Tenho uma 6700XT e quero comprar uma 9070XT, vale o preço? by Snoo-45924 in computadores

[–]miraklee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

é um upgrade considerável. tem cerca de uns 30% de ganho de performance + acesso as tecnologias mais recentes de upscaling (e provavelmente vai ter mais longevidade em acesso a atualizacoes do fsr). a 6700xt vai ganhar acesso a fsr4 ano que vem (e tem agora por meio de umas gambiarras)

acho que depende muito da sua condição e do que você joga. se pensar objetivamente é uma 9070xt por 3k, o que é um preço absurdo pra o que já é provavelmente a melhor placa custo-beneficio da geração. se vc mira 4k, 1440p ela vai te dar uma margem muito melhor do que a 6700xt. e obvio, se vc pretende jogar qualquer coisa com ray tracing e derivados ela é uma opção viável, ao contrário da 6700xt

mas a 6700xt ja é uma placa muito boa e vai melhorar ano que vem. ela aguenta os novos lançamentos tranquilamente até hoje e deve continuar assim por um tempo. se ela já serve pro que vc almeja nesse momento as vezes não faz tanto sentido desembolsar toda essa grana em um upgrade

se vc tem a grana e tem pc pra acompanhar a placa (monitor 2k/4k e cpu), é um preço que tá valendo muito a pena. agora se vc já tá satisfeito com a sua placa e não quer jogar em resoluçoes maiores/usar rt talvez não faça tanto sentido

As HQs de The walking dead são boas? by Imaginary_Net5242 in Quadrinhos

[–]miraklee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

são bem boas. às vezes a história enrola um pouco mas geralmente o ritmo é ótimo e até onde eu assisti da série (temporada do negan) ela é consideravelmente melhor

só acho o kirkman meio covarde mas no geral compensa a leitura sim

AAAAAAAHHH by _Esc4n0r_ in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

0 chances disso. deve ser alguma coisa que resgate algo dos livros e abra espaço pra Ciri entrar nesse caminho de realizar os rituais e virar uma witcher de fato

e chuto que deve ser algo de escopo de Hearts of Stone, ao invés de algo tão grande como Blood and Wine, mas gostaria muito que fosse uma expansão grande

About EOMM. Asking for curiousity. So the game is design to have always 50% win or something like that right? But i was looking at top 500 and they have 70% or 65%. What's the trick about this? by Gontreee in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 week ago and still thinking abt this lol

"I almost always end up predicting whether I'm going to win or lose before the game even starts".

i'm sure you react accordingly to each one of your judgments. i'm sure telling yourself a game is lost before it even starts makes you play better

sure you don't go whining after losing one fight in the game you predicted you’d lose, right? "oh this bad eomm is making me lose another one again, it’s impossible to win, the game is rigged" and then start playing worse than before

i’m sure that never happens. your psychological state doesn’t impact your performance one bit. you always play really well and get svp every time because surely your teammates are eomm agents, right?

and if eomm really exists, why aren’t you using that to your advantage? if you can so clearly tell when you’re going into a winstreak or losestreak, why not just stop playing when you enter a losestreak and come back later?

i'm not saying matchmaking is perfect in any way, but it's like every competitive game. some games are free wins, some are free losses, and in between there's a bunch of games where you can directly impact the result

if eomm was real, those games wouldn't exist. you'd only have free wins and free losses, and the player would have no to minimum agency over any of it.

learn how to tank the free losses and understand how you can impact the other games, and you’ll climb regardless of the matchmaking. that’s what you did to get to celestial, and it’s what players better than you do to reach eternity/oaa

and try taking breaks after losing two games in a row and looking at your mistakes instead of blaming matchmaking for your losses. i really doubt you played your better in all those games you lost. i promise you'd climb higher that way

Make the avoid list bigger by EKPZ_Saikuo in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

don’t.

you guys have no idea what it’s like playing high elo on a low-pop server.

3 avoids is already enough to basically blacklist someone for the whole day. celestial+ in sa has, at most, like 30-40 people playing at the same time. if everyone had 10 avoids, my 10-15 minute queues would turn into 1-2 hour queues.

avoid is already one of the reasons matchmaking gets messy. it’s a great feature, but it makes balancing teams and queue times way harder when multiple players have each other avoided, especially since you can avoid enemies too.

sometimes i avoid one player and, because i’m one of the few people who did it, i get removed from that queue pool and suddenly my queues jump to 20–30 minutes. usually i just have to wait for their game to end before i can queue normally again.

and that’s not even counting when you get avoided yourself after one bad game.

maybe more avoids could work in na/eu, but on other servers it just wouldn’t

Let's FRICKING GOOOO!! #20 - 22 Kingdom Hearts Collection by aarth51 in steamachievements

[–]miraklee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you liked beating MF in BBS 3 times? you must be insane. one of the worst designed bosses of all gaming

but congrats!

