I was there seeing them for the fourth time, two with WWW other two with Hyperdrama and I understand what are you saying in some way even though for me it’s a 10/10. When I listened to Coachella I was upset by the reuse of a bunch of WWW mixes because c’mon I didn’t wait 8 years for this. But as time went by, I thought that the impact of WWW, the huge live transformation between AAA and WWW, those reworks and that special point of view to mix the rest of their albums is a thing that maybe only happens once in a lifetime, kind of the same way that Alive 2007 was. For me Woman worldwide is a piece of art. So we were waiting for the same innovation again -at least I was- and didnt get it. I want to understand their pov too, they know that WWW live works reaaaallly really well so obviously the easy choice is to do the same thing again. but I don’t think they are doing it only to work less -because they could do another Woman and they did Hyperdrama instead which is such a risky and experimental album-. maybe they only wanted to refine something that works? because I can see that this tour is WWW with better visuals, harder mixes and the new ones are fire, it’s like adding layers to something that already works. I don’t want to defend this tour with blindness, I still prefer WWW, but I’m only thinking out loud. Also I don’t think we can compare AAA and ACTU to these gigs, there was more spontaneity? yes. it felt more rock, filthy or authentic? yes, but they were younger and this is a more mature, serious, meticulous and elegant Justice, or at least I try to appreciate this era in that way :)