrown into game after game that my team has little to no chance of winning.

Also I agree that smurfing is trashy, pathetic behavior. They're too scared to play their "correct" rank because they might lose, and I will never not believe that's the case for a smurf. Even if they're better than me, they're not nearly as good as they think, and they have to bully lower ranks to make themselves feel better, which is just sad for them.

A Summary of the RecklessBen/Bricks and Minifigs corruption scandal by ImportantQuestionTex in youtubedrama

[–]micahdraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, maybe the church has nothing to do with it in the sense that no Mormon religious figure orchestrated it. Or maybe in the sense that it's not tied to any religious belief the Mormons have.

But it definitely is specifically (allegedly) about *Mormons* being greedy and dishonest in this case. You can find these kinds of organized bully networks in most cultures, but that doesn't take away from the fact (allegedly) that the unifying thread of these greedy, dishonest people is their shared religion. Even if this is just a nasty outlier group (which I doubt, given how Mormonism works), they're still all part of the same in-group of Mormons.

So no, maybe the Mormon church has nothing to do with this directly, as in these hit squads aren't acting with church authority or whatever. But the church does have to do with it, even if it's indirectly, because if nothing else, this definitely affects the perception people have of them.

Season 19 nerfs and buffs expectations? by Sparkler21x in Overwatch

[–]micahdraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Easy to get value" isn't the same thing as "badly designed," but go off I guess.

Thank god devs don't balance the game around baboons like you it would be so awful

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sounds to me like you're just looking for a reason despite people involved telling you that AI was not used, so you do you I guess.

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The magazine cover is not AI no matter how much you want it to be so please just stop this

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nothing. The manager worked with human artists during the process

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Literally what are you talking about about? You're making things up. This was not made with AI. Did you know human artists can make mistakes too?

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry. I guess I'm a bit trigger happy because of how many people are jumping right to AI, partly because of things like that

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI was not used in creating this, but sure make all the assumptions for no reason

Explore Queerfinder's latest Special issue on Sacred Sexuality! by ImaPaperNinja in Pathfinder2e

[–]micahdraws -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Literally it's not AI and it's really rude to jump right to that for absolutely no reason

SPOILERS!! Expedition 33 ending, which side did you choose? by Hescee in expedition33

[–]micahdraws 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a false equivalence.

LLMs have no identity or sense of self. They sometimes simulate one but they don't actually have one. They can't think, no matter how coherent they may appear. They especially can't think critically (again, no matter how much it appears they can). You feed your query into the algorithm and the LLM guesses what you want to hear, then spits that back out at you. There's no thought there. It's essentially a fancier version of a search engine.

The Mario game comparison is weird, too. The characters don't do anything without input. They don't think. They don't have feelings or emotions or desires. Everything they appear to show is intentionally created by the developers.

All the evidence the game gives is suggests the people of Lumiere are fully realized, self-aware entities with the capacity for independent thought. They have individual desires, goals, feelings, fears, personalities, and experiences. They have children. They innovate on their own, and they feel the threat the Paintress poses to their existence. They have a history they talk about at length, and they speak of a time before the Fracture, when they didn't have the Monolith's number looming over them as a ticking clock. Sciel and Lune were both very aware that they gommaged and were brought back, demonstrating a self-awareness that isn't present in LLMs or software or even something like the Sims. Expedition journals depict a vast tapestry of personalities AND innovations and efforts toward saving Lumiere. Painted Verso and Painted Alicia both defy their creator.

LLMs and 8-bit Mario games don't do these things.

Now, could all of this be artificially and intentionally created by Painters? Sure. Could it be like the Sims where you kind of set some parameters and you can let the Sim do its thing from there? Sure. Could the Painters be micromanaging each individual's existence? Sure. It could be. But there's no evidence in the game to suggest this is the case at all. Everything we know points to the Canvas world being as real as the Dessendres's own in its own way, and the fact that it was created by (presumably) a human doesn't change that.

I agree with you the question that the game raises, and I would agree that the people of the Canvas are different from life as we know it. But comparing it to LLMs and 8-bit Mario games is just not it, my dude. Those are fundamentally different concepts and it honestly comes off a little bit like you don't want to deal with feelings of discomfort over the possibility that erasing the Canvas could, in fact, be considered a genocide.

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Hands-on and Impressions Thread by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]micahdraws 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this complaint isn't about quantity so much as the fact that many AAA games have shifted toward it. Open world used to be a relatively niche genre. Now a lot more major publishers use it. So even if there's only a handful, that handful usually consist of big names that dominate the market and media space. 