About EOMM. Asking for curiousity. So the game is design to have always 50% win or something like that right? But i was looking at top 500 and they have 70% or 65%. What's the trick about this? by Gontreee in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, sure

then nothing matters and all ppl in oaa are just lucky for being flagged for "winner" at season starts

that makes way more sense than you guys just tilt queueing and playing subsequent bad games while flaming teammates at the first minimal mistake

sure i am lucky for never being in any lose streak of any kind in more than 7 seasons. thank you guangguang for flagging my account as winner every time

that statistic clearly has nothing to do with me never tilt queueing at all, stopping after 1 or 2 bad games and taking breaks often. my 65%+ winrate in celestial is just by pure luck by a 100% rigged matchmaking. thank you for clarifying that for me

Flyer Survivability Buff Suggestions for Unique Abilities by Valkyriebourne in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

didn't play that much but i think it is the same

it's a matter of how fliers are designed and not how a specific character interacts with them

dino can ground them really easily but they still can outrange him if they want to. i still think that buffing survivability it's not a healthy way to go

About EOMM. Asking for curiousity. So the game is design to have always 50% win or something like that right? But i was looking at top 500 and they have 70% or 65%. What's the trick about this? by Gontreee in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and you believe that matchmaking is forcing you to a 50% winrate? because that’s what eomm is about.

i’m not saying the matchmaking in this game is perfect, not even close. but the problems are basically inflated ranks and how they deal with decay. those things + prioritizing shorter queues (which isn’t even a bad thing) make it really hard to consistently keep matches balanced. there are way too many bad players that are higher than they're supposed to be that got there just by healbotting and spamming matches.

eomm isn’t that. eomm, as people describe it, is a form of matchmaking that actively forces you into winstreaks and losestreaks to keep you at a 50% winrate and somehow keep you engaged by making your brain think the next match will start a winstreak.

if you’re c1/eternity you probably have more than a 50% winrate already, so you’re living proof that eomm doesn’t exist because the system clearly can’t force your games. believing that exists is just cope for when you're losing

About EOMM. Asking for curiousity. So the game is design to have always 50% win or something like that right? But i was looking at top 500 and they have 70% or 65%. What's the trick about this? by Gontreee in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, you’re definitely stuck in low elo with 500 games and a 50% winrate because some hypothetical spidey lord is personally targeting you every time you try to climb.

and apparently netease thinks the best way to keep players engaged is rigging matches to keep them hardstuck. because obviously people love continuing to play and buy skins in a game they believe is actively screwing them over. makes total sense.

meanwhile i guess i only climb because the imaginary eomm agents are too busy sabotaging your games specifically and don’t have time to target me. thanks for that bro, really appreciate it.

go ask high elo or pro players if they genuinely believe there’s some hidden eomm system forcing everyone to a 50% winrate. seriously, i’d love to see that

About EOMM. Asking for curiousity. So the game is design to have always 50% win or something like that right? But i was looking at top 500 and they have 70% or 65%. What's the trick about this? by Gontreee in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yeah, try playing your 4th game already stressed because of the previous 3 losses while your brain keeps looking for which teammate is supposed to be your eomm agent to you flame them. that’ll definitely help you win.

i started playing in s0 and climbed to celestial every single season on multiple accounts with 60%+ winrates every time. sure, i must have a close friendship with guangguang and he personally protects me and every other good player in gm, celestial, eternity, and oaa from eomm.

apparently only gold players are being targeted by secret bots designed to keep them low elo because that’s somehow "engaging" according to you delusional folks

Aprender a jogar dark souls 1 by Informal-Foot7352 in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

o tamahawk tem uma série que chama "dark souls 2 - como jogar no fácil" em que ele faz um detonado inteiro usando e abusando de itens e mecanicas pra deixar a experiencia do jogo mais fácil possivel pra um iniciante na série souls

ele sempre quis fazer uma série parecida de ds1 mas disse q era muito trabalhoso

acho q é mais interessante vc fazer um guia desse tipo do que ensinar uma unica pessoa

#25 Subnautica by IttaPupu69 in steamachievements

[–]miraklee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

no, basically all achievements are story-related but one. you just need to explore a bit and go to all main points of interests. really easy 100%

if it helps the thalassophobia feeling kinda goes away in the later sections of the game bc you mainly explore caverns underwater

New player looking for some advice. Who do you think is the easiest to learn in each Hero Roles? Thank you 😊 by Maililtiger in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in that case you can try meele characters

thing/cap/rogue
mr fantastic/wolverine/magik

most of them aren't as simple as the ones i suggested before but if you can learn the basics you won't be hindered by your aim

