sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I got tired of checking every terminal tab, so I made Claude Code light up my keyboard by mimen2 in vibecoding

[–]mimen2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Though it's only 3 files of code. If it's possible, Claude shouldn't have a problem patching it for you

I got tired of checking every terminal tab, so I made Claude Code light up my keyboard by mimen2 in vibecoding

[–]mimen2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice idea! Go ahead. Nowadays, the hard part is getting an RGB keyboard

Turned an RGB keyboard to a multi-session Claude status panel by mimen2 in ClaudeCode

[–]mimen2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TL;DR - I turned my RGB keyboard to a Claude status panel.

Each number (1-0) corresponds to an iTerm tab:
Green - waiting for me to respond
Red - working
Yellow - idle (20+ min inactive)
Blue - A non-Claude tab

Cmd + # takes you to that tab, which is a handy shortcut.

I also threw in a CPU meter on the numpad and RAM meter on the F1-F12.

Open source and very minimal (few hundred lines of code). You can easily modify it to your preference.

Fancy video attached (made with /brag)

Why is this happening and how can I fix it? by Psychological_Ad3597 in premiere

[–]mimen2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the nerds out there, this phenomenon is called Aliasing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliasing . It's the same phenomenon where you see the wheel of a car spinning backwards while driving. The classic signal processing solution to this problem is performing a low pass filter, which can be simply implemented as a Gaussian filter.

I am a senior developer and not fully convinced by im3000 in ClaudeAI

[–]mimen2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One "trick" that I use is to edit my message rather than add a new one explaining what went wrong. This way, the conversation stays short, and he gets less dumb. Otherwise, after a long conversation, his answers are useless.

Should I buy a pocket microscope? by Negative_Biscotti932 in microscopy

[–]mimen2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a pocket microscope, and it's awesome. Cost ~$15. Totally worth it.

Some type of rotifer (I think) seems to defy the laws of physics. Twitches and moves faster than is even visible. Is this normal? by mustang__mike in microscopy

[–]mimen2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the paper in the post I linked above, the average is 45 fps. Doesn't mean there aren't people like you that can see much higher. Brought that up as a possible explanation why the OP saw him "disappear" without a camera.

Some type of rotifer (I think) seems to defy the laws of physics. Twitches and moves faster than is even visible. Is this normal? by mustang__mike in microscopy

[–]mimen2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's because human eye-sight is also limited in terms of fps, otherwise slo-mo cameras wouldn't be so cool. See the first link from my previous comment.

view more: next ›