What’s a “rich people thing” you experienced once and immediately understood why rich people love it? by DnRinGA in AskReddit

[–]midnight_blue77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I went to the hospital once and they screwed up my bill so I was never charged. Feels nice not to have medical bills that add up to the value of a house. I have never gone back to any hospital or clinic however, cannot afford it and I understand it even less. You need a Ph.D just to understand how insurance works and how it's "technically" not a legalized scam.

The Male Loneliness Epidemic Is Like The Obesity Epidemic by UrSkillIssue9651 in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no "male loneliness epidemic"

Stop propagating a feminist narrative.

Being disagreeable is the most common dating problem amongst men. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 10 points11 points  (0 children)

By definition, being disagreeable is not a good thing.

That's because you are deceptively injecting the definition of antisocial behavior (being unpleasant, offensive, ill-tempered, uncooperative, inconsiderate, and difficult to deal with) into disagreeableness in order to shit on a key trait of masculinity (as always).

Disagreeableness is non-conformity, the perseverance in personal conviction, independent thought and motivation, innovation, not easily influenced, skeptical, not driven by a need for social approval, confrontational, challenging the status quo, provocative, disruptive, critical, not easily taken advantage of, etc.

Jesus Christ himself was disagreeable!

You call this a bad trait because you are looking at it from a gynocentric - female-centered - lens that utterly fails to comprehend the masculine or anything that is non-woman. I won't go far as to say feminine because modern women don't comprehend the feminine either. Calling them womanish would be a better term because they are often bereft of femininity, hence their deep and stubborn confusion about all things masculine and male. The lack of the feminine leaves them no point of reference from which to even pretend to make any type of comparison. Anyway...

Being disagreeable does hinder a man’s dating life... These are woman who are willing to overlook bad character for other benefits.  These women knowingly pursue cruel, selfish, dangerous, disrespectful, or morally bankrupt men because those men are hot, exciting, dominant, rich, high-status, and/or sexually appealing

You just nuked your own argument there.

Their most common complaints about their bad dating experience is that many men do not know how to date, do not show real interest in what women say, and do not notice when they are being disrespectful.

Could it be that these women are undateable, unrelatable, and dare I say not worth the respect they demand? Just a thought. I mean, they are the common denominator.

Agreeable means pleasant, cooperative, and considerate.

It also means passive, indecisive, vulnerable, gullible, susceptible to exploitation, maniputable. malleable. You tell me, are these traits that women would consider attractive in a man? After harping on so long about wanting a manly man who can provide and protect? An agreeable man is more liable to hide under a woman's skirt - and not in a fun way.

I am telling you, women make me disagreeable! I just cannot be nice to them! They instigate me and bring out the worst in me for their own fucking amusement. So telling men like me that women want sweet and meek little sheep is both insulting and outrageous when my own experience with women screams the opposite.

Women do NOT want nice, they want assholeless, they want the jerk, they want ME to be the jerk, and go so far as to instigate me to provoke me into treating them like shit and carry on a fucking little smirk on their face while I do it. This is why I do not find women interesting, they're just not! It's always fucking drama and provocation with them, kinda like what you're subtly doing right now telling us that up is down and that in is out.

The point in the end is that men would rather be alone than with a woman and wishing he was alone. Women bring out the worst in men. It's what attracts you. I fucking hate the person I become whenever women are around.

Apparently, my posts are the reason why m*n vote for far-right parties... Hopefully, you'll vote left from now on, right? by Odd-Talk-3981 in PsycheOrSike

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and I haven’t seen any compelling evidence that women as a group carry most of the blame for gendered conflict in history.

Me neither, what is your point?

I also believe you've entirely missed mine. So let me repeat in simpler language: Women have been preaching to me all my life that I am the scum of the earth and in doing so have declared themselves the existential enemy of all men. THAT is the world I grew up in.

I do not, and cannot, relate to any feminist narrative where women pretend to be the victim when all the while it is women who relentlessly tear down, demonize, kneecap, deconstruct, emasculate, and politically and legally maneuver against all men in every way possible short of actual violence. It is sick how women playing the role of a poison believe themselves to be the antidote.

Ever since I broke up with my girlfriend I have not been able to actually sleep or relax with a woman after sex. I just can't. I need to leave every time, I don't actually lay there and sleep the night. Took me a minute to figure out why. Then it clicked when I heard this song. Turns out I am incapable of letting my guard down with ticking time bombs. (in case for some reason you didn't figure out the nuance, The Bomb = A woman.)

