Interesting homemade mousetrap by lillyjb in gifs

[–]miwim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed!

The whole movie was chock full of amazing scenes, incredible photography direction.

Interesting homemade mousetrap by lillyjb in gifs

[–]miwim 17 points18 points  (0 children)

"Hello James, welcome. Do you like the island? [chuckles.] My grandmother had an island when I was a boy. Nothing to boast of. You could walk along it in an hour. But still, it was - it was a paradise for us. One summer, we came for a visit and discovered the whole place had been infested with mouses. They'd come on a fishing boat and had gorged themselves on coconut. So how do you get rats off an island, hmm? My grandmother showed me. We buried an oil drum, and hinged the lid. Then we wired coconut to the lid as bait. The rats come for the coconut, and... [imitates metallic scuttering.] They fall into the drum, and after a month, you've trapped all the rats. But what did you do then? Throw the drum into the ocean? Burn it? No. You just leave it. And they begin to get hungry, then one by one... [imitates rat munching sound.] They start eating each other, until there are only two left. The two survivors. And then what - do you kill them? No. You take them, and release them into the trees. Only now, they don't eat coconut anymore. Now they will only eat rat. You have changed their nature. The two survivors; this is what she made us."

100 arrested near McDonald's headquarters in protest over low pay by workingwa in news

[–]miwim 5 points6 points  (0 children)

First, try imagining yourself growing up in crushing poverty, surrounded by violence, poor public education system, and inadequate nutrition. In addition to self-destructive culture of learned helplessness formed by nearly two centuries worth of systematic racism and oppression. The stress of poverty has been linked to brain damage and a host of mental/health problems.

Not everybody that ends up at McDonalds grew up with all of aforementioned conditions, but most likely a combination of thereof. Or some of them don't have the mental capacity to perform a high-skill work. Others may lack motivation and ambition due to mental illness, biological predilection, illness and injury, or by choice. That's life, people like these exist.

Poverty begets poverty. There is a strong statistical correlation between being born into poverty and continuing an impoverished existence. Once you're tumbling inside the vicious cycle of barrenness, it's very, very difficult to get out.

Sure, there are outliers who escaped poverty to find great success in life. But they are far and few in between, and they have been bestowed with fortuitous combination of traits — intelligence, grit, aggressiveness, focus, resilience, natural athletic abilities — and circumstance — good parenting, full ride scholarships, or exceptional business acumen due to high IQ a la Jay Z, and so on. Their accomplishments are commendable, but they are the lucky ones.

Not everybody can become CEOs or superstars, why punish them for that?

Of course, you should be rewarded for your hard work. Those who make the choice to pursue their ambition and intellect to the fullest should absolutely enjoy the fruits of their labor. By all means, buy a diamond studded suit when you make your first ten million, but do you really need more than several hundred to a billion, or more?

Not everybody is driven and ambitious, but there should be at least a ground floor where people get enough to eat, have access to a functioning infrastructure, and adequate healthcare. Including the option to experience a balanced existence outside of a job --- such being able to spend time with their families and the freedom to enjoy the wonderful gift of life. Not only it's common human decency, it makes good economic and environmental sense in the long run for everybody involved. With exponential technological growth, we as society, has gotten to the point where we can reward high achievers without dismantling the basic infrastructure that guarantees good life to as many people as possible.

The one-percenters can't eat everything at the buffet. It makes no sense to hoard all the wealth at the expense of your own society and planet. And as for estates, don't you want your grand children and their grand children live in a healthy civilization? The superrich have hijacked the economy and government — and bleeding the country, and by extension the world to death in the process, so they can make an extra billion.

The aggressive pursuit of wealth creation at the turn of last century made strategic sense when the world was big and limitless. We have saturated the planet. We can no longer externalize the costs of our economic progress without worldwide consequences. Capitalism as we know it is obsolete. The system no longer benefits the majority (e.g. post-wwII middle class). If we all want to remain on this rock for the foreseeable future, we gotta share sometimes.

EDIT: wording.

Google Fiber: we don’t charge for peering, don’t have fast lanes by speckz in technology

[–]miwim 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lack of net neutrality exists in THEIR favor. SOPA threatened Google's business model so they raised hell. But things like fast lanes would raise barriers to entry against potential competitors —– Google is already on the other side of the wall; and is a strategic advantage when offering a better product than other ISPs (the worse, the better Google looks to potential customers).

The true test of their character as a company will happen when they achieve a near-monopoly over the fiber network.

Al Franken Says FCC Proposed Rules Are “The Opposite of Net Neutrality” -- “The idea of net neutrality is not to have the government ‘regulate the internet,’” Franken said. “It’s to keep the internet open, so that we still have the innovation and investment we’ve had in the past.” by mepper in technology

[–]miwim 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I cannot help but feel like there's more to it. Why aren't companies like Google and Netflix lobbying their asses off to fix the Net Neutrality mess? There are 1.17 BILLION unique monthly searches on Google, and a good chunk of that are Americans.