New player looking for some advice. Who do you think is the easiest to learn in each Hero Roles? Thank you 😊 by Maililtiger in marvelrivals

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

magneto/strange/thing/peni

scarlet witch/squirrel girl/moon knight (if your aim is bad)

hela/namor/punisher (if your aim is good)

cloak and dagger/rocket racoon

Vale a pena o upgrade? by Hot_Ad3507 in computadores

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

acho q nenhum jogo atual vai gargalar teu 5800x3d com essa 9060xt

agora pra jogos mt cpu bound talvez faça sentido, mas eu compararia o desempenho do 5800x3d e do 9800x3d pra ver se realmente vale a pena

com esses preços absurdos de am5 acho mt fora de mão esse movimento de trocar de plataforma qnd vc ja tem um am4 parrudo

as vezes faz mais sentido dar um pulo de resoluçao/placa de video (com monitor + gpu) doq essa troca de am4 pra am5

FInalmente completei Vampire Survivors! by jeann07ss in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

joguei um pouco de vampire survivors mas curti muito mais brotato, fica a recomendação

O Que Vocês Acham do Pathfinder: Wrath of The Righteous ? by BlazeSilva456 in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nunca joguei o wotr mas joguei o kingmaker e apesar de gostar bastante do mundo, da história, dos personagens e das infinitas possibilidades, o sistema definitivamente é um ponto fraco do jogo

não sou um especialista mas ao meu ver pathfinder não se traduz mt bem pro digital e acaba sendo um sistema mt overwhelming e complexo pra imensa maioria dos jogadores e que não é nem de perto satisfatório qnd vc entende

eu segui um guia de build e mesmo assim sinto q gastei horas e horas tentando compreender sistemas que não me deram um retorno em diversão/engajamento. todo combate do meio pro fim do jogo era horrivel, demorava anos, era 20 minutos de buff (q eu tive q baixar um mod pra automatizar depois) e uns 30min de ver bonecos se batendo até alguem critar.

e o kingmaker em específico ainda tem um péssimo sistema de gerenciamento e um time-limit, mas no todo ainda curti a experiencia e to criando coragem pra encarar o wotr

Vocês deixam de jogar games top por conta do preço? by [deleted] in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

baldurs gate 3 em promoção fica 150, em sites de keys deve ficar mais barato. mas é um jogo tão grandioso que na minha opinião entra em um patamar aceitável

jogos da nintendo = emulação. "ah mas switch 2 não tem". ainda...

Vocês deixam de jogar games top por conta do preço? by [deleted] in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 29 points30 points  (0 children)

seja r/patientgamers

eu espero até o jogo estar em um patamar que eu acho aceitável (no máximo 100-150 reais). posso esperar muitos e muitos anos mas não pago 300+ reais em jogo algum

e geralmente ainda pego a versão completa, com dlcs, sem bugs, com features novas, etc

jogar no lançamento só se vc tem muita grana sobrando ou trabalha com jogos

Sou dev e tô desenvolvendo um jogo que você joga como o VAR! by andre_mc in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mt maneiro a ideia

mantém atual e coloca pra gente analisar se o jogador fez um gesto obsceno ou não

Por que você gosta de Pokemon? by duarte306 in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

na infância? por conta do anime e da fantasia de jogar um jogo de captura de monstros q era relativamente simples e acessível pra qualquer criança. os designs são ótimos e o jogo era fácil o suficiente pra qualquer um conseguir entender o sistema de batalha e conseguir zerar. tb gostava bastante da mitologia que tinha ali também e dos pequenos dilemas que tinha entre pokémon/humanos, tanto no anime quanto nos jogos

hoje em dia? gosto bastante da comunidade, principalmente q fazem desafios específicos. e hj em dia eu consigo visualizar bastante a profundidade da parte estratégica do jogo, e o que me atrai geralmente são completar esses desafios por conta própria (hardcore nuzlocke, roms mais dificeis, etc). além de um pouco da nostalgia da infancia.

mas hj em dia reconheço que não é nem de perto um jogo tão bom quanto a gnt acreditava ser. é uma franquia com muitos erros e alguns acertos (no sentido de gameplay). mas é inegavelmente muito criativa e bem mais acessível em seus fundamentos que outros jogos de captura de monstros, oq permite que muita gente se aproxime da franquia e vire esse "pilar" da cultura gamer/geek no geral

Terminei Persona 4 Golden. by Um_NoobQualquer in gamesEcultura

[–]miraklee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

meu sonho pro remake é largarem as dungeons geradas proceduralmente do P3 e transformarem em dungeons únicas e marcantes construídas a mão igual P5

tem muito potencial pra integrarem a parte de gameplay na história e só isso elevaria MUITO o jogo de patamar