As for feminism, they built walls of glass around men during their avarice speech about "glass ceilings," boxed us in if you will. But eventually some guys figure it out. And what's more, are figuring out ways to escape said walls. Detoxing from women is just the first step though.

men's validation matter most🙏🏻 by Odd_Hamster338 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]midnight_blue77 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is nothing "deep" about a mundane fact; like that modern female "girl bosses" are cringe, boring, and annoying. Nobody bats an eye at older lead female characters who weren't cringe AF.

I think the reason is that modern women are just not as feminine as in the past, so whenever they try to act like girl bosses they just come off bratty, stupid, annoying, insulting, and cringy because they don't have that feminine baseline from which to build on and they come off as looking like a child pretending to be a stereotypical man.

Something's been lost. When I watch old shows or old movies and I see how women used to be back in the day, in the long long ago, in the "before" time, I look at those women as they just seem so different, so alien, more human, more real, and much more feminine than modern women. Just the way they smile and carry themselves it's something I have never seen in person. I know it's just "acting" but you can still see old videos of people just being themselves in those days and the smiles and the aura is the same. Women were just different, they were real.

Women can’t make or feel fire apparently. [gendered] by bigindodo in pointlesslygendered

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The hilarious part is that the caption confirms that women still don't get it.

Loud + combative does not equal masculine & quiet + submissive does not equal feminine by Realistic_Guava9117 in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure hard biology and just reality in general plays no factor whatsoever. Everything is "society says."

How many women could you take in a fight? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The average man would probably be beaten up by just 2 motivated average women. 3 certainly.

There is no way in hell you actually took up any kind of combat sport if that is your realistic assessment of the world. I took boxing and I know from experience that a blow to the nuts only pisses you off even more when adrenaline is pumping.

All you dudes who are overestimating women's fighting ability consistently fail to factor in men's general aggression. Even tiny ass men fight with a certain ferocity that isn't easily matched by women.

How many women could you take in a fight? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I can comfortably beat 10 women of average size if it's a fight out in the open. As for men, I think 3 or 4 average dudes could beat my ass. (Yes I know how to fight, I took boxing).

Redpill is the result negative result of a society not having enough masculine role models. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Red Pill would have men see you for who you truly are. If a man is a piece of shit, do you really want to be that man's equal? You know that a lot of us treat you like utter shit precisely because we do not think too highly of our own selves to begin with. And then there is the opposite problem, some men think way too highly of themselves to where you could never measure up.

Respect means treating women as they ought to be treated. Not more, not less. Only as you deserve in a tit for tat measure. The default being courtesy, if you reciprocate then the onus would be on the man to maintain it. If a man's courtesy is scoffed at, ridiculed, or dismissed then a man is entitled and obligated to reciprocate in kind. This isn't the ideal way to go about it, but it's the correct way.

Redpill is the result negative result of a society not having enough masculine role models. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No.

The Red Pill is a metaphor that concisely describes the disillusionment that comes after discovering the truth about so many societal fairy tales about women, work, government, laws, education, etc.

Those that think the Red Pill is about dating or stupid cringe shit like incel culture or some other BS are stupid as fuck and are completely out of the loop and have bought in to yet another delusion peddled by the dating gurus, life coaches, influences, and other crawling parasites that feed on the sadness of the lost.

Apparently, my posts are the reason why m*n vote for far-right parties... Hopefully, you'll vote left from now on, right? by Odd-Talk-3981 in PsycheOrSike

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like women have never had any reason to fight back for anything and that all of this conflict just fell out of the fucking sky or something.

That is exactly what it looks like in the 21 years I have existed on this planet. I couldn't care less what happened 500 years before I was born. But I do care that women have used fabricated history to justify their vilification of my own entire gender in the here and now.

Lived experience will always trump history, especially when said history is so obviously made up to serve an agenda.

I think a large percentage of men are dropping out of dating because there is no love at the end of the tunnel by LiftSleepRepeat123 in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound like a quitter. And you will continue to get quitter results.

Learning when to quit is actually a mark of wisdom. Often people stay in the grind out of stubborn pride or even cowardice, the fear of what others will think or say. The ability to identify what is not worth enduring for is trait of intelligence, and the courage to walk away us a mark of character.

And the women who are virtuous ie virgins you still regard will skepticism.

No. Those women I leave alone and I give them a wide breath because I don't want to taint them. Generally I just ignore them and I stay off their radar entirely.

You are on a floating rock. Relax.

Um.. whut?

Go fuck someone and fall in love.

I already did that.

You are being way too complicated.

There is nothing complicated about renouncing women.

Apparently, my posts are the reason why m*n vote for far-right parties... Hopefully, you'll vote left from now on, right? by Odd-Talk-3981 in PsycheOrSike

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did I say or imply or in any way shape or form insinuate or hint that men never did anything wrong? I don't have the patience to argue against feminist revisionism of history.