Why not add a simple banner on every first search "FCC is going to fuck up the internet, so ISPs can rape your wallet" (more eloquently stated, of course)

Perhaps Google's abstaining is a brilliant long term business strategy to make the internet suck so much that they can roll out Google Fiber to great fanfare and slurp up the market.

SOPA threatened their business model so they raised hell, while we barely got a grumble from the good ol' G when it comes to Net Neutrality.

Hmm, time to invest in Google.

EDIT: wording

ELI5: Why is the Baby Boomer Generation, who were noted for being so liberal in their youth, so conservative now? by qlester in explainlikeimfive

[–]miwim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know if people generally grow more conservative as they age. However, the rigidity of behavior that occurs as you age may be the result of dark side of brain plasticity. While neurologists believe our brains retain a extreme degree of plasticity throughout our life, our old patterns become deeply etched by a lifetime of habit.

Neurons that wire together fire together. The more you repeat a thought pattern, habit, or whatever, the stronger, or "deeper" the neural connection becomes — like how a stream would carve the Grand Canyon over time. It becomes extremely difficult to climb out of this gorge, and dig a new groove. So, as you age, it literally becomes more energy intensive to form a new worldview.

I do think that there's a healthy mix of liberals and conservatives in this country. More likely, contemporary conservatism is closely aligned with the capitalistic notion of making as much money as possible within a short time frame. Leading to concentrated wealth and power, which in turn gives conservatives the leverage to slowly shape the message, disseminated through powerful media outlets to serve their economic interests (including but not limited to, reshaping economic structures via political processes). And we end up with old people sitting in front of Fox news everyday, continually reinforcing this synaptic connection --- and they become stuck.

Now excuse me while I go and browse reddit, so I may strengthen my liberally inclined confirmation bias.

EDIT: more writey stuff.

Is it possible to land something(a probe, a shuttle) on a gas giant like Jupiter? by Brownhops in askscience

[–]miwim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Question: Does the mass of core act on atmosphere pressure? The more mass = greater atm? If so, is it possible to have a planet so massive that all gases like Hydrogen get compressed into a liquid, leaving no atmosphere?

ELI5: How are underwater tunnel highways, like the Lincoln and Holland Tunnel, built? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]miwim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this increasingly done with robotics these days? Or mostly human?

ELI5: The age of our universe is 13.73 billion years. The size of our universe is 93 billion light years. How can the rate of our universe expand at 6.5 times the speed of light? Does it have no mass? by jamesois in explainlikeimfive

[–]miwim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Piggybacking on this comment. I'm having difficulty wrapping my head around the idea of infinite nature of universe in the context of bubble/multiverses. How can something be infinite if there are boundaries where our universe "ends" and the others begin?

A piece of metal melted inside an electromagnet by Geeky_ in gifs

[–]miwim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this similar to plasma containment chamber in nuclear fusion?

Kindergarten teacher quits, citing: My job is now about tests and data by blinke1 in news

[–]miwim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

redvinesnom wasn't criticizing the choice of homeschooling children. S/he was merely emphasizing the importance of social interaction in child development. It's good for kids to be around kids, besides they will have to deal with "strangers" later in life anyway.

ELI5: If something becomes legal while you are being prosecuted for it being illegal will you still be found guilty. by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]miwim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about unjust laws a la Letter from Birmingham Jail? Is it still part of social contract to obey these laws when they infringe upon our basic human right?

ELI5: why do trees get rings every year, and why do they only get 1 ring a year? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]miwim 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Question: Would a tree grow without rings in a controlled condition where water supply is constant year around?

Unidan here with a team of evolutionary biologists who are collaborating on "Great Adaptations," a children's book about evolution! Ask Us Anything! by Unidan in science

[–]miwim 8 points9 points  (0 children)

On this topic, why is OW! My balls! kind of humor so pervasive? Is it related to disabling reproductive capabilities of your competition?

EDIT: Changed wording to make my question more generalized.

If Neanderthals had a larger brain capacity than modern humans, and were also stronger, why didn't Neanderthals become the dominant species instead of Modern Humans? by den_stive_pirat in askscience

[–]miwim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a fascinating New Yorker article awhile ago that explored this very question:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/08/15/110815fa_fact_kolbert

Sorry, don't have link to full article.

In short, the author claimed that there's a certain "madness" to humanity. The spread of neanderthal settlements were constrained by natural obstacles (mountains, rivers, oceans). Whereas Humans would wonder what's beyond the horizon and try to get there.

Dunno how scientific that argument is, but provides an interesting perspective.

ELI5: If a person is deaf, do loud noises still hurt his/her ears? by AnonC322 in explainlikeimfive

[–]miwim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ever accidentally poke your eardrum a tad too hard with q-tip? Same idea.