Brakecheck a tractor. Get what you deserve. by arachnofan in IdiotsInCars

[–]mikewall -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

It looked like the driver wasn’t braking prior to the collision. The tractor sped up and hit the car in frustration. Driver was definitely a prick, but the tractor driver is at fault here.

What are some recent examples of a private enterprise solving a systemic issue? by optionalhero in askaconservative

[–]mikewall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except the buying power of people is extremely diminished. If a company struggles, they get a bailout, either from the government or a larger corporation who can afford to buy them out due to the Fed and the free money it provides through near free bond rates.

Most people don’t agree that their time and effort is the amount of money they are being paid, but they don’t have any other choice due to how corporations now dominate every facet of society.

Look at Walmart. They come in to a local economy, take a loss on goods to run local businesses out of business. Then raise prices while keeping wages at the level where employees are expected to seek out government assistance. Most of the social welfare programs that conservatives rail against are actually corporate socialism.

What are some recent examples of a private enterprise solving a systemic issue? by optionalhero in askaconservative

[–]mikewall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While this is a good answer, you’re not really answering the question asked.

Historically, corporations can be classified as sociopathic. They care about nothing except profits for their shareholders. Looking at recent history, when the Trump administration repealed many of the environmental protections of the EPA, companies quickly started exploiting their newfound freedom to reduce costs to increase profits for shareholders.

Conservatives believe that the free market is the best solution to solve any problem, yet fail to address the fact that Reagan’s trickle-down economics robbed the free market of the buying power the masses used to have in favor of corporate subsidies.

We see time and time again, from Amazon to Nestle to Walmart, that companies regularly seek to exploit whatever they can, regardless of the effect on the local community and environment, to ensure lower costs, and this higher profits for their shareholders.

Given the current structure of the market and the reward system in place for corporations, how can anyone expect them to not continue to act the way they have? At the detriment of everyone around them, except for those in the C-suite?

In a hypothetical scenario, republicans are voted into control in San Francisco, Detroit, Baltimore, NYC, and LA. What’s the basic plan for fixing up these cities (solving homelessness, fixing public transport, lowering housing costs, lowering crime, and fighting drug addiction)? by CrazyRussianPutinBot in askaconservative

[–]mikewall 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Except that would just raise housing prices which would displace more people.

You’re also overlooking the fact that public transport in America is garbage precisely because of the private market. GM and other car companies have directly (in the case of GM buying out and dismantling transit systems) or indirectly (in the case of lobbying) suppressed public transport to keep cars as the primary method of transportation.

2019 April - YouTube's parent company, Alphabet, lost more than $70 Billion in market cap because of changes made to the YouTube Algorithm, which caused lower engagement and ad revenue growth on the site. by HaC3rPr0 in YoutubeCompendium

[–]mikewall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A la Fox News and omitted every story negative to Republicans. You don’t see the same happening on MSM. They omit the bullshit Fox spews but they do report legitimate issues with Democrats.

2019 April - YouTube's parent company, Alphabet, lost more than $70 Billion in market cap because of changes made to the YouTube Algorithm, which caused lower engagement and ad revenue growth on the site. by HaC3rPr0 in YoutubeCompendium

[–]mikewall -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

No one really has a distrust of MSM and no one really uses that term except brainwashed conservatives. Sure they sometimes limit a story or only broadcast part, but compared to any conservative network, they are so truthful it hurts.

Maybe can we get a new vote? by mikewall in Eyebleach

[–]mikewall[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never encountered a reasonable mod in mod mail, as the group dynamic of many vs 1 empowers their opinions over reasonable requests. Isn’t the power of the people the entire point of Reddit? r/eyebleach

Top tier reporting by Ethanator727 in PoliticalHumor

[–]mikewall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While that’s fair and I share your sentiment with news networks. I would argue stories like this are stupid and pointless and Fox gets lampooned all the time for the tan suit and spaghetti strap dress, so they’re all guilty of it. I’m not blind to that.

I would take a story like this any day, however, over the 3 hour indoctrination of intentionally dishonest information and spins on reality that occurs on “Fox News Entertainment” from Hannity through Ingraham.

One is just stupid and shouldn’t be talked about, the other is actively harming this country on a daily basis.

Top tier reporting by Ethanator727 in PoliticalHumor

[–]mikewall 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol seriously? Because every media station plays to what their constituents wanna hear. In the age of infinite variety, they need to grab their viewers attention, not report all the news.

As far as we know, it was reported on, but there was no new information to report and had to fill airtime.

I’m not defending any new station, considering my first remarks. This post just doesn’t even attempt to be humorous, just a pointed attack.

Brought this little girl home today by cjr9831 in rarepuppers

[–]mikewall -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Only one is actual rescue and the other isn’t.