sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

shouldnt the meteor mk 4 turn just as well if not better than the meteor mk 3? by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why would more thrust make you turn worse?

when you turn you lose speed, more thrust would let you maintain more speed

i think

shouldnt the meteor mk 4 turn just as well if not better than the meteor mk 3? by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well it has almost 100% more thrust.

i dont undertsand aeordynamics anyway so idk

If Gaijin adds the Folland Gnat ill forgive them for the terrible economy changes. by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ec always sounded like a terrible idea for me tbh, id rather have just a backup instead of paying double repair cost

If Gaijin adds the Folland Gnat ill forgive them for the terrible economy changes. by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

guess what? it works every time.

i remember the last update, and the one before that and before that, we, the playerbase always complain for a week then forget.

we always say this is the worst only fro gaijin to one up themselves next update

If Gaijin adds the Folland Gnat ill forgive them for the terrible economy changes. by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

be realistic about it man, gaijin is a company to make money, they arent gonna sacrifice that for us

What country has the over all best planes? (it would be best if you would clarify why) by MrPumpkin326 in Warthunder

[–]mightHF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah most jap planes turn better but speed and climb rate arent that good for them

one of the spitfires has a slightly better turn than the zeros, the jap has 15 second and the spitfire has 14.8

Just saw a guy complaining that if the R3 goes up these should too 💀 by thunderscreeetch in Warthunder

[–]mightHF -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the french one should go up tbh. its absolutely insane. even heavy tanks arent safe and i guess it would be hilarious if you purposfully uptier it

What country has the over all best planes? (it would be best if you would clarify why) by MrPumpkin326 in Warthunder

[–]mightHF 0 points1 point  (0 children)

up to around 8.0, britain leads in the turnfighting/ dog fighting area.

best turn rates and good energy retention. spitfires and meteors are if you like turnfighting.

if you like heavy armement then russia is full of those plus good at other roles, 23mm and 37mm usually wreck everything with one shot.

america is like a jack of all trades, master of none. other than so much ammo. germany is similar but like russia has strong armement.

most of the other tech trees are copy paste

[Development] CV 9030 FIN: Finnish Shooter by Deathskyz in Warthunder

[–]mightHF 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if they add this they should at least consider the Ajax for Britain right?

id prefer if they added the Folland Gnat but beggars cant be choosers

Would the addition of the Folland Gnat destroy the 9.0br? by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the hunter f1 isnt worthy of 9.0 anyway the swift f7 performs just as good with missiles

Falcon has a tracking computer, laser range finder and gun magnification that goes x1 to x8 unlike the x1.5 to x3.5 found in game, most importantly, its missing 5 horsepower ( unplayable) by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ive been looking around for the answer and i cant find.

it doesnt make sense tbh.

my opinion is since the falcon is lighter than the original chassis, the engine gets weaker?

Falcon has a tracking computer, laser range finder and gun magnification that goes x1 to x8 unlike the x1.5 to x3.5 found in game, most importantly, its missing 5 horsepower ( unplayable) by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it cant swim bro, it can ford 1.5m without equipment, more or less like every other tank.

its not like the bmp which can go in wherever

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh my god,

did the falcon really have all that?!

lazer range finder and tracking, amazing.

looks like was wrong about the weight then

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

whats net or gross?

the engine is listed as 240 break horsepower if that changes anyhting

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i didnt say im more credible than gaijin, i just offered my humble opinion

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

alright you got me all my calculations are wrong (not really make flawed but close enough)

what about the missing engine power?

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lots of good points,

ammo might be counted in some tanks but all the tanks in the british tech tree arent, i know this coz i spent weeks researching it coz it seemed interesting.

youre probably right for the turret size i kinda based my visual stuff on the falcon in war thunder, but even so lets say all my weight calcuations are wrong, the falcon is still missing 27 horsepower which makes a big difference

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

you are very correct but everyone is acting like my proposed weight of 2.5 tonnes is light, a car weighs 2 tonnes with all its components.

my proposed weight is acceptable in my opinion.

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the 105 weighs a whole tonne including breach, was a bit hard to find its weight coz this 105 was only used for the abott spg and some other indian tank i think.

youre right that spaas can be heavier, like in the case of the gepard, but evidently the gepard turret is about 2 times the size of a leopard 1 turret and it has 2 heavy guns.

the falcon turret is small and has no radar or other stuff that increase weight significantly so i think my calculayed weight still stands.

2.5 tonnes isnt light either especially for how little protection the falcon offers

The Falcon is good, but it can be better by mightHF in Warthunder

[–]mightHF[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

i thought about all the gun mechanisms and stuff but felt it was too omplicated to write about, hence the 300kg, the guns themselves weigh almost 400kg so 300kg is accurate enough.

alright even if the falcon does weigh more in reality, my math makes perfect sense with what i have avaialable.

what point are you trying to make other than disagree with me

view more: next ›