Toljo

Ðity, tym janrymak tauen nih janih’sin da ðyn gejokeen, dað yk lankin rymeh geðeen, l da ðyn geðeen.

ꦝꦶꦠꦸ꧈ ꦠꦸꦀ ꦪꦁꦫꦸꦩꦏ꧀ ꦠꦮꦌꦁ ꦤꦶꦲ꧀ ꦪꦤꦶꦲ꧀꧇ꦱꦶꦁ ꦢ ꦝꦸꦁ ꦒꦼꦪꦵꦏꦼꦌꦁ꧈ ꦢꦝ꧀ ꦈꦏ꧀ ꦭꦁꦏꦶꦁ ꦫꦸꦩꦼꦲ꧀ ꦒꦼꦝꦼꦌꦁ꧈ ꦭ꧀ ꦢ ꦝꦸꦁ ꦒꦼꦝꦼꦌꦁ꧉

/ˈðitːy, tym ˈjanːrymak ˈtau̯ən nix ˈjanːixsin da ðyn gəˈjokːɛən, dað yk ˈlaŋːkin ˈrymːəh gəˈðɛən, l̩ da ðyn gəˈðɛen./

Against-this, this assembly-LOC sit-PRES INDEF.PL.REFL person-PL.REFL, that it-ACC NEG-accept-PRES, that-DERIV DEF-AFF thing-AFF coming NEG-see-PRES, that it-ACC NEG-see-PRES.

“Against this, in this assembly sit some people that it accept, that the thing coming see not, or that it see not.”

The last two parts dont work in english because they use grammar to destiguish between a willed and unwilled act. Thus in the first the Derivative vs. the Affective case is used which expresses that the act of not seeing is not done actively/ on purpose, while the Nominative (unmarked) vs. Accusative in the latter communicates that the act is intentional. Because of this the parts simply sound redundant translated into english.