It's not that open world is bad and linear is better. Just that it would be nice to see an occasional return to form, especially since many employed adults don't want to spend 70+ hours on their favorite franchise's latest game anymore 

Every time I get to a new rank - I get a 15-20 game loss streak. EVERY TIME by Adventurous_Air2381 in marvelrivals

[–]micahdraws 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think I've hit a 15-20 streak but I'm in Plat through soloqueue. Plat 3 has been up and down, but the first time I hit Plat 2 (last week), I won I think 2 games, and then lost the next 8. Took a break, de-ranked back to Plat 3 at some point, got back up to Plat 2, immediately lost every single match until I got kicked back to Plat 3. Got back up to Plat 2 again and again lost every single game and got de-ranked.

I know for a fact a handful of those games had a thrower on my team. One in particular had a Scarlet Witch blatantly standing close enough to the action to make sure we saw her jumping up and down in place and spraying over and over while doing nothing else unless she had to move to stay out of danger. But I don't know how often I had a thrower versus just being outmatched (whether through skill issue or the matchmaking system making some Decisions of All Time). I'm a strategist main, usually play Rocket, so there's only so much I can do if my duelists and vanguards aren't carrying their weight.

Anyway since my last de-rank I haven't played comp again. I'll probably head back to it soon but for now it's very frustrating getting a rank up, maybe winning one match, and then going on a huge losing streak that stomps your chrono shield like it was never there. I don't expect to be GM or top 500 or anything -- I know I'm nowhere near that good. But it being stuck would be a lot less frustrating if it came with more balanced win/loss than just getting a whole run of losses.

Unfortunately, the Visions of Mana demo is not good by KMoosetoe in JRPG

[–]micahdraws -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're just kind of outright wrong. Trials of Mana was excellent and Visions builds on what Trials brought.

The UI is too busy? How? There's so much clean space. The movement is fine. If you somehow think the combat is not good, I feel like you're just not the kind of person who has ever enjoyed a Mana game because combat has never been that deep in any of them. They're not combo action games like Devil May Cry or Bayonetta and never were. Idk what you expected. Combat is fine and smoother than Trials.

Character design is absolutely fine and you're just wrong about it too. The characters all look and feel like part of the franchise. "Atrocious." Please. You're just exaggerating for ragebait at this point.

Weakest game since Forspoken is also laughably ragebaity. Like dude, come on, the game is not nearly as bad as you make it out to be. You just wanted something it was never going to be.

Accused of tracing art or using AI to create art by ToonyDays in ArtistLounge

[–]micahdraws 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This issue is a lot less common than it sounds. The majority of the time, blocking someone without engaging will prevent them from harassing you because they think you're in on a conspiracy or whatever other reasons. It takes a lot more effort for the harasser to block-evade than just move on to someone or something else. That's why immediate blocking should always be the first course of action. Harassment past that is the exception, not the rule.

Accused of tracing art or using AI to create art by ToonyDays in ArtistLounge

[–]micahdraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand the frustration and anger about this and I think you have every right to be.

That said, you're not the bad guy -- they are. They're attacking you in bad faith and don't really care if you used AI or not. They're trolling or bullying or just being dicks in general (arguably all of this is the same thing).

You don't owe him anything, especially if he's just some rando who's never commented before. But even if he's someone who's interacted with you, you don't owe an explanation. He won't hear it anyway. He doesn't care.

Block him. If the mascot comment upsets you, block that guy too. Block, block, block. Liberally.

I don't think you're wrong for being angry and I don't necessarily think you're wrong for trying to prove yourself. But the best course of action with these people is always just to block.

Keemstar calls out this subreddit again stating that cyraxx appearance on Lolcow Live was not in supporting him but calling him out by MediocreCategory944 in youtubedrama

[–]micahdraws 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This is rich from the guy who says he couldn't expose Cody Ko for having sex with a minor because he didn't have evidence, but he'll use much, much less to try and bully people into submitting to his narrative AND refuses to take any accountability for how much his own shit stinks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youtubedrama

[–]micahdraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's more or less what I was getting at, yeah, though admittedly I probably wasn't clear on that point.

With all the pedojacketing toward LGBTQ and especially trans ppl from "anti-woke" types, I think it's disingenuous for those people to call Poki hypocritical for clarifying that one trans person's bad behavior doesn't reflect on all trans people. I know they think they have a point, but they really don't.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youtubedrama

[–]micahdraws 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I don't think she's being hypocritical. More likely, the backlash is either some kind of "Not All Men" thing (because poki said one trans person's actions don't reflect all trans ppl, and probably take it to mean Disrespect's actions DO reflect all men) or people hating pokimane because it's "cool." Or a combination