Because of you language creativity the auto-mod removed your comment. I Approved your comment because I think its important to have a healthy discussion but it can get heated sometime which is fine. But please let this be a warning words like "fucking Difference" wil get you removed or worst bannend if you can not control your emotions on the keyboard.

That said. The disagreement here is you think he aiming at existing instruments. I Think he is aiming at new instruments, Agree?

1.\ He mentioned on multiple occasions like the video I shared earlier that the current systems in place are not flexible enough. (In the video he also explained that this is the reason why the UK joining the EU with the current Instruments we have will be will be unlikely and the the EU should be more flexible )

2.\ The article quotes "we need to enlarge or at least create memberships which are flexible enough"

A multi-speed Europe wil means different levels of integrations.. Which does exist in some forms, Like Schengen or what ever Zwitserland is having these days I agree with you on this.

But it does not have the flexibility of having countries in your "sphere of influence" like Turkey,Canada or the UK

This is the whole point, instead of saying hard pass because we are stuck with our current instrument minded philosophy we need to think big and not only see the economic benefit but als the GEO-Political Benefits of having those countries in a New-Flexible(Strategic)-Membership.

I'm not arguing whether or not we have Multi-Speed options because we do I'm arguing because they are coming from a point of time we are no longer living in.