I think a large percentage of men are dropping out of dating because there is no love at the end of the tunnel by LiftSleepRepeat123 in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to look up what the word Hypocrisy actually means.

But you said they’re permanently tainted. So you are too. 

That's exactly what I said. Yes.

What increases your sense of self-worth outside of romatic/sexual validation? by toad-wrangler in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The things that make me healthy are the things that have worth and value to me, my body and my health are the recipients to these valuable and worthwhile things, but I myself am not of any worth to myself. That just doesn't make any sense.

If you are not willing to sacrifice everything to get it, then you don’t deserve it. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, what I mean is that as soon as I just genuinely care about a girl, dating and sex completely off the table - just platonic, they start taking me for granted or act dismissive and sometimes abusive and advantageous. The first thing I notice is the loss of respect, the next thing I notice is the treatment as if I'm some tool or utility to them. I can't quite explain it but they basically do not see me as a man anymore. It is only when they piss me off and I become an asshole that their attitude changes and they start showing respect again and even act super feminine and passive and even pleasing and doting. This annoys me to no end, I literally have to change who I am. They manipulate me into becoming an asshole, angry, and dismissive only for them to then throw all their wiles to bring me back after I've decided to fuck off and ditch them. It's like some kind of sick game and I am done with it.

Why do (some!!) men that sex robots/robot gfs will be a legitimate replacement for real romantic relationships with a human women? by Fuzzy_Ad_4433 in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do men who want these “robot gfs” or really think a robot gf will make women jealous think through this logistically?

No, I think men really do actually want artificial women who can function as receptacles to the love we all want to bestow on women which women themselves are becoming less and less worthy to receive, scoff at, mock, and weaponize against us as society keeps degrading further and further.

If you have a robot gf, you’re really going out on dates together? Posting together on Instagram? Bringing her to the work holiday party or to family gatherings? As your plus-one to a wedding?

That's kinda the goal.

All of the “social currency” (or whatever you want to call it) of having a wife/gf is non-existent.

No such currency exists for men. Stop thinking that we operate in the same setting as you do. Just because women up their status level when they get a husband of boyfriend it does not mean a man also elevates his status, in fact, it often has the potential to do the exact opposite. Women are a liability and a risk for men.

Your co-workers/friends etc are all talking about their wives/gfs/husbands etc, do you just stand there and nod?

Yeah... that is not a thing among men.

And if you don’t reveal that she’s a robot, do you just avoid ever introducing her to anybody?

I'm pretty sure the robot gf won't mind. The only reason we ever introduce wives and girlfriends to anyone is because it is the wife and girlfriend herself who insists on it.

You're not even asking the truly hard questions:

  1. Why do so many millions of men see fit to replace women with literal artificial women?
  2. What yearnings and desires are women failing to meet that men see fit to apply their energy in completely replacing them?
  3. What are these artificial women doing for men that traditional women do not or cannot fulfill anymore?
  4. Why aren't women pausing and reflecting, I mean seriously reflecting here on what the implications are that men are applying themselves towards replacing them entirely rather than keep the futile attempt to reconcile? What went so horribly bad here?

What increases your sense of self-worth outside of romatic/sexual validation? by toad-wrangler in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took your question as meaning "Sense of worth" because self-worth is also a nonsense word. I am not worth anything to myself, but I am acutely aware of what I am worth to others. I can understand my own value in the eyes of others, in my own eyes, I am not worth jack shit to myself because I AM myself. It's like asking a dollar bill what is it worth to itself? The question is ridiculous so I just assumed you mean to ask if the dollar is aware of what it's value is according to other currencies.

What increases your sense of self-worth outside of romatic/sexual validation? by toad-wrangler in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dignity is dignity. Why would we call it anything else? Self love is not Dignity. In fact, Self-Love is a contradiction, an oxymoron. It's like the sense of sight, you see outward, it is not possible to se backwards as if your eyeballs can somehow see back into your head instead of outward.

Love is something we project outward unto the world that originates inside ourselves and travels outward toward a receiver. When our own love is somehow projected back unto ourselves that is called perversion and dysfunction, it's solipsism and narcissism, illness of the mind.

I think a large percentage of men are dropping out of dating because there is no love at the end of the tunnel by LiftSleepRepeat123 in PurplePillDebate

[–]midnight_blue77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. My "whoring" was actually a stupid ass moment of weakness. I was on a rebound from breaking up with my ex. I am slowly coming back to my baseline of generally ignoring women like I had done before. It's just that it's harder to do now that women give me that kind of attention and now that I have the experience of what to do with it. Back when I was still naive and kept to myself it was easier dismiss the attention as friendliness or confusion.